Head Honcho Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 What do you think? Should he even be picked for the squad?
Suffolk_fox Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 Having Beckham play for England again would be like us resorting to playing MDV up front as a lone striker. He was good, but a bit one dimensional. He would often score from a free kick, but I would rather have Gerrard or Lennon creating lots of chances instead of a Becks Free Kick.
Wils Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 I think he probably will play again at some point,if we get injuries and that or if he plays well for Madrid. I would prob have him in the squad, hes really fallen down the pecking order though.
filbertway Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 I hope not, it's time to move forwards now
Deathside Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 ummm... england / real madrid / mr posh spice I think you can guess what I voted
lookwhaticando Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 I hope he doesn't, but I've a feeling he will pop up again at some point.
Daggers Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 How come FIVE people are 'Not Bothered' but were bothered enough to vote?
davieG Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 How come FIVE people are 'Not Bothered' but were bothered enough to vote? Because we're polite and like to contribute to the topic, albeit without too much effort. Which has now increased 10 fold.
Thracian Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 I can't imagine it apart from a special situation of some sort. Or someone invents a time machine!.
C-man Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 I think he should be in the squad but he shouldn't start.
Daggers Posted 3 September 2006 Posted 3 September 2006 He will be too old for the WC, and much slower! Time to bed in new blood and make a fresh start - having an out of form Lamperd and Phil Neville in the squad is bad enough. England won't miss him.
Stevosevic Posted 4 September 2006 Posted 4 September 2006 He will be too old for the WC, and much slower! Time to bed in new blood and make a fresh start - having an out of form Lamperd and Phil Neville in the squad is bad enough. England won't miss him. You can hardly say Phil Neville is off form, he has started the season performing extremely well.
Daggers Posted 4 September 2006 Posted 4 September 2006 You can hardly say Phil Neville is off form, he has started the season performing extremely well. Are you saying Phil Neville is the best right back we have in England when his brother is injured?
Manwell Pablo Posted 4 September 2006 Posted 4 September 2006 Are you saying Phil Neville is the best right back we have in England when his brother is injured? Who do you think should play then Bob of the disco varity?
Stevosevic Posted 4 September 2006 Posted 4 September 2006 Are you saying Phil Neville is the best right back we have in England when his brother is injured? yes, who else is there? he has a vast amount of experience and you dont play for Man united for 8/9 years by being a bad player.
Daggers Posted 4 September 2006 Posted 4 September 2006 In the current squad either Young or Brown would get my vote above him. The reason why Phil Neville got selected for Man United or England will forever remain a mystery to me. Don't like him, don't rate him, don't want him playing for the national team. I don't think he's reliable or talented...simply adequate, and on a number of occaisions for England he's been found badly wanting. Sorry.
Stevosevic Posted 4 September 2006 Posted 4 September 2006 In the current squad either Young or Brown would get my vote above him. The reason why Phil Neville got selected for Man United or England will forever remain a mystery to me. Don't like him, don't rate him, don't want him playing for the national team. I don't think he's reliable or talented...simply adequate, and on a number of occaisions for England he's been found badly wanting. Sorry. Wes Brown is a far better centre-back than a RB and you cant be serious about Young? there is a reason why he is stuck at Charlton and that is because he isnt that good, the only team interested in taking him was West Ham and that isnt much of a step up, if any.
stulcfc Posted 4 September 2006 Posted 4 September 2006 no i dont think he will and hopefuly im right dont get me wrong i used to like the guy but thought he sould have hung up his boot with england after his form in euro 2004
lcfc_jme Posted 4 September 2006 Posted 4 September 2006 I don't think he'll play for England again. He's had his glory days and his days at the top. His days were numbered when Sven agreed to give his job up. He adds valuable presence and experience to the side, but having somebody in the team specifically for set-pieces is something we cannot afford to do if we are to challenge for major trophies.
lildave3 Posted 5 September 2006 Posted 5 September 2006 Hope not, lennon and SWP abr better than him and theres always gerrard on the right aswell. He couldnt beat his man then put a cross in to set up a goal like gerrard/lennon did on saturday.
Ultra Posted 5 September 2006 Posted 5 September 2006 In the current squad either Young or Brown would get my vote above him. The reason why Phil Neville got selected for Man United or England will forever remain a mystery to me. Don't like him, don't rate him, don't want him playing for the national team. I don't think he's reliable or talented...simply adequate, and on a number of occaisions for England he's been found badly wanting. Sorry. But Young's injured at the moment, that's why he isn't in the squad!
Ultra Posted 5 September 2006 Posted 5 September 2006 I don't think he'll play for England again. He's had his glory days and his days at the top. His days were numbered when Sven agreed to give his job up. Exactly. He was one of Sven's "Chosen Men" (as Thracian would put it) But thankfully McClaren's had the guts to move on. The days of the galacticos have long since gone, for England as well as Real Madrid!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.