Wils Posted 13 January 2007 Posted 13 January 2007 Hendo 7 Maybury 7 Paddy M 6 Paddy K 7 McAuley 8 Hughes 7 Tiatto 7 Williams 6 Levi 7 Fryatt 8 Hume 8
hebangsthedrums Posted 13 January 2007 Posted 13 January 2007 Hendo 7 - Couple of decent punches just one bad kick Maybury 7 - First thing i said to my dad was ffs Maybury at left back, but he looked comfortable today apart from one time the Colc player knew he didnt want to use his left foot and snatched it off him Paddy M 6 - Looked the weak link in defence and another stupid booking, however made aocuple of good blocks Paddy K 8 - Reassured as ever dont think he put a foot wrong McAuley 8 - Good run and a shot from a defender on target! Loks an excellent passer and should be 2nd choice CB Hughes 8 - Most effort ifve seen him put in, looked fearless (cept for wimping out of one tackle) which 6 months ago would have seemed alien when talking about hughes Tiatto 7 - Nice controlled aggression for once (in the main) some nice interchanges Williams 7 - Actually hassled and harried, shows glimpses of class and seems to give create time for himself on the ball. Like hughes couple of excellent passes Levi 7 Fryatt 8 - much better, looked like he was fighting for his place - chasing down and being awkward. some excellent hold up play Hume 8 - as ever 100% committed some nice touches and a good finish. probably MOTM
goal-mangal Posted 13 January 2007 Posted 13 January 2007 I haven't seen so much Lcfc games this season but one thing that I really don't know very well is that when Patrick McCarthy has turned into a shit player ?
Geo V Posted 13 January 2007 Posted 13 January 2007 I didnt go so cant rate them, even though the radio commentators gave us plenty ! Is todays team our best 11 then? It must be close? I think if R Kelly tries to keep a settle side now we could kick on.
hebangsthedrums Posted 13 January 2007 Posted 13 January 2007 I haven't seen so much Lcfc games this season but one thing that I really don't know very well is that when Patrick McCarthy has turned into a shit player ? I think the problem was that we needed a player who showed a bit of passion so badly, that when paddy came along he was very well received and some people (myself included) overlooked his shortcomings - lack of pace, rash, not that strong in the air for a CB etc
potter3 Posted 13 January 2007 Posted 13 January 2007 Hendo 7 McAuley 8 Paddy M 6 Paddy K 7 Maybury 7 Hughes 6 Tiatto 6 Williams 6 Levi 7 Fryatt 8 Hume 7 Odd, there wasn't any really good individual performances, but I though we played well as a team, for the most part anyway.
Tommeh Posted 13 January 2007 Posted 13 January 2007 Hendo 7 Maybury 6 McCarthy 7 Kisnorbo 7 McAuley 7 - What we've come to expect of him now Levi 7 - Took his time getting into the game but was big threat 2nd half Williams 8 - Great range of passing got stuck in aswell Tiatto 6 - Early booking limited him to getting too stuck in Hughes 6 Fryatt 8 motm Huuuume 7 The strikers were looking like their old selves of last season in 1st half but inevatibaly began to tire 2nd, but against a tall colchester back lines they caused numerous problems
syston_fox Posted 13 January 2007 Posted 13 January 2007 I thought Fryatt showed glimpses of what he was all about last season but feel he should have put away at least one of the decent chances that he had today. He needs that elusive goal to boost his confidence!
Fez of Mahrez Posted 13 January 2007 Posted 13 January 2007 Henderson 7 McAuley 7 Maybury 6 Kisnorbo 7 McCarthy 6 Porter 6 Tiatto 7 Williams 6 Hughes 6 Fryatt 7 Hume 7
Kilworthfox Posted 14 January 2007 Posted 14 January 2007 Henderson 7 McAuley 8 Maybury 7 Kisnorbo 8 McCarthy 7 Porter 6 Tiatto 7 Williams 7 Hughes 7 Fryatt 9 Hume 8
Jimmy Posted 14 January 2007 Posted 14 January 2007 Hendo 6 McAuley 7 Kissa 6 Paddy 6 Maybury 6 Hughes 6 Tiatto 7 Williams 7 Porter 6 Hume 8 Fryatt 7 Cada N/A not enough time
Monk Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 Some of the highest player ratings for a league match I have seen this season - I hope we can keep it up!
The People's Hero Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 Erm... I didn't see it in quite the same way. Williams and Hughes missing for most of the match... Levi outclassed and outplayed (admittedly by a good player) and Fryatt doing little of note. I'd go 4/5 for Williams/Hughes/Fryatt/McCarthy. 6s for most others. 7 for Kisnorbo/McAuley/Maybury.
Ric Flair Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 Erm... I didn't see it in quite the same way. Williams and Hughes missing for most of the match... Levi outclassed and outplayed (admittedly by a good player) and Fryatt doing little of note. I'd go 4/5 for Williams/Hughes/Fryatt/McCarthy. 6s for most others. 7 for Kisnorbo/McAuley/Maybury. That's the second time that Porter has been marked out of the entire game by Halford. Great player he is, I wish Stearman could re-find his form from last season as Halford and Stearman are very similar players. Just one is fulfilling his potential and the other isn't at the minute.
Jimmy Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 That's the second time that Porter has been marked out of the entire game by Halford. Great player he is, I wish Stearman could re-find his form from last season as Halford and Stearman are very similar players. Just one is fulfilling his potential and the other isn't at the minute. halford could easily have as difficult a second full season in this league as stearman is having
Thracian Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 That's the second time that Porter has been marked out of the entire game by Halford. Great player he is, I wish Stearman could re-find his form from last season as Halford and Stearman are very similar players. Just one is fulfilling his potential and the other isn't at the minute. Ummmm. Not saying he's wrong but TPH can be quite reactionary and listening on the radio (not necessarily a good guide I admit) Levi seemed to be quite well involved and to present a few chances to people. General consensus seems to suggest he was worth about 6.5 and to be one of the few to pose a threat second half. Not quite the same as being outclassed and outplayed although probably below his recent standards. Remember TPH also described Fryatt as doing "little of note" and, again, while there is sure to be some basis for that opinion, it is hard to equate it with the vast majority who seemed to have Fryatt as MoM or close to it. From a distance I would find it hard to rate a main striker at the level of 8 points or thereabouts on a day when he didn't score. But he did make our only goal, which did mean we got a point. A pity he didn't convert any of the two or three chances Levi presented him with, according to commentary. Then they'd both have more to be pleased about. As would TPH.
Sods Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 Henderson 7- Did what was needed McAuley 7- Im suprised how well he is doing at right back McCarthy 7- Personally i didn't think he had a bad game (seen him play much worse) Kisnorbo 8- Big rock at the back again Maybury 7- What a man he is Hughes 6- Played well in 1st not as good in 2nd Tiatto 8- Im becoming to like this man a lot now in cm, worked his socks off Williams 7- Thought he worked well with humey and fryatt Porter 7- An average game but still a threat Hume 8- Played well, bout time to Humey Fryatt 9- Worked his socks off and was back to his old self .
The People's Hero Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 Ummmm. Not saying he's wrong but TPH can be quite reactionary and listening on the radio (not necessarily a good guide I admit) Levi seemed to be quite well involved and to present a few chances to people. General consensus seems to suggest he was worth about 6.5 and to be one of the few to pose a threat second half. Not quite the same as being outclassed and outplayed although probably below his recent standards. Remember TPH also described Fryatt as doing "little of note" and, again, while there is sure to be some basis for that opinion, it is hard to equate it with the vast majority who seemed to have Fryatt as MoM or close to it. From a distance I would find it hard to rate a main striker at the level of 8 points or thereabouts on a day when he didn't score. But he did make our only goal, which did mean we got a point. A pity he didn't convert any of the two or three chances Levi presented him with, according to commentary. Then they'd both have more to be pleased about. As would TPH. Appreciate what you're saying here... and I feel you may have taken my comments as a slight against LP... they weren't. Halford had a good game and LP just doesn't have enough about him to worry a pacy defender with the quality Halford has. Porter wasn't TOTALLY ineffective... and I'd rate him as about 6/10 but he just didn't seem to have any other ideas after he realised that Halford could match him for pace and is technically a superior player. As for Fryatt, if that performance is worth an 8... well, shows how far some of your expectations have sunk.
James. Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 Appreciate what you're saying here... and I feel you may have taken my comments as a slight against LP... they weren't. Halford had a good game and LP just doesn't have enough about him to worry a pacy defender with the quality Halford has. Porter wasn't TOTALLY ineffective... and I'd rate him as about 6/10 but he just didn't seem to have any other ideas after he realised that Halford could match him for pace and is technically a superior player. As for Fryatt, if that performance is worth an 8... well, shows how far some of your expectations have sunk. fryatt caused occasional problems with decent movement and positioning but overall he lacked sharpness and confidence. 6.
The People's Hero Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 fryatt caused occasional problems with decent movement and positioning but overall he lacked sharpness and confidence. 6. Fair assessment I'd say. Although for a performance so lacking in any cutting edge/end product, I'd err towards a 5. A lot of this comes down to the fact though that half the people on here award a 6/7 for an average performace... Not that it matters of course.
lookwhaticando Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 Fair assessment I'd say. Although for a performance so lacking in any cutting edge/end product, I'd err towards a 5. A lot of this comes down to the fact though that half the people on here award a 6/7 for an average performace... Not that it matters of course. Maybe Fryatt's rating is relative to his previous efforts?
Thracian Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 Maybe Fryatt's rating is relative to his previous efforts? You might have something there. That and the fact that so many fans really want him to do well and be back to his best. It wouldn't be hard for a little objectivity to be lost.
MBK Posted 15 January 2007 Posted 15 January 2007 You might have something there. That and the fact that so many fans really want him to do well and be back to his best. It wouldn't be hard for a little objectivity to be lost. In the end, even Hume seems to have missed some relatively easy shots...and TPH is right, fans expectations have sunk.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.