Joe. Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 To settle this argument would you play Elvis Hammond in the starting 11 at this current time? Personally I would. If not, who would you play instead and why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeyB Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 Bring him off the bench. He's more effective there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filbertway Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 Off the bench, unless its a choice between him and horsfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
De Vries The King Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 not a chance, such limited ability and we have better options available, Hume, Horsefield, Fryatt. At most I would bring him on in the last 10 minutes of a game as he has pace that could beat a tiring back four. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez of Mahrez Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I'm fed up of talking about this idiot. Here's a picture of Girls Aloud; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonisco Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I'm fed up of talking about this idiot. Here's a picture of Girls Aloud; :laugh: In fact, that reminds me, the Chebs thread has sunk to the second page of General Chat... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 Without a doubt. Horsfield has no case, Fryatt is not fully fit, Dodds is not with us and therefore we have no fit and avaiable alternative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potter3 Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I'm the second to vote yes It's only the in the current situation though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lildave3 Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 Wouldn't even put him in the squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I'd sooner have him than Horsefield, in fact I'd sooner have MDV back than Horsefield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 i'd rather play stephen hawkins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe. Posted 20 March 2007 Author Share Posted 20 March 2007 That's why I said yes. Purely because there is nobody else. Fryatt not fit. Horsfield a waste of space at the minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeyB Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 He's more as an impact player. he'll never get you 20 goals a season unless he was playing in the rymands league and that still might not be possible. but what he does give you is that option of fresh, quick legs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wezleylowski Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 oh hes a poor player some would say worse than akinbyi, in fact most would worst touch and shooting in the league Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potter3 Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I'd play him for the comedy value alone eg. THAT miss from 3 yards on Saturday, most poeple fell about laughing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonisco Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I voted 'no' because I'm hoping that Fryatt will be fit for Stoke, however if he's not then I'd definitely have him in over Horsfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wils Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I cant belive people are talking about putting this clown in the squad let alone the starting line up?Come on how many times do people have to watch him to realise he is terrible and cannot offer anything to our club.Hes not going to get us promoted,hes never going to score goals at this level like we need him to.He has "pace" as people always say but that means nothing when he cannot dribble or finish.Dear me. Rant Over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shroomjuice Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I cant belive people are talking about putting this clown in the squad let alone the starting line up?Come on how many times do people have to watch him to realise he is terrible and cannot offer anything to our club.Hes not going to get us promoted,hes never going to score goals at this level like we need him to.He has "pace" as people always say but that means nothing when he cannot dribble or finish.Dear me. Rant Over. come on guys get with it, if your considering that he should even live in leicester let alone play for our team you obviously have not been watching him play. If I was as bad as him I would not even dream of showing up on saturday, he is a waste of space a poor excuse for proffesional footballer and I would not even trust him to sell the programmes as he would prob fook that up as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James. Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I voted 'no' because I'm hoping that Fryatt will be fit for Stoke, however if he's not then I'd definitely have him in over Horsfield. What a f**king awful choice though! Fryatt - no form, unfit, injured and a bit fat. Horsfield - old, slow, rubbish and a bit fat. Hammond - just plain bad but quite astoundingly the preferred choice! This better be a good summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wils Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 Do you think when Elvis was taught how to play football they forgot to tell him the offside rule. Very possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe. Posted 20 March 2007 Author Share Posted 20 March 2007 The thing is, if he actually could just stay onside a few times he could score so many more goals. If he is so pacey why does he need to do it every time the ball is played to him? So very frustrating... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I voted NO. One simple reason...He's CRAP!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez of Mahrez Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 Do you think when Elvis was taught how to play football they forgot to tell him the offside rule. Very possible. I think it's more possible that when Elvis was taught how to play football they forgot to teach him to play football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wils Posted 20 March 2007 Share Posted 20 March 2007 I think it's more possible that when Elvis was taught how to play football they forgot to teach him to play football. That is possible.Teams dont even need to play the offside trap,he falls into the bugger anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe. Posted 20 March 2007 Author Share Posted 20 March 2007 I think it's more possible that when Elvis was taught how to play football they forgot to teach him to play football. Genius :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.