Monk Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 O Niell wanted to sign T Sinclair 8 frickin years ago!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royston. Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 TSinc would be useless. You want wingers with pace and energy otherwise dont bother playing wingers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe. Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 TSinc would be useless. You want wingers with pace and energy otherwise dont bother playing wingers. Beckham's always done alright for himself... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royston. Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 Beckham's always done alright for himself... Becks had energy and the best cross/freekick and his passing was good too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Fox Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 TSinc would be useless. You want wingers with pace and energy otherwise dont bother playing wingers. Oh dear lord. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royston. Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 Oh dear lord. What did I do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Fox Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 Becks had energy and the best cross/freekick and his passing was good too. Hold up, there's another one. Genius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Fox Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 What did I do? Unleashed your football expertise onto the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 Rumoured. And from someone who works at the ground etc. But he was right about a fair few, like Horsfield for example. Whaddyafink? I fink it's a pity he was right about Horsfield! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royston. Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 If people ask, I'll tell. Mind you, is a public football forum really the place to share my expert opinions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City Fan Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 If we bought Eastwood that would be the whole budget gone no doubt, which means no midfielders so would be worthless with no service. And besides, haven't we got enough pikeys in Leicester? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultra Posted 23 May 2007 Share Posted 23 May 2007 If we bought Eastwood that would be the whole budget gone no doubt, Unless we flogged Hume or Kisnorbo. I'm not convinced Hume and Eastwood would be the right combination up front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheese Me Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 Sorry but Trevor Sinclair is quality and would still walk into our team. Eastwood, yes please but difficult to see it happenning. Nice to see the rumours coming through though and the calibre of the players we're linked with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 Unless we flogged Hume or Kisnorbo.I'm not convinced Hume and Eastwood would be the right combination up front. I think you're probably right there. If Eastwood came, I could see Hume either being pushed out wide or being got rid of. Or perhaps he'll just have to fight for his place, Hume is surely the only striker that's proved some sort of worth at Leicester last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicfox Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 Sorry but Trevor Sinclair is quality and would still walk into our team.Eastwood, yes please but difficult to see it happenning. Nice to see the rumours coming through though and the calibre of the players we're linked with. I unsure with Trev, i've been a fan of his since his Blackpool days but i was amazed he still got a game at the top level as he has been looking past it, and on the whole i'd say the Championship is alot faster paced and more physical than the prem, albeit he still does have ability and that touch of class that still might warrant him doing well for us. Undecided. Freddy Eastwood - Can't see him coming here so won't comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STUHILL Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 It all depends on how well Trev has aged, if he has looked after himself, then I think he could still do a job for us for a year! He has to be better than the players we have! I would take a risk on him. Eastwood would be our biggest signing and probably cost close to 2million maybe more. If MM wants a Premiership push tho, then these are the kind of players we will need! He is not a Prem striker yet, so I do think he will go to a Championship club! Why not us?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 I think we'll see possibly one sizeable money signing and then build a team around that player with what we've got and plenty of free transfers. The potential strike force of Eastwood and Todorov would be outstanding. I still think we should find room for Hume on the right wing next season if we do get 2 good strikers in. Eastwood's value although should increase from last summer due to proving he's got what it takes at a higher level, will possibly have dropped from the figures being mentioned last summer. He'd be cheaper than Billy Sharpe, who's the new kid on the block that everyone likes to be linked with. Eastwood could be got for under £2 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eaststandtom Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 I think we'll see possibly one sizeable money signing and then build a team around that player with what we've got and plenty of free transfers.The potential strike force of Eastwood and Todorov would be outstanding. I still think we should find room for Hume on the right wing next season if we do get 2 good strikers in. Eastwood's value although should increase from last summer due to proving he's got what it takes at a higher level, will possibly have dropped from the figures being mentioned last summer. He'd be cheaper than Billy Sharpe, who's the new kid on the block that everyone likes to be linked with. Eastwood could be got for under £2 million. £2 million is madness 14 championship goals thats all!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEBIGJOHNSTEADER; Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 £2 million is madness 14 championship goals thats all!!! for a team relegated? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soley118 Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 Yes we should go for both of them!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluefoxtim Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 £2 million is madness 14 championship goals thats all!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieWorthoYaggedMyWife Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 Imagine: Eastwood Todorov Hume Fyatt Cresswell Wankstatic!!!! You know full well we will still be stuck with fat boy de Vries and wideboy "tssst" Elvis! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEBIGJOHNSTEADER; Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 Imagine:Eastwood Todorov Hume Fyatt Cresswell Wankstatic!!!! You know full well we will still be stuck with fat boy de Vries and wideboy "tssst" Elvis! Eastwood and Todorov upfront and Hume tucked in behind. Spunk all over the place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finnegan Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 And besides, haven't we got enough pikeys in Leicester? That just made me choke on my cheesecake. True story. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Fox Posted 24 May 2007 Share Posted 24 May 2007 Imagine:Eastwood Todorov Hume Fyatt Cresswell Wankstatic!!!! You know full well we will still be stuck with fat boy de Vries and wideboy "tssst" Elvis! Elvis is the black Wayne Rooney according Thracian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.