Manwell Pablo Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 So? It's not polite to turn up to places when your not invited.
Master Fox Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 I am a complete moron and consider myself to be stupid...where does that leave me?Huh? Huh? Walkers Stadium, Thursday, 7pm seat no.44. Arrive early for Birch’s pre-MM speech jokes.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 It's not polite to turn up to places when your not invited. Okay. I'm going to ask him why I shouldn't cancel my pre-order for various away tickets this season and what the f**k is going on with Kaebi.
Manwell Pablo Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 Okay.I'm going to ask him why I shouldn't cancel my pre-order for various away tickets this season and what the f**k is going on with Kaebi. Thats not why he's holding the meeting! You'll probabley get given some crap about him settling and his need to learn the language etc etc bull shit bull shit bull shit anyway. I'd like to ask him wtf is going on with alot of things but I wont get straight replys out him unfortunatley. Bet he's regretting getting involved already on some level.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 Thats not why he's holding the meeting! You'll probabley get given some crap about him settling and his need to learn the language etc etc bull shit bull shit bull shit anyway. I'd like to ask him wtf is going on with alot of things but I wont get straight replys out him unfortunatley. Bet he's regretting getting involved already on some level. Maybe he could teach Kisnorbo and McAuley to communicate with each other in his language cos English got them nowhere fast on Saturday.
Daggers Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 I've been saying - no one on the pitch is communicating. As much as people sing Clem's praises, he's not barking at people.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 I've been saying - no one on the pitch is communicating.As much as people sing Clem's praises, he's not barking at people. Disagree with that. He does bark at people. Certainly was on Saturday at the defence. But no matter how much you shout at the likes of Stearman and Sheehan, they're not going to suddenly become better players.
Fox in a Box Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 I've been saying - no one on the pitch is communicating.As much as people sing Clem's praises, he's not barking at people. Is clem a dog then? woof woof!
The People's Hero Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 I've been saying - no one on the pitch is communicating.As much as people sing Clem's praises, he's not barking at people. No but he has the basic motor skills and ball skills which all our other players lack. And we have to start somewhere. Besides, he's probably given up shouting. We've got a squad full of tools. Complete tools.
The People's Hero Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 Disagree with that. He does bark at people. Certainly was on Saturday at the defence. But no matter how much you shout at the likes of Stearman and Sheehan, they're not going to suddenly become better players. He did first half, he seemed to completely give up on shouting second half. Taggs had a good shout at Sheehan too, for the full 10 minutes he managed by the pitch!
Kilworthfox Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 Just to answer the topic question A few fans show their displeasure at what has happened at the club and that is their song to announce their displeasure. I believe that the cloak and dagger way which the episode was handled did not help, the New manager has not inspired, the players look as bad as they did last year, and the results have nose dived so that = Allen songs to show disapproval as things looked different under him! we looked as if we were building towards a better future, even the Mandaric supporters must recognize these obvious events.
harry Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 Milan Mandaric said 'if you chanted for Martin Allen then come and see me face to face'. He is throwing down the gauntlet, saying 'are you man enough to tell me you're unhappy with what I'm doing?' If you want to complain you should be man enough to go, that isn't idiocy it's honesty. If you don't even go asking for the answers, don't complain when you don't get them. If no more than 100 or so people turn up, Mandaric will use that against the 'boo boys' forever. And so will Bill Anderson, in fact, it will probably make Bill Anderson's millennium, proving once and for all that the same people who once chanted against him - if you can remember that far back - are spineless and only capable of voicing opinions from the safety of numbers. If you're unhappy or you want your questions answering, take up this invitation, because your presence is important. For that reason I'll be there. Remember Mandaric needs the fans behind them. And no it's not unreasonable to be chanting Martin Allen's name, not if you spent a lot of money buying season tickets to see an up and at 'em Martin Allen side, rather than a Gary Megson team which takes a striker off for a defender when we're 2-0 down. Not if you felt upbeat about a side who'd hammered one of the league's best sides 4-1, only to have all that shattered because Mandaric didn't like Allen very much. This isn't Mandaric's money we're talking about, it's our money. And if we stop spending our money, it's not going to help the chairman either. Leicester City will survive, one way or the other. This man is a custodian. Now, for once, it's those defending the chairman who are being irrational. Normally it's the moaners and groaners, but let's look at this objectively. I'm not going to jump on Megson's back, it's far too early in the day for that, even though he's clearly that rare type of boss who blags supposedly good jobs with a very questionable track record. Yet Mandaric hasn't overwhelmed us with quality signings, no more than our old board did in 2004. He's promised us something, taken our money and moved the goalposts. Now we have 6 points from 6 games. That's the reality. What, exactly, should we be so very thankful about? And should we accept being accused of poisoning the club, just because we disapprove of Mandaric's actions? Those chants didn't get us in the situation we're in now, but the chairman's erratic decision making and failure to put his money where his mouth is most certainly did. And as for Anderson, you get more truth out of Goebbels.
Micky Ruddle Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 I've been saying - no one on the pitch is communicating.As much as people sing Clem's praises, he's not barking at people. Thats true. Fulop, McAuley and Kisnorbo is one example.
Kilworthfox Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 Milan Mandaric said 'if you chanted for Martin Allen then come and see me face to face'. He is throwing down the gauntlet, saying 'are you man enough to tell me you're unhappy with what I'm doing?'If you want to complain you should be man enough to go, that isn't idiocy it's honesty. If you don't even go asking for the answers, don't complain when you don't get them. If no more than 100 or so people turn up, Mandaric will use that against the 'boo boys' forever. And so will Bill Anderson, in fact, it will probably make Bill Anderson's millennium, proving once and for all that the same people who once chanted against him - if you can remember that far back - are spineless and only capable of voicing opinions from the safety of numbers. If you're unhappy or you want your questions answering, take up this invitation, because your presence is important. For that reason I'll be there. Remember Mandaric needs the fans behind them. And no it's not unreasonable to be chanting Martin Allen's name, not if you spent a lot of money buying season tickets to see an up and at 'em Martin Allen side, rather than a Gary Megson team which takes a striker off for a defender when we're 2-0 down. Not if you felt upbeat about a side who'd hammered one of the league's best sides 4-1, only to have all that shattered because Mandaric didn't like Allen very much. This isn't Mandaric's money we're talking about, it's our money. And if we stop spending our money, it's not going to help the chairman either. Leicester City will survive, one way or the other. This man is a custodian. Now, for once, it's those defending the chairman who are being irrational. Normally it's the moaners and groaners, but let's look at this objectively. I'm not going to jump on Megson's back, it's far too early in the day for that, even though he's clearly that rare type of boss who blags supposedly good jobs with a very questionable track record. Yet Mandaric hasn't overwhelmed us with quality signings, no more than our old board did in 2004. He's promised us something, taken our money and moved the goalposts. Now we have 6 points from 6 games. That's the reality. What, exactly, should we be so very thankful about? And should we accept being accused of poisoning the club, just because we disapprove of Mandaric's actions? Those chants didn't get us in the situation we're in now, but the chairman's erratic decision making and failure to put his money where his mouth is most certainly did. And as for Anderson, you get more truth out of Goebbels. I'm gonna be there to not because I sang the song but because I agree what the disappointment that those who did feel in the moment it was sung. Ps Blanderson is a tw4t
Guest Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 I'm going, but that's because I am a nosy cow.
Simi Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 I'm going, but that's because I am a nosy cow. I can't wait to see Tim Davies sticking up for his God, Milan.
Guest Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 I can't wait to see Tim Davies sticking up for his God, Milan. You've never seen them playing tennis together.
Simi Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 You've never seen them playing tennis together. Ha. My mate actually has down at Leicestershire! The one year I don't go, he's there.
Ultra Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 Milan Mandaric said 'if you chanted for Martin Allen then come and see me face to face'. He is throwing down the gauntlet, saying 'are you man enough to tell me you're unhappy with what I'm doing?'If you want to complain you should be man enough to go, that isn't idiocy it's honesty. If you don't even go asking for the answers, don't complain when you don't get them. If no more than 100 or so people turn up, Mandaric will use that against the 'boo boys' forever. And so will Bill Anderson, in fact, it will probably make Bill Anderson's millennium, proving once and for all that the same people who once chanted against him - if you can remember that far back - are spineless and only capable of voicing opinions from the safety of numbers. If you're unhappy or you want your questions answering, take up this invitation, because your presence is important. For that reason I'll be there. Remember Mandaric needs the fans behind them. And no it's not unreasonable to be chanting Martin Allen's name, not if you spent a lot of money buying season tickets to see an up and at 'em Martin Allen side, rather than a Gary Megson team which takes a striker off for a defender when we're 2-0 down. Not if you felt upbeat about a side who'd hammered one of the league's best sides 4-1, only to have all that shattered because Mandaric didn't like Allen very much. This isn't Mandaric's money we're talking about, it's our money. And if we stop spending our money, it's not going to help the chairman either. Leicester City will survive, one way or the other. This man is a custodian. Now, for once, it's those defending the chairman who are being irrational. Normally it's the moaners and groaners, but let's look at this objectively. I'm not going to jump on Megson's back, it's far too early in the day for that, even though he's clearly that rare type of boss who blags supposedly good jobs with a very questionable track record. Yet Mandaric hasn't overwhelmed us with quality signings, no more than our old board did in 2004. He's promised us something, taken our money and moved the goalposts. Now we have 6 points from 6 games. That's the reality. What, exactly, should we be so very thankful about? And should we accept being accused of poisoning the club, just because we disapprove of Mandaric's actions? Those chants didn't get us in the situation we're in now, but the chairman's erratic decision making and failure to put his money where his mouth is most certainly did. And as for Anderson, you get more truth out of Goebbels. Spot on.. One win in nine home games since Mandaric took over is not good enough, though it hasn't helped having FOUR different managers in that spell. It's now time for him to deliver. Posturing in Pravda (aka the Mercury) isn't gonna cut it any more.
Kilworthfox Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 Spot on.. One win in nine home games since Mandaric took over is not good enough, though it hasn't helped having FOUR different managers in that spell. It's now time for him to deliver. Posturing in Pravda (aka the Mercury) isn't gonna cut it any more.
Sods Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 I think evryone should go, stand up and sing. Milan, Milan Mandaric. He would be shocked and then it might start a great relationship. - Yeah maybe that was a twatish comment
lcfc_thefoxes Posted 24 September 2007 Posted 24 September 2007 WAIT!!!! RESULT, it shows leicester fans can actually sing...
Thracian Posted 25 September 2007 Posted 25 September 2007 Disagree with that. He does bark at people. Certainly was on Saturday at the defence. But no matter how much you shout at the likes of Stearman and Sheehan, they're not going to suddenly become better players. Another who wants to reduce every problem down to the kids. Why not bawl at the likes of Kisnorbo and McAuley? After all McAuley's boobed for two matches running. What's really needed at our club is vision, leadership, stability and common sense. Players who created 20-odd chances against Blackpool and beat Watford 4-1 are not without ability. But playing people out of position in a side that barely knows each other is close to lunacy. So is having a fundamentally defensive strategy when the club is essentially full of attacking players. Home or away the players don't change. Our first major problem Saturday was the loss of Wesolowski - a youngster. We didn't address that problem sensibly at all. As DavieG so rightly pointed out last night Chambers is arguably our best attacking right-back but has played there only once. Ridiculous. Stearman has looked far more comfortable and effective as a centre-back than a right-back yet, despite our problems in the heart of our defence, he never plays there. You single out young players for criticism but if you give three points for a goal and one for an assist Sheehan would be top of the list. That's not to elevate his contribution at all. But what the hell have Cort, Newton, Kishishev, McAuley - all vastly experienced players - done for our cause this season. Why not have a go at them? Second thoughts don't. All are decent players, no question, and lambasting any player is counter productive. Alan Pardew is right when he says that team (and club) spirit is the most vital element of success. But all we've got is upheaval at first team level yet what a contrast last night with the reserves. There weren't ever going to be eight players underperforming in that side - I reckon we must have had six shots in the first 10 minutes and around 25 in the first half alone. Everyone, young and old, played his part with enthusiasm and commitment. Someone said WBA weren't much of a side. Well they had Hartson and Bednar up front and we had only three older players apart from the first 10 minutes - Maybury, Kenton and Ferreira. And Ferrerra was replaced after 35 minutes. Five of our players were existing or recent Academy graduates, six when Ferreira went and seven when Chambers came on second half. Yet together there was a unity of spirit which was so refreshing. A team simply focused on trying to win a game by scoring more goals than the opposition over 90 minutes. People hung around afterwards to give them a standing ovation and they deserved it. City won the match and the fans were thoroughly entertained. Steve Beaglehole and Mike Stowell did appear on the sidelines to offer timely advice. But essentially they let the team play and express themselves. Both were focused on simply getting the best out of everyone. There was no thought of anyone being "much of a muchness". And before anyone gets the impression it was all pretty, pretty against inadequate opposition I remember Maybury diving in at considerable risk to himself to block a goalbound shot - minutes from the end when we were leading 3-0. And McKay chasing 30 yards to close a defender down, then 20 yards to close the keeper, then another 20 to confront their right-back and finally forcing WBA to oncede a throw in near their own goalline. Again the match was long won. He did it because that was the spirit instilled into the side. People complain that I won't hear a word against our youngsters. That's dead right. And a manager of our club should be even worse. Cos he shouldn't have a bad word against anyone. Not in public. Not ever. All the players should know he has faith in them and that he's the one person they could trust with their life to stand alongside them. That if they failed he'd fail. That there'd be no shifting the blame as Megson seems to do. Then perhaps they wouldn't fail. Perhaps they'd stand tall and do the club proud. I've seen their capabilities lots of times and I saw some more last night. City's players can beat Watford and anyone else in the sodding Championship given the right inspiration. How anyone can oversee eight players underperforming at once in the same match I don't know. It's miserable. We need someone to put a smile back. And we don't need negative 1-0's. Even SGE says he's going to attack more. You're going to meet us all Thursday Mr Mandaric. Time enough to see the light I hope.
Manwell Pablo Posted 25 September 2007 Posted 25 September 2007 My word. The fact that Stearman and Sheehan are both youngsters are inconcequential. It's the fact that they both aren't our best options. Stearmans not that badder player but I don't see room for him in the team, Sheehans just a left foot.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.