Thracian Posted 12 February 2008 Author Posted 12 February 2008 An object lesson in how to take an internet forum too seriously.We argue amongst ourselves often enough - as often as Ultra, Thracian, Valerenga and davieG do at any rate. This is like an inferiority complex. Subtle remark.
Thracian Posted 12 February 2008 Author Posted 12 February 2008 I didn't start up an areguement AT ALL. Just posted my opinion on what the current problem with this forum is? Regards Probably the main culprit Perhaps my guard's slipping!
davieG Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 Careful Tommy G - they'll have you for that.I've just be reading today Top twenty Posters - it's like a Swan Vestas Convention. Five in the top 10 and perhaps eight overall if you count associates/nomineees I even asked DavieG how the Debating Section's voting would work out with the SV's likely to post a bloc vote if one of their own proposes/opposes a motion. I don't recall that, but in any case based on the many polls taken on here I wouldn't take the outcome of this one too seriously.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 I rarely argue with anyone, and thus rarely back them up.Why? Because arguing is a sign that people are taking the internet far too seriously. In fact, if you look back in this thread you will see me responding to TPH's posts telling him that he's taking it too seriously. Now if you'll excuse me I have some more ridiculous posting to do. Good day. Oh no they aren't!
Trav Le Bleu Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 By the way... a Swan Lesta is? Or does my definition still stand?
Thracian Posted 12 February 2008 Author Posted 12 February 2008 I don't recall that, but in any case based on the many polls taken on here I wouldn't take the outcome of this one too seriously. Last time I looked Manwell and TPH had voiced their views. I won't ask you to guess which way. Will even one Swan Lesta step outside the clan and vote for Ultra on such a fundamental issue? I'll watch with interest. If I can, that is. One's never too sure these days.
Alexikokopops Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 Last time I looked Manwell and TPH had voiced their views. I won't ask you to guess which way. Careful or else this will head towards the realm of seriousness again. If that happens I shall be forced to edit everyone's posts and replace them with ridiculous pictures of animals It's a unique moderating style, time consuming, but I feel everyone benefits.
Manwell Pablo Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 Last time I looked Manwell and TPH had voiced their views. I won't ask you to guess which way. Will even one Swan Lesta step outside the clan and vote for Ultra on such a fundamental issue? I'll watch with interest. If I can, that is. One's never too sure these days. I think you'll find I said I didn't understand where Ultra was coming from and alot of his arguement seemed irrelevent which IMO it does. I don't remember saying anything about Hullfoxs statement, mainly because I'm totally against testing voters.
Sods Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 I think it's because he's going a little bit mad. Shush! You Swan Vesta.
Finnegan Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 1. What's a Swan Lesta? 2. Am I one? 3. Why are they called Swan Lestas? 4. fook off, you dizzy old ****.
Sods Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 1. What's a Swan Lesta? 2. Am I one? 3. Why are they called Swan Lestas? 4. fook off, you dizzy old ****. 1. Jason Koumas whore. 2. Of course. 3. His pornstar name. 4. Cheers.
Daggers Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 1. What's a Swan Lesta?2. Am I one? 3. Why are they called Swan Lestas? 4. fook off, you dizzy old ****. TERRITORIO ZAPATISTA, huh? Aie Dios mio!
Finnegan Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 TERRITORIO ZAPATISTA, huh?Aie Dios mio! Wondered how long that'd take you.
Daggers Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 Wondered how long that'd take you. Wonder no longer - just 90 seconds. Which, as far as being timed goes, is about par for the course for me. My middle name is Predictable. And Obvious. And Stupid. Which makes it slightly better than Raj's.
Finnegan Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 Wonder no longer - just 90 seconds. Which, as far as being timed goes, is about par for the course for me.My middle name is Predictable. And Obvious. And Stupid. Which makes it slightly better than Raj's. Actually I changed it last night, pre-Jake Burns epiphany.
Alexikokopops Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 Aha! I've already used that one today! In the banned/leaving thread I believe.
Raj Posted 12 February 2008 Posted 12 February 2008 \ Daggers...stop doing that shit! I actually tried pressing YES!!!! fcuk i should concentrate more at work!! Im logging off til later Up the City!!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.