Number 6 Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 I think Manderic didn't fully think about who he would be able to attract to the club before sacking Holloway, simple as.
Dr The Singh Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Pearson over Holloway? Holloway had to go, he was a failure!! In his search for a new manager, with the influence of a former SOuthampton chariman, Pearson must have been possibly the best choice!!
Kilworthfox Posted 20 June 2008 Author Posted 20 June 2008 I think Manderic didn't fully think about who he would be able to attract to the club before sacking Holloway, simple as. Jesus I hope your wrong! Well your sacked....... Oh fook me I have to appoint someone! I doubt that happened
Jay Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Pearson over Holloway? Holloway failed taking us to our lowest ever level ever that's the only reason needed.
Flynny Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Basically, we couldn't really be managed by the bloke who got us relegated, could we? So he's hired the other bloke who got us relegated.
Webbo Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Holloway failed taking us to our lowest ever level ever that's the only reason needed. So far.
Daggers Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Jesus I hope your wrong!Well your sacked....... Oh fook me I have to appoint someone! I doubt that happened Change your name back now - this one pisses me off.
Kilworthfox Posted 20 June 2008 Author Posted 20 June 2008 Change your name back now - this one pisses me off. Why have you figured it yet? Basically, we couldn't really be managed by the bloke who got us relegated, could we? So he's hired the other bloke who got us relegated. is that why we fired Adams, it just took longer to realise he was still our manager?
Daggers Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Why have you figured it yet? Figured what? And I hate your twatty little avatar. Kilworth! Sort it out! Kilworth! Kilworth! Sort it out!
Kilworthfox Posted 20 June 2008 Author Posted 20 June 2008 Figured what?And I hate your twatty little avatar. Kilworth! Sort it out! Kilworth! Kilworth! Sort it out! Bloody Red Commie Mr Enrich is brill
Chairman of the Bored Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Hollowhead was a clown, he had to go. No reason to keep him unlike some clubs that have gone down and kept their manager (e.g Bournemouth - Bond) because they realised the fates conspired against them. Hollowhead had time and money and wasted both.
Houdini Logic Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Pearson over Holloway? Because Holloway's tactics were awful. If Holloway was still here he'd be upset that our best striker has left (McCauley)
Daggers Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 the creator of the thread is an moron He's a big twat.
Nod.E Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 the title of the thread is an oxymoron Mandaric and Reasoning do have their differences at times.
Hullfox Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 In the press conference, MM intimated that Pearson could handle pressure and Holloway couldn't. At least that's what I read into it, probably said nothing of the sort really.
Daggers Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 In the press conference, MM intimated that Pearson could handle pressure and Holloway couldn't. I don't trust a thing that drips from his mouth.
dandannieldanok Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Pearson over Holloway? Because Pearson is a straight-talker and has shown at Southampton that he's capable of simply knuckling down to the job rather than constantly being in the media spotlight. Holloway failed taking us to our lowest ever level ever that's the only reason needed. And this of course.
Father Ted Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Pearson over Holloway? Holloway needed to get back to his farm and combine harvester.
Staf Posted 20 June 2008 Posted 20 June 2008 Probably would rather have Pearson because if Holloway stayed we people would be saying he should of gone and he was the first manager to send us down so yes i think i would rather have Pearson.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.