Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
davieG

Sex laws are 'unfair to teachers'

By davieG, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

hairy

hairy

Posted
Posted
It's always some fat spotty kid and a lard arse teacher.

You never get the school milf.

Bloody society.

Incorrect. Introducing Debra Lafave

debra_lafave10_350.jpg

debra-lafave.jpg

Lafave, a Tampa, Florida middle school teacher who made the top ten list of teachers who had sex with their students, pleaded guilty to two counts of lewd and lascivious battery of a 14-year-old male student. After the judge rejected a plea deal arranged by Lafave's lawyers and the prosecutor, the case imploded with the prosecutor dropping all charges.
lookwhaticando

lookwhaticando

Posted
Posted
"Hmmm," thinks teacher "I wonder if cumming on her tits crosses the line?"
If a teacher you had a little bit of crush on, came onto you at 16/17, chances are your not going to turn her down.

You could tell 'em they just crossed the line though.

For their future reference, at least.

And to extract a hefty bribe. :thumbup:

Thracian

Thracian

Posted
Posted
Obviously if the teacher was a 6'4'' PE teacher with muscles in his shit then I'd be very unlikely to be able to carry out my threat. However I'd do my best to see him prosecuted/sacked.

22 would be the minimum age it could be just as likely in the 30s/40s. You would have to ask yourself why a grown man would target a 16 year old in the first place. There were a lot of 15/16/17 year old girls hanging around the pool on holiday this year, in all honesty if I ogled anyone it was their mothers.

Could it be that a teacher could be just taking advantage of the naivety of young girls? Perhaps he tries it on with a different girl every year and just sees it as a perk of the job, dumping these girls when he's had what he wants? That's the kind of heartbreak that every father wants to stop.

As for Catherine Zeta Jones, when girls get to a certain age, probably around 18/20, then they have to make their own mistakes and they probably wouldn't listen to their parents anyway.

Nothing against the mothers at all. But hold on a minute, who says it is the teacher doing the chasing? If you are truly unaware of how cleverly seductive 16/17 year old girls can be then you've lived a sheltered life.

Of course the teacher, he or she, could be taking advantage, and I've already referred to the responsibility they have and should probably accept. But is it necessarily so when the ages could be quite close and when feelings can sometimes transcend all sorts of things?

And, given that girls of 16/17 can be disarmingly mature, persistent and masters of the art of seduction, does being tempted make a teacher a criminal anyway?

Stupid, gullible, naive, blinkered, vulnerable, reckless, selfish, irresponsible, weak-willed, unprofessional and kidding themselves, maybe. But criminal?

To me the whole issue is full of grey areas.

But making a classroom teacher a criminal for something that wouldn't make a criminal out of a dance studio or gym instructor, nor any other adult with designated power over and responsibility for girls and boys of 16+, seems fundamentally wrong to me.

Webbo

Webbo

Posted
Posted
But hold on a minute, who says it is the teacher doing the chasing? If you are truly unaware of how cleverly seductive 16/17 year old girls can be then you've lived a sheltered life.

I'm also aware how stupid they are, as we all are at that age. Just because a 16 year old makes the running doesn't make it all right any more than it would if it was a well developed 14/15 year old. The teachers are the grown ups in this situation and should know better.

Thracian

Thracian

Posted
Posted
I'm also aware how stupid they are, as we all are at that age. Just because a 16 year old makes the running doesn't make it all right any more than it would if it was a well developed 14/15 year old. The teachers are the grown ups in this situation and should know better.

Unfortunately the ability of people to be stupid doesn't begin at birth and end at 16. Nor does sound judgement click in at 16.

I've agreed that teachers should know better and act responsibly. I've merely said that failure to do so shouldn't make them criminals and especially if others who are also in a position of responsibility are not made criminals by doing the same thing.

Physical development isn't the issue. The law protects those under 16. But if you want to argue that the age of consent is too young because you don't think teenagers of 16 can cope with making adult decisions and judgements then that is another matter entirely.

However sooner or later your kids and my kids have to be responsible for their own actions and how good they are at that will probably depend as much on the input of their parents as the pressure they get from unsuitable suitors.

Thracian

Thracian

Posted
Posted

Daggers:

QUOTE (Thracian @ Oct 7 2008, 04:35 PM) *

And, given that girls of 16/17 can be disarmingly mature, persistent and masters of the art of seduction...

"Did you say you were going back into teaching?"

---

I went through all that 35/40 years ago. The sixth form girls in Peterborough and Uppingham could have modelled for Britain but I just about managed to keep my eyes to the front! I'm pretty sure the batteries have run compltely flat now.

Daggers

Daggers

Posted
Posted
"Did you say you were going back into teaching?"

Primary :thumbup:

It is my delight to bring boredom and mundanity to young children, someone has to put them off education for life so it may as well be me. :cool:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...