fox123 Posted 20 November 2008 Author Posted 20 November 2008 Pick the post to pieces if that makes you feel some what more intelligent, I really don't care. I care about the sickening posts that were posted. Stez I couldn't PM because I was blocked. I'm not going to revert to insult, unlike you lot I don't get a kick out of it.
Corky Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 Without sticking up for Fox 123 in any way shape or form. I honestly felt uncomfortable by some of the things Daggers was saying, I know he's joking, I know this but even so it was getting a bit near the knuckle and it's really not necessary but no way does this make him a potential pedophile, that's ridiculous. Daggs has the capacity to make people's lives hell in other areas so I would stick with that. Feel free to alienate me for not following the general consensus but I felt it needed to be said. I know what you are saying Katy, but the others, to be honest, were playing right into his hands. Daggers maybe went a bit over-the-top but there was no call for the accusations against him.
The People's Hero Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 Are we all coming out now? Besides, consider this... if children weren't so sexy, pedoismology wouldn't be an issue at all. Hit your kids in the face with a spade. Job done.
SOCCERROO FOX Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 I actually haven't posted about the topic yet........if i was under the age of 18 i would do Daggers
Milky Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 :laugh: which thread was this and what happened?
Katy Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 I know what you are saying Katy, but the others, to be honest, were playing right into his hands.Daggers maybe went a bit over-the-top but there was no call for the accusations against him. Oh God of course not. If someone started making suggestions about my daughter then I think I would have reacted in the same way to be honest and if everyone else is honest then so would they.
Corky Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 Oh God of course not. If someone started making suggestions about my daughter then I think I would have reacted in the same way to be honest and if everyone else is honest then so would they. If I'm honest, yes I probably would.
Daggers Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 I know what you are saying Katy, but the others, to be honest, were playing right into his hands.Daggers maybe went a bit over-the-top but there was no call for the accusations against him. I couldn't give a toss what he called me to be honest Cork's - he, like anyone else, is perfectly at liberty to place people he doesn't want to read on 'ignore'. The fact that they don't and feel pressed to whine just opens them up to more ridicule and piss-taking. He can call me a donkey-raping ginger peado with Aids, random internet ****** mean nothing. If it had come from any of the lovely people on here I've met and drank with then that would have upset me...and in that vein I've apologised to Katy if she was offended. 123fox, on the other hand, can suck my ring (which is something I believe he does for cash). I actually haven't posted about the topic yet........if i was under the age of 18 i would do Daggers I have standards. They may be low but I still have them.
Daggers Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 Oh God of course not. If someone started making suggestions about my daughter then I think I would have reacted in the same way to be honest and if everyone else is honest then so would they. No, in all honesty, because I can tell the difference between reality and internet banter. But it comes down to respect - and I hold you in a great deal more respect than I reserve for these insignificant little people with no sense of humour.
fox123 Posted 20 November 2008 Author Posted 20 November 2008 I couldn't give a toss what he called me to be honest Cork's - he, like anyone else, is perfectly at liberty to place people he doesn't want to read on 'ignore'. The fact that they don't and feel pressed to whine just opens them up to more ridicule and piss-taking.He can call me a donkey-raping ginger peado with Aids, random internet ****** mean nothing. If it had come from any of the lovely people on here I've met and drank with then that would have upset me...and in that vein I've apologised to Katy if she was offended. 123fox, on the other hand, can suck my ring (which is something I believe he does for cash). I have standards. They may be low but I still have them. Yet you can still only resort to insults. Playground behaviour seems to suit your style.
SOCCERROO FOX Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 I have standards. They may be low but I still have them. So is that a yes then
Kilworthfox Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 What the fook's going on in here you ****s?
Alexikokopops Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 Pick the post to pieces if that makes you feel some what more intelligent, I really don't care. I care about the sickening posts that were posted.Stez I couldn't PM because I was blocked. I'm not going to revert to insult, unlike you lot I don't get a kick out of it. Well if that isn't potential paedophilia then I don't know what is
Alexikokopops Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 Yet you can still only resort to insults. Playground behaviour seems to suit your style. The man's a potential paedophile, what do you expect?
fox123 Posted 20 November 2008 Author Posted 20 November 2008 No, in all honesty, because I can tell the difference between reality and internet banter.But it comes down to respect - and I hold you in a great deal more respect than I reserve for these insignificant little people with no sense of humour. It's amazing that majority of posters put little emoticons like by their (joke) posts, yet you don't and seem to see how far you can actually push it, too far this time.
James. Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 Well if that isn't potential paedophilia then I don't know what is Superb. Oh,
Katy Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 No, in all honesty, because I can tell the difference between reality and internet banter.But it comes down to respect - and I hold you in a great deal more respect than I reserve for these insignificant little people with no sense of humour. Thanks Daggs, I appreciate that and you PMing me You're right though, if someone I did know did that then I would see it as a joke but not if it was someone I didn't know.
fox123 Posted 20 November 2008 Author Posted 20 November 2008 Well if that isn't potential paedophilia then I don't know what is You clearly don't have kids do you.
Daggers Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 You clearly don't have kids do you. Have you had any?
The People's Hero Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 You clearly don't have kids do you. No, they took them off him - don't you listen, THE MAN IS A POTENTIAL PAEDOPHILE FOR GOD'S SAKE.
fox123 Posted 20 November 2008 Author Posted 20 November 2008 Have you had any? Yes a daughter actually
The People's Hero Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 I had some of that paedophilia the other night on a bagel with a few sliced tomatoes and some black pepper. Admittedly, it could have done with a bit of meat, but on the whole, it was ok. Mediocre. 6/10. Don't see what all the fuss is about.
Alexikokopops Posted 20 November 2008 Posted 20 November 2008 You clearly don't have kids do you. All the people of Foxes Talk are my children. Except you. You take everything far too seriously.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.