Thracian Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Fooking deflections.... Done us a favour. The sooner Chambers and Porter get on and we just get the fixture behind us the better. Be nice if Gradel could score though.
Darkzzz_ Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Don't you just love it when commentators know what the managers are saying to the players. Now they have skills.
Thracian Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Scannell was a known force and we did nothing about him. At least we can concentrate on the League now. I wonder if Porter has caught the train home?
StaffordFoxed Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 No one wanted to go to Watford anyway......
colbo68 Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Fook this. thats that then - why dont he get the young uns on? no point now in playing Dickov/Howard in this fookin game!!!
Munzie Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Was was that thing about 2-0 leads are hard to defend?
ACF Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Oh well. Chuck Porter on for game time, thats all this game will be good for.
J.Lisemore Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Cant wait till we actually get a decent keeper. Never rated Martin and never will.
norfolkfox222 Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 ****KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK SAKKKKKKKKKKKKE im so pissed off i was really looking forward to seeing how we would get on with our full team out! Ok its risking injuries but come on beat these then Watford would of been good but o well lets just pray for no more injuries x
MC Prussian Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 This is the end... Well, if that wasn't an omen... We're officially fooked now. No Tunch, Fryatt still doubtful and Dickov's under a voodoo spell for quite some time. DJ's out on loan and Howard can't score a donkey on his own.
Libertine Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 No one wanted to go to Watford anyway...... I pissing did.
Jonezy Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Bad luck, bad day... Oh well, we were bound to have some them. Missing Tunch for some time will be a test, but I'm sure Nigel will figure it out. Heads up!
Thracian Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Oh well.Chuck Porter on for game time, thats all this game will be good for. Why would he want to play a meaningless finale with City 2-0 down? He should have been on from half-time especially the way Dickov and Berner seemed to be playing.
Libertine Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Well, if that wasn't an omen... We're officially fooked now. No Tunch, Fryatt still doubtful and Dickov's under a voodoo spell for quite some time. DJ's out on loan and Howard can't score a donkey on his own. Shit, it's all my fault.
turkish14 Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 At least we wont lose Tunch in the transfer window now.
Number 6 Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Why would he want to play a meaningless finale with City 2-0 down? He should have been on from half-time especially the way Dickov and Berner seemed to be playing. because he should want to show what he can offer this team maybe?
NorthernFox Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Why would he want to play a meaningless finale with City 2-0 down? He should have been on from half-time especially the way Dickov and Berner seemed to be playing. Hopefully with some pride in the shirt. I'm old school when I want to win every game, and I love the FA cup. If he comes on for anytime at all he should just give it all he's got......
ACF Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Why would he want to play a meaningless finale with City 2-0 down? He should have been on from half-time especially the way Dickov and Berner seemed to be playing. For a little confidence maybe, or so he can at least get some game time to prove to Pearson that he deserves a spot?
Darkzzz_ Posted 14 January 2009 Posted 14 January 2009 Come on Chambers. Show them something special.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.