accessory Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 Thankyou, Foxy, for doing my leg work for me. But he's just stalling. He's got to either admit that his entire argument is null, irrelevant and in completely the wrong thread or out himself as a racist, right-wing little bigot. It's been check mate for about four or so pages, so standard Thracian policy is to deflect for a good few whilst either waiting for his opponent to get bored, waiting for the thread to die out or preparing a latest eight-paragraph essay in an attempt to trigger an emotive enough response that someone will get sidetracked and give him an escape (with massive brownie-points every time the word 'diatribe' is overused.) Deflecting by accusing someone else of deflecting is also classic Thracian. Fortunately for myself, anyone with a smidge of reading comprehension and half a brain (anyone sad enough to be bothered, that is) can read or has read the thread and will know he isn't fooling anyone. I've nothing to prove here. Hell, the fact that even Webbo, Jon the Hat and co' want nothing to do with agreeing with him sort of speaks volumes. I think the word you're looking for is stalemate.. Meanwhile if Thracian, or anyone else, can prove that the "event" that kicked this whole thread off actually happened, they'll never have to buy a drink for the rest of the season..
Finnegan Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 The conversation stopped being about the 'event' on page one.
Dr The Singh Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 Ok, so I get Thracian's arguement about anti native or white racism, and Thrac you said you cannot see how Labours policies have effected Sikhs or any ethnics and in my last point I proved to you that we all are effected by Labour policies. Yes Thrac, there have been some policies for 'positive discrimination' for ethnics and we all admit they are wrong. But, in comparison to negative discrimination against ethnics by society and institutions as a whole, is far, far greater then a few postives by Labour. It's like comparing the steam of my piss against the puddle on on the floor......the steam becomes irrelevant in comparison!! You see Thrac, with all government policies, there are loser, winners and chumps. Now we all could go on some crusade, as a working man, i'm a loser on certain benefits etc, and I would be back of the queue for housing, etc. Yet a asylum seeker, is in the front of the queue. As a married couple I lose out to single parents in many benfits and yet I pay tax and i'm at the back of the queue.......and the list goes on, and on......................................i'm a chump, but flip the coin, there are people that would say different. SO to summarize, yes the white natives have had it hard, so has everyone else, yes there are some policies that maybe white negative only, which in reality is hardly gonna chenge the demographcs of society. But in comparison to societys and institutional negativity towards ethnics, this white native negativity is hardly a splash in the pond. Everyone is different and some have been bummed silly by the government and some have benefitted under labours regime, but this is neither colour or race definible. If we all start trying to 'protect our own' on colour or race etc, it will cause a divide, isolate society and cause more ignorance. If we can get passed, colour or race and tackle issues with common sense and realism we will be better off!!! EDIT FOR FoxyPV: Thrac, what would be best if the ethnics were allowed to pro-create with the native white females, that way the next generation no native white would suffer!! Bagsy Mrs Thrac in a threesome with FoxyPV's lady!!!!!!!!!!
FoxyPV Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 Singhy - some innuendo please to balance the seriousness and intelligence of this post.
Dr The Singh Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 Singhy - some innuendo please to balance the seriousness and intelligence of this post. Your wish is my command!!!
Tommy G Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 FAO FINNEGAN & THRACIAN I think I can speak for 90% of the people on here that they don't want to read (in every thread) an argument between yourselves on who is right and who is wrong. Whether is is about Race or Andy king there is always something to argue about. Could you either do it by private message or meet up for a debate because it is very boring and no-one else wants to see it. more to the point - have you even got lives spending hours on end a day arguing on here? FVck me - get out and about, ahve a game of 9 holes or a simple walk. If debating on here for 7 PAGES gives you a hard-on then in my opinion your lives must be pretty empty. Just makes both of you look like ****ing goons. I like Thrac's posts the majority of the time, but not when he is arguing with Craig Bellamy's #1 fan = Boring.
Zingari Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 i actually enjoy a good argument between thrac finners foxy etc , esp. with doc singh spicing it up i must be sadder than them
Dr The Singh Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 i actually enjoy a good argument between thrac finners foxy etc , esp. with doc singh spicing it up i must be sadder than them Same here, if people don't like it, they shouldn't bother entering the thread!!
MPH Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 I just love watching thracian make himself look stupid!
Tommy G Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 Same here, if people don't like it, they shouldn't bother entering the thread!! Yeh but it gets boring when you have to enter a thread and there is a personal argument going on, not just this thread? You trawl through it and get to the end and realise you have 10 mins of your life that you will nevr get back again.
Dr The Singh Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 Yeh but it gets boring when you have to enter a thread and there is a personal argument going on, not just this thread? You trawl through it and get to the end and realise you have 10 mins of your life that you will nevr get back again. To be honest, this Forum isn't the most serious of Forums is it. There's a large chunk of people that post shit in any thread. It's just how things go on here, sometimes some thread are delightful and entertaining and sometimes it's drudge, it's all in the fun!!!! I don't think most people are personally argueing, not them two anyway....i've drank with the both of em and i'm sure if they met in public they would be fine!!
FoxyPV Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 i actually enjoy a good argument between thrac finners foxy etc , esp. with doc singh spicing it up i must be sadder than them Hey! Don't drag me into this, I wasn't named by Tommeh.
Zingari Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 Hey! Don't drag me into this, I wasn't named by Tommeh. Iknow , but I thought I would " out you "
FoxyPV Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 Iknow , but I thought I would " out you " I haven't told the mrs about this yet - bastard
Finnegan Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 FAO TOMMY G: Foxes Talk has a wonderful, built-in ignore feature, feel free to use it. Failing that, simply avoid threads that are obviously going to be overtly political or argumentative, it isn't hard. Nobody's making you read it and, more importantly, nobody else's great conversation in here is being ruined. In short, grow up and jog on.
Zingari Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 To be honest, this Forum isn't the most serious of Forums is it. There's a large chunk of people that post shit in any thread. It's just how things go on here, sometimes some thread are delightful and entertaining and sometimes it's drudge, it's all in the fun!!!! I don't think most people are personally argueing, not them two anyway....i've drank with the both of em and i'm sure if they met in public they would be fine!! don't spoil my illusions , i rather imagined that should they meet , they would be indulging in rough angry brutal sex within minutes . with lots of slapping and scratching spoilsport !!!
Tommy G Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 FAO TOMMY G: Foxes Talk has a wonderful, built-in ignore feature, feel free to use it. Failing that, simply avoid threads that are obviously going to be overtly political or argumentative, it isn't hard. Nobody's making you read it and, more importantly, nobody else's great conversation in here is being ruined. In short, grow up and jog on. Not just in here is it? Seems to be in most threads. in short, you are an internet nerd
Zingari Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 my hearing's not that good , but i think he just called you a short interbred turd finners
Finnegan Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 Ah the good old Tommy G nerd-calling. It says far more about your own maturity and insecurity that you're still banding that about as an insult. What next, I'm skinny and have glasses? You comedy genius! And it clearly isn't every thread, is it chap? In fact it's been probably, literally, years since Thracian and I were really at each other. Two or three threads over the last month is hardly some FT-wide pandemic is it? Stop being silly.
The Doctor Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 I think if an actual racist crime takes place any time soon the internet will implode be easier to clean up than an explosion i reckon. Thracian's made a real fool of himself in this thread. All that talk about native britains and what not - the scots are irish pirates, the english (and probably welsh) are a combination of Italian (romans), Scandinavian (saxons + vikings), French (Normans). In fact if you believe science then we're all technically descended from Africans or the bible/other religions claim we're all descended from some deity's experiments in creating life.
Zingari Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 be easier to clean up than an explosion i reckon. Thracian's made a real fool of himself in this thread. All that talk about native britains and what not - the scots are irish pirates, the english (and probably welsh) are a combination of Italian (romans), Scandinavian (saxons + vikings), French (Normans). In fact if you believe science then we're all technically descended from Africans or the bible/other religions claim we're all descended from some deity's experiments in creating life. what about those of us that believe we have descended from spacemen from another planet ?
The Doctor Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 You're just wannabe Irish. you talking to me or Finnegan? because we're not wannabe Irish, we're the Irish that Ireland (and apparently Wales) didn't want.
Guest Bilo Posted 5 November 2010 Posted 5 November 2010 So does anybody else think that the forthcoming rise in university tuition fees constitute an attack on the meritocratic values of the British education system or what?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.