thybluefox Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 I really hope he plays upfront with Yakubu, the Yak's hold up play is wasted when there is no one running off him. My preferred team would be: Weale Naughton --- Bruma --- Bamba --- Van Aanholt|----------------------------------------------------|\/----------------------Abe-----------------------\/King ------------ Wellens<--- Gallagher --->Kamara --- Yakubu I like the look of that. When is Van Aahnolt back?
SMX11 Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 I really hope he plays upfront with Yakubu, the Yak's hold up play is wasted when there is no one running off him. My preferred team would be: Weale Naughton --- Bruma --- Bamba --- Van Aanholt|----------------------------------------------------|\/----------------------Abe-----------------------\/King ------------ Wellens<--- Gallagher --->Kamara --- Yakubu The problem I have with the diamond is that the full backs are exposed. The central midfielders get pulled all over the place trying to cover the wide positions and for me you need quick athletic central midfielders, which unfortunately we don't have.
Bert Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Just to let people know. KAMARA. NOT camara, camarra, cammarra, kammara, kamarra, kammarra.
Babylon Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Just to let people know. KAMARA. NOT camara, camarra, cammarra, kammara, kamarra, kammarra. What about... "shitty shitty wank wank, you're not Fryatt or Waghorn so I will boo you." Or is that his nickname?
Houdini Logic Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Love Dyer's pace but he just can't cross a football. Yeah shame really - he's one of the few modern players that know's where the byline is
Brainy Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Prove that. Prove that now. Show me one piece of evidence that supports that comment. I highly doubt that the likes of Rooney were good boys who listened to him anyway. I've read somewhere in the region of 10 of your posts and each one has been negative beyond comprehension, especially for a team in the top half of the table. It's so negative that it's as if you're actually not a fan at all. Perhaps you're a masked Forest fan, whose aim is purely to slag off everything LCFC. It's clear that you're on the wind up. Otherwise, you wouldn't have 'CITY WILL BE IN ADMINISTRATION AND BANKRUPT BY 2013.' as your sig. A signature is usually employed to express the personal interests of any respective poster. Sometimes it's even just a space in which posters can show some form of support to their team. The space, to you, is an opportunity to publish a message of doom and gloom. Not only that, but it's in capitals, just in case somebody might dare to miss it. You're an incredibly insecure, paranoid, schizophrenic maniac (the type that brandish conspiracies) and you cannot be at rest without alarming others of what is apparently going to happen imminently. That, or you're a sad, lonely man(?) with nothing better to do but to reek havoc and controversy on an internet forum. I just live in hope that, if you are actually a Leicester fan, I'll never find myself sat next to you, or anyone else as miserable as you for that matter, at a game. I'm not sure if it would be the constant whining or the invalidness of your comments that would get to me first. Though, given that my geographical and financial situation means I'll not be attending many games in the next few years, the chance I'll come across you is extremely slim, thankfully. Especially when you consider that you'll no doubt be too busy making plans for when the world 'ends' in 2012. Free speech is grand in general, but I think perhaps each case should be taken on it's merit. Also, people like you make me think capital punishment isn't all that bad. In future I'll stick to Alan Partridge style 'Oh, fvck off' comments. On this occasion, though, I just thought I'd take the liberty of speaking on behalf of the fraction of the forum that possesses both brain cells and a non-cretinous nature. Okay, so I've said enough now and I can say it; Just fvck off. Ta, Tom. cringe
thybluefox Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Yeah shame really - he's one of the few modern players that know's where the byline is Guess you'd have to say though that if he did know how to deliver a good ball, he wouldn't be playing for us.
tomtom Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 The problem I have with the diamond is that the full backs are exposed. The central midfielders get pulled all over the place trying to cover the wide positions and for me you need quick athletic central midfielders, which unfortunately we don't have. I'm astounded anybody would want to play the diamond formation,.. it might help shoe horn in our supposedly best midfielders into a formation but it completely lacks any width, without any width we are shocking and struggle to break teams down... like norwich at home
m00nie Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 ricardo Bruma --- Bamba ---Mee Naughton Abe Van Aanholt king wellens yakubu kamara
Guest Bilo Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 I didn't realise they did a degree in troll slaying? If they do, he's just got a First for that essay. Well done, Nod.E. It needed saying. This forum would be better without somebum and people like him, makes the LCFC sub-forum unreadable after anything other than a convincing win.
ibbosuk Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Another mistake, boy these thai guys are certainly paying to learn by throwing money at it... More money than brains... Roll on the end of a fvckin bad season.................
hackneyfox Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Roll on you stopping posting such reactionary bollocks. How do you know he's a mistake? Oops, sorry, you don't need facts do you?
Houdini Logic Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Another mistake, boy these thai guys are certainly paying to learn by throwing money at it... More money than brains... Roll on the end of a fvckin bad season................. Yep, because that's how you found a company currently employing 3,000 people. Clown.
acooling08 Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 WEALE Naughton Bamba Vitor Bruma Abe Gally Wellens King Yakubu Kamara
davieG Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 We played 4-4-2 under Pearson for most of last year, I can't see why we can't now. With Oakley playing narrow, so virtually 3 central midfielders and one wide man. Perming any two from Abe, King and Wellens doesn't provide us with a strong enough central midfield pair that's why both Pearson and Sven have played a 3rd man there either Abe or Oakley.
acooling08 Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Lets be honest though, our 'wide men' don't play like wingers.. as in running past defenders to the byline and getting a cross in. Dyer can beat a man but can't produce a cross/shot, Vassell can beat a man but then stops, Gally isn't quick but can cross.
Kenners Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Another mistake, boy these thai guys are certainly paying to learn by throwing money at it... More money than brains... Roll on the end of a fvckin bad season................. Nod.E, GO.
SMX11 Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 With Oakley playing narrow, so virtually 3 central midfielders and one wide man. Perming any two from Abe, King and Wellens doesn't provide us with a strong enough central midfield pair that's why both Pearson and Sven have played a 3rd man there either Abe or Oakley. Maybe do the same with Abe then, unless you go Gallagher right and Dyer left
skinnydipper Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 When he was at WBA I used to think of him as a poor mans Thierry Henry - which isn't necessarily a bad thing.
wolfgang amadeus Posted 22 March 2011 Posted 22 March 2011 Was pretty average at Celtic last season from what I saw of him. Hope he does well.
muzzy1981 Posted 23 March 2011 Posted 23 March 2011 With Oakley playing narrow, so virtually 3 central midfielders and one wide man. Perming any two from Abe, King and Wellens doesn't provide us with a strong enough central midfield pair that's why both Pearson and Sven have played a 3rd man there either Abe or Oakley. Yeh but to be fair we played really well 442 against QPR recently.
davieG Posted 23 March 2011 Posted 23 March 2011 Maybe do the same with Abe then, unless you go Gallagher right and Dyer left With Abe in it's virtually what we already play with 3 central midfielders and one winger that doesn't provide us with and attacking 442 With Gallagher right and Dyer left the central midfield of two from Abe, King and Wellens would be strong enough, Pearson sussed that out and that's why he played Oakley in a narrow wing position Yeh but to be fair we played really well 442 against QPR recently. Again with Oakley playing narrow. If you have a midfield that includes 4 central midfielders in Abe, Oakley, King and Wellens it's not really a 442, certainly not an attacking one, if you do it with 3 central midfielders and one winger it ends up being a 433 or a 451.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.