JamesO Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 Yes, and heterosexual couples should be able to have a civil service. I also think that same sex couples should be able to adopt and raise children, by that I mean be assessed for suitability on the same criteria as heterosexual couples. You can add join the army, give blood, vote and drive to that list. NO NO NO. Realistically a child needs both a mother and father figure around them. Not two mums or two dads.
Captain... Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 Either way gays, you will get what you want eventually! Over the years to come it will happen for certain as society becomes more liberal, and backward thinking right wing cvnts like myself die out. That is of course assuming that the country doesn't become majority muslim, then you're all dead, literally! You won't die out, you are like cockroaches, even after the inevitable nuclear holocaust there will be tories,
acooling08 Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 On the subject of gays, David Starkey was on Question Time yesterday and he speaks a hell of a lot of sense! Going back to my previous post, when Islam becomes the majority religion of the country in a few hundred years, what will happen to all the homosexuals??
S_Calow Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 A family realistically needs a mother and father, the awkward moment when a child says they have 2 dads or vice versa ... im not being horrible they will get bullied ?
Daggers Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 Some people love to show off their ignorance. It's like a badge of honour that relatively intelligent, reasoned human beings could never, ever achieve. It was a bloody wedding, they did get married. I'm not going to stop.
Guest Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 NO NO NO. Realistically a child needs both a mother and father figure around them. Not two mums or two dads. A family realistically needs a mother and father, the awkward moment when a child says they have 2 dads or vice versa ... im not being horrible they will get bullied ? Because heterosexual couples can always provide a stable, loving family environment? Because no child with a "normal" mum and dad grows up with "issues"?
Guest Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 It was a bloody wedding, they did get married. I'm not going to stop. I'm going to type this really slowly... it... was... a... civil... partnership... ceremony... We all know it's not desirable to have these gay types getting hitched.
Daggers Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 Haven't got time to read, and anyway I tend to have difficulty understanding long words and stuff. I do have time to display my bigotry in the public domain though because my bedtime isn't for like hours yet and I'm allowed to stay up late on Fridays. Oh, and does someone have a key or something? I appear to be trapped in a cupboard. One day the truth will set you free
Captain... Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 NO NO NO. Realistically a child needs both a mother and father figure around them. Not two mums or two dads. I see you are actually reading the thread good start, I would change your realistically to ideally, realistically a child doesn't need either, but they don't normally turn out that well adjusted if they don't. Ideally all children will be raised in safe environments by a loving family and have many strong maternal, paternal and fraternal figures in their lives, they should also be raised to be tolerant and accepting of society and understand right from wrong. In an ideal world children should get all of this from their biological family, but this is not an ideal world and there are plenty of examples of unfit heterosexual couples neglecting their children. Any children adopted by any couple gay or straight, will do so safe in the knowledge that all checks have been put in place to ensure that this couple can provide everything that a child needs, and I don't know if this is the case, but I would expect adoption agencies considering letting a male gay couple adopt would check that there will be a strong female influence on the child, whether it is doting grandmothers or fun Aunts or even a strict female nanny, it is not as simple or clear cut as 2 dads is not as good as a mother and father.
Finnegan Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 I'm loving that Leesoh is getting too much time on her hands again. She loves a good internet fight.
Daggers Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 I'm going to type this really slowly... it... was... a... wedding Ha haaaaa! Gotcha.
Guest Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 I'm loving that Leesoh is getting too much time on her hands again. She loves a good internet fight. I'm just warming up... Ha haaaaa! Gotcha. Editing quotes is neither big, nor clever.
Daggers Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 I'm loving that Leesoh is getting too much time on her hands again. She loves a good internet fight. Pfft. And? Anyone else made a welcome return recently? Any other name spring to mind? Honestly, I don't know why I bother. Honestly - I've no idea why I bother. Editing quotes is big and clever. I knows it
Captain... Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 On the subject of gays, Richard Starkey was on Question Time yesterday and he speaks a hell of a lot of sense! Going back to my previous post, when Islam becomes the majority religion of the country in a few hundred years, what will happen to all the homosexuals?? Richard Starkey is Ringo Starr, and he wasn't on QT last night, I think you mean David. I hate to agree with David Starkey, but he did have some good points to make, (you do know he is gay?) but he is an absolute tw@ and has a checkered past of associating with holocaust deniers and coming out with some borderline racist views that he always manages to get away with because he is a very intelligent and calculating man, and loves the publicity of his controversial comments.
Daggers Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 Don't take this the wrong way but are you a 'batty'? Invite me over to your mum's house to watch football and we can find out why you have such a problem with women together.
JamesO Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 Invite me over to your mum's house to watch football and we can find out why you have such a problem with women together. Mummy doesn't allow me to bring strangers in the house. Only she has this authority,
Captain... Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 Don't take this the wrong way but are you a 'batty'? I am Nora Batty, Why? you fancy a shag?
Guest Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 If it's any consolation, Daggers, I didn't think anyone had missed me.
acooling08 Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 Richard Starkey is Ringo Starr, and he wasn't on QT last night, I think you mean David. I hate to agree with David Starkey, but he did have some good points to make, (you do know he is gay?) but he is an absolute tw@ and has a checkered past of associating with holocaust deniers and coming out with some borderline racist views that he always manages to get away with because he is a very intelligent and calculating man, and loves the publicity of his controversial comments. Yes I meant David, and I knew he was gay, I was demonstrating how him being gay doesn't affect my positive judgement of him at all The way I see it, a homosexual couple having a child is against nature, it is not 'right' or 'normal'. Homesexuality itself IS NORMAL behaviour for a minority of animals (inc. humans) in any species. Most populations of creatures on this planet have homosexual or bisexual examples. However, in every other species except humans they cannot have young for obvious reasons. So in humans, is it right to place children with couples that should biologically NOT have children? I do not think it should be permitted. By all means, if there are no straight couples available to adopt a child that needs a family then maybe, but it should be a last resort. There is evidence to suggest that children need a mother and a father. Not 2 mothers, not 2 fathers. Why risk physchologically damaging a child?
Daggers Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 Yes I meant David, and I knew he was gay, I was demonstrating how him being gay doesn't affect my positive judgement of him at all The way I see it, a homosexual couple having a child is against nature, it is not 'right' or 'normal'. Homesexuality itself IS NORMAL behaviour for a minority of animals (inc. humans) in any species. Most populations of creatures on this planet have homosexual or bisexual examples. However, in every other species except humans they cannot have young for obvious reasons. So in humans, is it right to place children with couples that should biologically NOT have children? I do not think it should be permitted. By all means, if there are no straight couples available to adopt a child that needs a family then maybe, but it should be a last resort. There is evidence to suggest that children need a mother and a father. Not 2 mothers, not 2 fathers. Why risk physchologically damaging a child? A stunning grasp of biology and sociology along with an indication of some great understanding of psychology. Aside from all of the factual errors of course but we can skip over them because it was you posting and we have a very low level of expectation.
Guest Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 There is evidence to suggest that children need a mother and a father. Not 2 mothers, not 2 fathers. Why risk physchologically damaging a child? I have 4 nieces, and 1 nephew. The child with the same-sex parents is going to grow up one of the most well-adjusted, well-balanced of the lot of them, if I'm going to be brutally honest. She's going to have plenty of male role models to learn from, and she benefits from not having a father figure who is a maladjusted dickhead.
acooling08 Posted 2 March 2012 Posted 2 March 2012 A stunning grasp of biology and sociology along with an indication of some great understanding of psychology. Aside from all of the factual errors of course but we can skip over them because it was you posting and we have a very low level of expectation. It's funny how you never offer your own opinions, just rudely dismiss everyone else's.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.