Same-sex marriage

[Guest Bilo]

I was going to make an anal sex joke on this thread, butt fvck it. I can't be arsed.

[I am Rod Hull]

I was going to make an anal sex joke on this thread, butt fvck it. I can't be arsed.

Stop being so anal and do it..

[FuriousFox46]

You really are bumming this thread mate....

Well I did start it...

I was going to make an anal sex joke on this thread, butt fvck it. I can't be arsed.

I was going to make a gay jole, butt fvck it.

[Webbo]

Stop being so anal and do it..

I think that would be a cock up.

[Guest]

The ceremony is two people pledging their love, and a caring trust for the future.

Are you saying that homosexual couples aren't capable of that?

Where do bisexuals fit in all this?

[I am Rod Hull]

Are you saying that homosexual couples aren't capable of that?

Where do bisexuals fit in all this?

Bum and fanny....

You really should do more research on the subject...

[FuriousFox46]

Are you saying that homosexual couples aren't capable of that?

Where do bisexuals fit in all this?

Surely you can't have a bisexual wedding?

[Captain...]

Surely you can't have a bisexual wedding?

Why not, a three way wedding, a bi-sexual their female partner and their male partner, makes perfect sense to me. Or are you one of those that don't believe in besexuality.

You could also have an asexual wedding, but that would just be one person at the altar.

I am being silly of course, It is almost as if sexuality should have nothing to do with 2 people dedicating their lives to each other.

[Zingari]

Is polygamy, polyandry or any other polly wolly doodle wrong morally ?

(apart from having multiple mother in laws that is )

edit ;

should that be mothers in law ?

[Captain...]

Is polygamy, polyandry or any other polly wolly doodle wrong morally ?

(apart from having multiple mother in laws that is )

Polygamy is legal in many countries and I don't think it is morally wrong if it is done in an open and up-front way, I got a lot of love why not spread it around, I think it is only illegal in the UK because of the paperwork. Going back to our natural instincts monogamy is not natural, evolution occured through the strongest spreading their seed to as many mates as possible while the weakest were left out in the cold trying figure out how to masterbate with paws and dreaming of opposable thumbs.

[I am Rod Hull]

Is polygamy, polyandry or any other polly wolly doodle wrong morally ?

(apart from having multiple mother in laws that is )

edit ;

should that be mothers in law ?

Two lesbians adopt a girl

You marry the girl

You get 2 mothers in law

That`s more than enough reason not to let them adopt. (unless one of them is really butch, wears a black blazer, likes beer, smells her own farts and knows the off side rule)

[Zingari]

Polygamy is legal in many countries and I don't think it is morally wrong if it is done in an open and up-front way, I got a lot of love why not spread it around, I think it is only illegal in the UK because of the paperwork. Going back to our natural instincts monogamy is not natural, evolution occured through the strongest spreading their seed to as many mates as possible while the weakest were left out in the cold trying figure out how to masterbate with paws and dreaming of opposable thumbs.

I've heard bureaucracy blamed for many things before but not that

[Zingari]

Two lesbians adopt a girl

You marry the girl

You get 2 mothers in law

That`s more than enough reason not to let them adopt. (unless one of them is really butch, wears a black blazer, likes beer, smells her own farts and knows the off side rule)

Yes but these mothers in law won't be two "Hyacinth Bouquet" types that never think you're good enough will they ?

So they don't count

edit;

and what is the offside rule ?

[Zingari]

If polygamous and polyandrous unions are ok, would it be possible for groups of gay men or women to enter into poly( whatever the word is) marriages ?

[Captain...]

If polygamous and polyandrous unions are ok, would it be possible for groups of gay men or women to enter into poly( whatever the word is) marriages ?

In my world it is actively encouraged, why must we limit ourselves to loving just one person.

[Guest]

Relationships are complicated enough when you have one partner. Adding more to the equation makes things intolerable.

Plus, think of all the birthdays, and as for Christmas? Forget it.

[I am Rod Hull]

Yes but these mothers in law won't be two "Hyacinth Bouquet" types that never think you're good enough will they ? So they don't count edit; and what is the offside rule ?

Offside is something my Mrs shouts out when I try to practice gayism on her

[NeilyBoy]

27 no votes? Really? I'd like to see the age bracket of those voters...

[I am Rod Hull]

27 no votes? Really? I'd like to see the age bracket of those voters...

40+

We They were brain washed by good church going righteous folk and not the gay heavy TV and media.

[flowwolf]

People that voted no care to give reasons why?

No.

[NeilyBoy]

Sounds about right xD. My mum's in her late 40's and only the other week I had to ask her to stop referring to black people as "coloured". At least she wasn't using it in a deliberately derogatory way (and since then has been avoiding the term) but it shows how out of touch people in that age range can be. If someone's black, they're black - I get that a lot of people who say 'coloured' think they're being pc, but a few seconds of logical thought and you realise the horror of inventing a pc term for black (or ethnic) yet having no problem acknowledging whiteness, as though being ethnic, or saying that somebody is, is somehow inherently un-pc.

Back to the gays and tbh it's not surprising the 27 who voted no can't give reasons why because I've sat here trying but I can't think of any reasons somebody might logically give. But obviously they are too proud to accept their blatant bigotry.

[FuriousFox46]

Why not, a three way wedding, a bi-sexual their female partner and their male partner, makes perfect sense to me. Or are you one of those that don't believe in besexuality.

You could also have an asexual wedding, but that would just be one person at the altar.

I am being silly of course, It is almost as if sexuality should have nothing to do with 2 people dedicating their lives to each other.

I think everyone's 'bisexual'.

I don't think anyone is 100% hetero or homosexual. Although, most people are invariably close to either.

There's a ranking for this;

0 Exclusively heterosexual

1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual

2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual

3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual

4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual

5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual

6 Exclusively homosexual

X Non-sexual

[I am Rod Hull]

Sounds about right xD. My mum's in her late 40's and only the other week I had to ask her to stop referring to black people as "coloured". At least she wasn't using it in a deliberately derogatory way (and since then has been avoiding the term) but it shows how out of touch people in that age range can be. If someone's black, they're black - I get that a lot of people who say 'coloured' think they're being pc, but a few seconds of logical thought and you realise the horror of inventing a pc term for black (or ethnic) yet having no problem acknowledging whiteness, as though being ethnic, or saying that somebody is, is somehow inherently un-pc.

Back to the gays and tbh it's not surprising the 27 who voted no can't give reasons why because I've sat here trying but I can't think of any reasons somebody might logically give. But obviously they are too proud to accept their blatant bigotry.

Yes, I cant give any reason not to justify unnatural sexual deviance.

[Phube]

Yes, I cant give any reason not to justify unnatural sexual deviance.

"unnatural" according to whom?

[FuriousFox46]

Yes, I cant give any reason not to justify unnatural sexual deviance.

Homosexuality is common in over 450 species. Homophobia is found in just one.

Shove that up your arse, bigot. (Pun intended)