Daggers Posted 3 March 2012 Posted 3 March 2012 I wasn't referring to you're post per say, which is why i didnt quote it I just meant the whole Adam and Eve argument as a whole. And yes i have heard of Alan partridge and i do find him rather funny no offense was intended Didn't offend me - just didn't want to be lumped in with all the God-bothering, homophobic mentalists
Phube Posted 3 March 2012 Posted 3 March 2012 Didn't offend me - just didn't want to be lumped in with all the God-bothering, homophobic mentalists That's what I think when I think of you Daggers...
FuriousFox46 Posted 3 March 2012 Author Posted 3 March 2012 So bored of the 'God created Adam and Eve argument. God created everyone in his own image? So god created gay's... so shove that up you're arse, who knows.. you might like it and convert. I find it hard to like religion.
Rincewind Posted 3 March 2012 Posted 3 March 2012 Adam poor man! Punished for nothing. - Elie Wiesel. A converted cannibal is one who, on Friday only eats fishermen - Emily Lotney I'm a practicing heterosexual but bisexuality immediately doubles your chances of a date on a Saturday night. - Woody Allen. Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet - Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) We must be greater than God, for we have to undo His injustice. - Jules Renard The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic, is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. - George Bernard Shaw.
Phube Posted 3 March 2012 Posted 3 March 2012 After watching Daddy Day Care (on C4), I no longer think that gay couple should have a child... He was shocking!
FuriousFox46 Posted 3 March 2012 Author Posted 3 March 2012 After watching Daddy Day Care (on C4), I no longer think that gay couple should have a child... He was shocking! Ohhh! Gay!
Phube Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Those ever-so responsible (and in no way connected to any paedophilia) Catholic Cardinals are at it again... BBC Catholic cardinal criticises gay marriages plan Cardinal Keith O'Brien has a reputation as a robust defender of traditionalist Christian teaching Continue reading the main story Related Stories Sentamu attacks same-sex marriage Gay marriage 'improves health' Kirk against gay marriage change The government's plans for gay marriage have been criticised by the most senior Roman Catholic cleric in Britain. Cardinal Keith O'Brien, the leader of the Catholic Church in Scotland, said the plans were a "grotesque subversion of a universally accepted human right". He said the idea of redefining marriage, which David Cameron has said he supports, would "shame the United Kingdom in the eyes of the world". He said it was wrong to deliberately deprive a child of a mother or father. Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, Cardinal O'Brien said: "Same-sex marriage would eliminate entirely in law the basic idea of a mother and a father for every child. It would create a society which deliberately chooses to deprive a child of either a mother or a father." Cardinal O'Brien has become the latest of several senior clergy to denounce what he calls the "madness" of the government's backing for marriage to include homosexual couples. He accuses ministers of attempting to "redefine reality", and "dismantle the universally understood meaning of marriage". He claimed the change was "at the behest of a small minority of activists". In January the Anglican Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, also insisted governments did not have the moral authority to redefine marriage. Mr Cameron publicly supported gay marriage at last year's Conservative Party conference, and the Home Office said last week the government believed a loving and committed couple should "have the option of a civil marriage irrespective of their sexual orientation". Equalities minister Lynne Featherstone is to launch a consultation on the plans later this month. The Scottish government has already begun a consultation process north of the border and has received more than 50,000 responses. Many church leaders believe gay marriage would represent a further significant step in marginalising traditional religious values in society. Earlier this week Conservative MP Peter Bone called the gay marriage plan "completely nuts".
Zingari Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 i don't know about "same sex" marriage , but i'd like to be in a "some sex" marriage
NeilyBoy Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 "grotesque subversion of a universally accepted human right". So these 'gays' are some form of mutation? I for one welcome Fagneto and his brotherhood of evil poop-shootants. You Catholics can be slaughtered all you like.
Guest Bilo Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 If this isn't America's answer to Cholmondley-Warner, something is very wrong.
Captain... Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Those ever-so responsible (and in no way connected to any paedophilia) Catholic Cardinals are at it again... He accuses ministers of attempting to "redefine reality", That is the pot calling the kettle black. If this isn't America's answer to Cholmondley-Warner, something is very wrong. Did anyone else get an advert for Gay Adoption on that?
Phube Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 If this isn't America's answer to Cholmondley-Warner, something is very wrong. If that is real it's hilariously worrying!!
FuriousFox46 Posted 4 March 2012 Author Posted 4 March 2012 If this isn't America's answer to Cholmondley-Warner, something is very wrong. That's a genuine video from years ago.
Steven Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Those ever-so responsible (and in no way connected to any paedophilia) Catholic Cardinals are at it again... Many church leaders believe gay marriage would represent a further significant step in marginalising traditional religious values in society. What like the rape of young boys and girls and cover it up? Incredulous is the word when the Catholic Church makes any claims to moral authority.
Guest Bilo Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 American TV in the 1950s/1960s was unintentionally brilliant!
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 No problems with homo sexuals, but I draw the line at marriage. Bloody ridiculous. What is the world coming to?
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Isn't marriage itself an out dated concept, why does a partnership need to be made official with a piece of paper by a government department/church for it to have meaning and longevity? Can't agree with you here. Why do people just call it a piece of paper. The ceremony is two people pledging their love, and a caring trust for the future. I must say, however, that many people do marry, and soon part, so in that sense it becomes hollow. I think in all marriages that last, every person would not rue the day they got married. No, it is not "just a piece of paper"
davieG Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Can't agree with you here. Why do people just call it a piece of paper. The ceremony is two people pledging their love, and a caring trust for the future. I must say, however, that many people do marry, and soon part, so in that sense it becomes hollow. I think in all marriages that last, every person would not rue the day they got married. No, it is not "just a piece of paper" You don't need government or religious approval for that.
Zingari Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Can't agree with you here. Why do people just call it a piece of paper. The ceremony is two people pledging their love, and a caring trust for the future. I must say, however, that many people do marry, and soon part, so in that sense it becomes hollow. I think in all marriages that last, every person would not rue the day they got married. No, it is not "just a piece of paper" i thought you were the kinda guy that liked to play the field a bit with the ladies DT if so, your post might sound a little bit hypocritical
Rincewind Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Birds just display a few feathers and some animals may do a little dance (males) then its hey ho, and with no reception it's honeymoon bliss and down to the nuptials. I suppose the fact that animals cannot write may also be a factor.
Daggers Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 No problems with homo sexuals, but I draw the line at marriage. You sound like the kind of guy who would be best off not marrying a homosexual then.
FuriousFox46 Posted 4 March 2012 Author Posted 4 March 2012 No problems with homo sexuals, but I draw the line at marriage. Bloody ridiculous. What is the world coming to? You quite clearly have a problem then...
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 You quite clearly have a problem then... You really are bumming this thread mate....
purpleronnie Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 No problems with homo sexuals, but I draw the line at marriage. Bloody ridiculous. What is the world coming to? Becoming more equal?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.