Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
FuriousFox46

Same-sex marriage

  

182 members have voted

  1. 1. Should same-sex couples be allowed to marry?

    • Yes
      129
    • No
      43
    • Don't know
      10


Recommended Posts

Posted

I wasn't referring to you're post per say, which is why i didnt quote it :thumbup:

I just meant the whole Adam and Eve argument as a whole. And yes i have heard of Alan partridge and i do find him rather funny ;)

no offense was intended :)

Didn't offend me - just didn't want to be lumped in with all the God-bothering, homophobic mentalists :D

Posted

Didn't offend me - just didn't want to be lumped in with all the God-bothering, homophobic mentalists :D

That's what I think when I think of you Daggers... :unsure:

Posted

So bored of the 'God created Adam and Eve argument.

God created everyone in his own image? So god created gay's... so shove that up you're arse, who knows.. you might like it and convert. :thumbup:

I find it hard to like religion.

Posted

Adam poor man! Punished for nothing. - Elie Wiesel.

A converted cannibal is one who, on Friday only eats fishermen - Emily Lotney

I'm a practicing heterosexual but bisexuality immediately doubles your chances of a date on a Saturday night. - Woody Allen.

Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet - Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821)

We must be greater than God, for we have to undo His injustice. - Jules Renard

The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic, is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. - George Bernard Shaw.

Posted

After watching Daddy Day Care (on C4), I no longer think that gay couple should have a child... He was shocking!

Posted

Those ever-so responsible (and in no way connected to any paedophilia) Catholic Cardinals are at it again... :rolleyes:

BBC

Catholic cardinal criticises gay marriages plan

_52322334_011808327-1.jpg

Cardinal Keith O'Brien has a reputation as a robust defender of traditionalist Christian teaching

Continue reading the main story

Related Stories

The government's plans for gay marriage have been criticised by the most senior Roman Catholic cleric in Britain.

Cardinal Keith O'Brien, the leader of the Catholic Church in Scotland, said the plans were a "grotesque subversion of a universally accepted human right".

He said the idea of redefining marriage, which David Cameron has said he supports, would "shame the United Kingdom in the eyes of the world".

He said it was wrong to deliberately deprive a child of a mother or father.

Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, Cardinal O'Brien said: "Same-sex marriage would eliminate entirely in law the basic idea of a mother and a father for every child. It would create a society which deliberately chooses to deprive a child of either a mother or a father."

Cardinal O'Brien has become the latest of several senior clergy to denounce what he calls the "madness" of the government's backing for marriage to include homosexual couples.

He accuses ministers of attempting to "redefine reality", and "dismantle the universally understood meaning of marriage".

He claimed the change was "at the behest of a small minority of activists".

In January the Anglican Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, also insisted governments did not have the moral authority to redefine marriage.

Mr Cameron publicly supported gay marriage at last year's Conservative Party conference, and the Home Office said last week the government believed a loving and committed couple should "have the option of a civil marriage irrespective of their sexual orientation".

Equalities minister Lynne Featherstone is to launch a consultation on the plans later this month.

The Scottish government has already begun a consultation process north of the border and has received more than 50,000 responses.

Many church leaders believe gay marriage would represent a further significant step in marginalising traditional religious values in society.

Earlier this week Conservative MP Peter Bone called the gay marriage plan "completely nuts".

Posted

"grotesque subversion of a universally accepted human right".

So these 'gays' are some form of mutation? I for one welcome Fagneto and his brotherhood of evil poop-shootants. You Catholics can be slaughtered all you like.

Guest Bilo
Posted

If this isn't America's answer to Cholmondley-Warner, something is very wrong. lol

Posted

Those ever-so responsible (and in no way connected to any paedophilia) Catholic Cardinals are at it again... :rolleyes:

He accuses ministers of attempting to "redefine reality",

That is the pot calling the kettle black.

If this isn't America's answer to Cholmondley-Warner, something is very wrong. lol

Did anyone else get an advert for Gay Adoption on that?

Posted

If this isn't America's answer to Cholmondley-Warner, something is very wrong. lol

If that is real it's hilariously worrying!! lol:S

Posted

Those ever-so responsible (and in no way connected to any paedophilia) Catholic Cardinals are at it again... :rolleyes:

Many church leaders believe gay marriage would represent a further significant step in marginalising traditional religious values in society.

What like the rape of young boys and girls and cover it up? :unsure::glare: Incredulous is the word when the Catholic Church makes any claims to moral authority. :rolleyes:

Guest Bilo
Posted

lol American TV in the 1950s/1960s was unintentionally brilliant!

Posted

Isn't marriage itself an out dated concept, why does a partnership need to be made official with a piece of paper by a government department/church for it to have meaning and longevity?

Can't agree with you here. Why do people just call it a piece of paper. The ceremony is two people pledging their love, and a caring trust for the future.

I must say, however, that many people do marry, and soon part, so in that sense it becomes hollow. I think in all marriages that last, every person would not rue the day they got married.

No, it is not "just a piece of paper"

Posted

Can't agree with you here. Why do people just call it a piece of paper. The ceremony is two people pledging their love, and a caring trust for the future.

I must say, however, that many people do marry, and soon part, so in that sense it becomes hollow. I think in all marriages that last, every person would not rue the day they got married.

No, it is not "just a piece of paper"

You don't need government or religious approval for that.

Posted

Can't agree with you here. Why do people just call it a piece of paper. The ceremony is two people pledging their love, and a caring trust for the future.

I must say, however, that many people do marry, and soon part, so in that sense it becomes hollow. I think in all marriages that last, every person would not rue the day they got married.

No, it is not "just a piece of paper"

i thought you were the kinda guy that liked to play the field a bit with the ladies DT

if so, your post might sound a little bit hypocritical

Posted

Birds just display a few feathers and some animals may do a little dance (males) then its hey ho, and with no reception it's honeymoon bliss and down to the nuptials. I suppose the fact that animals cannot write may also be a factor.

Posted

No problems with homo sexuals, but I draw the line at marriage.

You sound like the kind of guy who would be best off not marrying a homosexual then.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...