I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 "unnatural" according to whom? Mother nature...
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Homosexuality is common in over 450 species. Homophobia is found in just one. Shove that up your arse, bigot. (Pun intended) Who wrote that? Elton John? Nice pun btw You show bigotry towards someone who doesn`t believe in homosexuality... You are no better than me
Captain... Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 I think everyone's 'bisexual'. I don't think anyone is 100% hetero or homosexual. Although, most people are invariably close to either. There's a ranking for this; 0 Exclusively heterosexual 1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual 2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual 3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual 4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual 5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual 6 Exclusively homosexual X Non-sexual Yeah that is the Kinsey scale, the film Kinsey is worth watching, it goes into it in a lot more detail, as well as how afraid we are of accepting our sexual nature and displaying anything that goes against the accepted norm. Not to mention how others are scared of people deviating from what we have had indoctrinated into us as the norm.
Captain... Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Mother nature... You will find a much longer post in here from me about this, in summary there is nothing natural about monogomous heterosexual relationships and marriage, you look at nature and you see animals fvcking their brothers and sisters and their children, that is nature. What you mean by "Mother nature" is what we are conditioned to believe as the norm by the society we live in, you find a girl, you settle down, you get married and have kids and spend the rest of your days trying to suppress your natural urges, anyone who doesn't follow this is a sexual deviant. You say gay marriage is against Mother Nature, and you are right, but so is straight marriage.
Daggers Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9121354/Catholic-leader-Cardinal-Keith-OBrien-clashes-with-David-Cameron-on-same-sex-marriage-plans.html I'm surprised he's not for it seeing as Catholic priests seem to love all of God's children...
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 you spoke to her? I see her and all her beauty You will find a much longer post in here from me about this, in summary there is nothing natural about monogomous heterosexual relationships and marriage, you look at nature and you see animals fvcking their brothers and sisters and their children, that is nature. What you mean by "Mother nature" is what we are conditioned to believe as the norm by the society we live in, you find a girl, you settle down, you get married and have kids and spend the rest of your days trying to suppress your natural urges, anyone who doesn't follow this is a sexual deviant. You say gay marriage is against Mother Nature, and you are right, but so is straight marriage. Unnatural I think you`ll find.... Male + Female = offspring Male + Male/Female + Female = death of a species A few dodgy DNA strands doesn`t make it right.....
Phube Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 I see her and all her beauty Unnatural I think you`ll find.... Male + Female = offspring Male + Male/Female + Female = death of a species A few dodgy DNA stands doesn`t make it right..... So you're saying the only possible reason for sex is procreation? Okay! I'm glad you've never unnaturally masturbated or used a condom?
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 So you're saying the only possible reason for sex is procreation? Okay! I'm glad you've never unnaturally masturbated or used a condom? I also unnaturally shave my face and change light bulbs....
Captain... Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 I see her and all her beauty Unnatural I think you`ll find.... Male + Female = offspring Male + Male/Female + Female = death of a species A few dodgy DNA strands doesn`t make it right..... The natural urges I was referring to are the ones to procreate with and fvck as many different mates as possible which is our nature and we suppress it by comitting to long term monogomous relationships. Like I said it was a summary of a more detailed post I made earlier, apologies if it wasn't clear.
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 The natural urges I was referring to are the ones to procreate with and fvck as many different mates as possible which is our nature and we suppress it by comitting to long term monogomous relationships. Like I said it was a summary of a more detailed post I made earlier, apologies if it wasn't clear. So that`s Bisexuals then and not monogays?
FuriousFox46 Posted 4 March 2012 Author Posted 4 March 2012 Who wrote that? Elton John? Nice pun btw You show bigotry towards someone who doesn`t believe in homosexuality... You are no better than me Now, I do not. You think the sanctity of a dual-sex union is greater than that of a same-sex one. I don't believe, I'm better than you. I believe I am your equal and should be treated that way in the eyes of the law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals I sincerely doubt if you read Page 6 of this thread, you will find a strong enough argument to oppose gay marriage.
FuriousFox46 Posted 4 March 2012 Author Posted 4 March 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSTv7Xao93I&feature=player_embedded#! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFkeKKszXTw&feature=player_embedded
Captain... Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 So that`s Bisexuals then and not monogays? What on earth are you on about? You brought mother nature into it, I was saying that argument is completely defunct as we are dictated to by society not by our natural urges. There are no animals in nature that mate exclusively with only one partner, except the seahorse, our natural urges are to exert our dominance and fvck as many of the opposite sex as possible spread our seed far and wide. We have been conditioned against such behaviour and almost forced to live in long term monogomous relationships by society, this is not natural. By that reasoning you are right homosexual marriages and exclusive homosexual relationships are not natural, but then the same is true for heterosexual marriages. Now the argument that in nature there has been documented cases of homosexuality in over 1500 species of animals, is also flawed as there is very little evidence of exclusively homosexual behaviour in animals and so should really be classed as bisexuality. I guess the point is it has nothing to do with mother nature, it is your own closed mind and bigotry that makes you disapprove of homosexuality.
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Now, I do not. You think the sanctity of a dual-sex union is greater than that of a same-sex one. I don't believe, I'm better than you. I believe I am your equal and should be treated that way in the eyes of the law. http://en.wikipedia....vior_in_animals I sincerely doubt if you read Page 6 of this thread, you will find a strong enough argument to oppose gay marriage. You keep going on about page 6 like some kind of 19th century lay preacher quoting a message from the psalms
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 What on earth are you on about? You brought mother nature into it, I was saying that argument is completely defunct as we are dictated to by society not by our natural urges. There are no animals in nature that mate exclusively with only one partner, except the seahorse, our natural urges are to exert our dominance and fvck as many of the opposite sex as possible spread our seed far and wide. We have been conditioned against such behaviour and almost forced to live in long term monogomous relationships by society, this is not natural. By that reasoning you are right homosexual marriages and exclusive homosexual relationships are not natural, but then the same is true for heterosexual marriages. Now the argument that in nature there has been documented cases of homosexuality in over 1500 species of animals, is also flawed as there is very little evidence of exclusively homosexual behaviour in animals and so should really be classed as bisexuality. I guess the point is it has nothing to do with mother nature, it is your own closed mind and bigotry that makes you disapprove of homosexuality. Gay propaganda, nothing more.... WAKEY WAKEY....
FuriousFox46 Posted 4 March 2012 Author Posted 4 March 2012 You keep going on about page 6 like some kind of 19th century lay preacher quoting a message from the psalms Nah, spouting ill-advised bullshit, is more your forté
FuriousFox46 Posted 4 March 2012 Author Posted 4 March 2012 Gay propaganda, nothing more.... WAKEY WAKEY.... Being white and having blue eyes is also a mutation. The Bible is straight propaganda You can either be an idiot, a close-minded bigot or a closeted homosexual. Because, you have yet to provide a concrete argument against same-sex marriage.
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Nah, spouting ill-advised bullshit, is more your forté Why am I wrong? why are you right? And please stop abusing me, I don`t like it...
FuriousFox46 Posted 4 March 2012 Author Posted 4 March 2012 Why am I wrong? why are you right? And please stop abusing me, I don`t like it... Because you're denying two people the right to a marriage because you don't agree with their sexual preference. It is simply spiteful. You claim being gay is unnatural. When people are born gay and correcting my earlier argument over 1,500 species engage in homosexual activity. You say it's down to mutated DNA. Which is the same way we got white people and blue-eyed people. Do you want to take away their rights? Sorry, if I come across as touchy. But, I don't see any reason why you should deny me the right to marry who I want just because you disagree.
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Because you're denying two people the right to a marriage because you don't agree with their sexual preference. It is simply spiteful. You claim being gay is unnatural. When people are born gay and correcting my earlier argument over 1,500 species engage in homosexual activity. You say it's down to mutated DNA. Which is the same way we got white people and blue-eyed people. Do you want to take away their rights? Sorry, if I come across as touchy. But, I don't see any reason why you should deny me the right to marry who I want just because you disagree. Who made that up found that out? stop believing top heavy gay propaganda... All they are trying to do is justify their life style....
Gold Coast Fox Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 Who made that up found that out? stop believing top heavy gay propaganda... All they are trying to do is justify their life style.... I actually thought you were one of the better poster on this forum up until now. I shouldn't have to justify my life style to you or anyone else. And as for my 'mutated DNA' at least i have kept the ability to accept people for who they are and let them get on with there lives without trying to deny them something they are entitled to.
I am Rod Hull Posted 4 March 2012 Posted 4 March 2012 I actually thought you were one of the better poster on this forum up until now. I don't have to justify my life style to you or anyone else. And as for my 'mutated DNA' at least i have kept the ability to accept people for who they are and let them get on with there lives without trying to deny them something they are entitled to. Listen.... I used to work with a lesbian who had 5 kids before she realised she should be batting for the other side, she was one of the funniest people i`v ever met and nights out with her and her partner were fookin great. They were married a few years back and I can`t fault them for doing it.... Also worked with a gay lad who used to give me a neck massage at my desk and tell me filthy stories about him and his partner, top bloke.... I go with the flow and hold no prejudice towards gay people but I have my views and i respect yours....
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.