The Year Of The Fox Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2216782/Nigel-Pearson-deserves-Leicester-target-Premier-League.html
Leicfox Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 This is slowly becoming a smear Leicester City campaign by The Mail. Is this Neil Moxley a Forest or Cov fan ?
Jace Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 This is slowly becoming a smear Leicester City campaign by The Mail. Is this Neil Moxley a Forest or Cov fan ? Cov I think?
The Year Of The Fox Posted 12 October 2012 Author Posted 12 October 2012 Forest judging by his comments on o Driscoll. I tweeted him and Jason Bourne asking. Got a reply off neither
HEGGSY Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 He's following OfficialNFFC and Forests owner on twitter. And they say they don't care
Guest BlueBrett Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 The cheek of them! It was they who started all the rumours in the first place and now they are having a go at the club because in their view they didn't respond appropriately! Ridiculous
The Year Of The Fox Posted 12 October 2012 Author Posted 12 October 2012 Think the reporter deserves some Twitter abuse
Mark_w Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 I'm not reading it, they can go **** themselves.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 He should get his stuff proof read for error - grammatical and factual. Knob.
Danno Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 Looks like a paedo judging by his twitter pic. **** off you forest ****
z-layrex Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 I bet the author can't even satisfy his wife. What a pathetic career he leads.
foxesfan1989 Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 Not like the Mail to criticise foreigners.
whoareyaaa Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 Poor really, re-hashed story which is old news and he has to end it with a book about some forest scumbag. **** off!
dmayne7 Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 The bit at the end where he tried to accuse the board of hypocrisy about commenting on Media speculation; If he had actually read the statement he would realise that they said they wouldn't normally but in this case they felt they had to in order to dispel the rumours. The article just sums up 'journalism'
Stocker Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 Has anybody ever read the mail, its full of apologies for all the lies it printed the day before, they just make stuff up and sell it to morons.
FoxesAreBlue Posted 12 October 2012 Posted 12 October 2012 It seems I managed to rile the "journalist" on twitter... it's @andy_callus (Not sure how to copy it onto here)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.