Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Guest shearfox

Yes pretty bad, calm down ...

Recommended Posts

Guest shearfox
Posted

Still second , we aren't going to win them all... they took the only two chances they had and it wasn't our night. We will bounce back just as we did when losing to Charlton and Doncaster.

Posted

Exactly. The people on here moaning are the ones that only come to games like this and when we're doing well.

 

 

We're second in the league. Lost THREE all season.

Posted

Not good enough by our standards however we always f**k up last game before international breaks positives are other teams around have f**ked up as well QPR and Burnley we are second yes granted but we need to maintain those standards.

 

I have a feeling NP may bring in a winger on loan because we desperately need pace on the right flank something we are missing in De Laet's absence.

Posted

Your right, we lost to forest but they dont care so why should we.

We lost our unbeaten home record, still it had to happen

The way results went we could have gone top

We weren't shit, the ref was and forest got the rub of the green

And some one let that citylee knob back in

Posted

Lost to a negative team that are going nowhere, so what , we just need to carry on playing attacking football bring a couple of players in in the transfer window and we will get automatic promotion. It's the draws that drag you down in this league and consign you to the lottery of the playoff's so keep the faith and we will get there.

Posted

They came to squash our free flowing paced attacks which they managed well enough. If that's how they want to play it then their fans aren't exactly in for a treat this season!

Posted

We just need to make sure we come back after the international break positive and ready to get back to winning ways. Results elsewhere were relatively kind to us today.

If we had made the chances in the first 20mins count, it would've been a very different story.

Posted

I don't think anyone is being negative about the team, we can all see that it was a one off and you are going to have bad results in what is a long hard season.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Don't look at the loss. A loss is a loss.. End of

Look at the MANNER of the loss.. That's more important.

In the second half, we were abject.

I'm afraid I was sat there, listening to the Forest scum singing their hearts out, thinking that we could have played for hours today without scoring.

That's the worrying thing.

And I didn't get the subs? Taking off Lloyd (pace) and Knocky (skill) to bring on Hammond and GTF?

Eh?

Why?

We were 0-2 down?

Strange.

Posted

Don't look at the loss. A loss is a loss.. End of

Look at the MANNER of the loss.. That's more important.

In the second half, we were abject.

I'm afraid I was sat there, listening to the Forest scum singing their hearts out, thinking that we could have played for hours today without scoring.

That's the worrying thing.

And I didn't get the subs? Taking off Lloyd (pace) and Knocky (skill) to bring on Hammond and GTF?

Eh?

Why?

We were 0-2 down?

Strange.

Little other options on bench to change game.Why take knocky off?Is he not our match winner?

Guest Sharpe's Fox
Posted

Don't look at the loss. A loss is a loss.. End of

Look at the MANNER of the loss.. That's more important.

In the second half, we were abject.

I'm afraid I was sat there, listening to the Forest scum singing their hearts out, thinking that we could have played for hours today without scoring.

That's the worrying thing.

And I didn't get the subs? Taking off Lloyd (pace) and Knocky (skill) to bring on Hammond and GTF?

Eh?

Why?

We were 0-2 down?

Strange.

 

I've seen alot of this today, and I generally disagree with it. In the second half the wide play was abysmal (as was the crossing coming from it) and the game was becoming stop-start with the amount of throws. I thought the substitutions allowed us to play through the middle and won us a penalty a few minutes later. My opinion, though, and I can see why people would want Knockaert to stay on.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

I've seen alot of this today, and I generally disagree with it. In the second half the wide play was abysmal (as was the crossing coming from it) and the game was becoming stop-start with the amount of throws. I thought the substitutions allowed us to play through the middle and won us a penalty a few minutes later. My opinion, though, and I can see why people would want Knockaert to stay on.

Rubbish

The penalty wasn't won due to any tactical changes. It was won due to a massively clumsy challenge from their defender.

Talk about clutching at fooking straws. Use your fookin eyes man.

Guest Sharpe's Fox
Posted

Rubbish

The penalty wasn't won due to any tactical changes. It was won due to a massively clumsy challenge from their defender.

Talk about clutching at fooking straws. Use your fookin eyes man.

 

Jesus, I have a go at a balanced post and get slapped down for it. No worries, though.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Jesus, I have a go at a balanced post and get slapped down for it. No worries, though.

We'll talk some sense then.

The penalty was nothing about our formation change was it. It was a daft challenge with a player with his back to the goal. For fooks sake.

Posted

I've seen alot of this today, and I generally disagree with it. In the second half the wide play was abysmal (as was the crossing coming from it) and the game was becoming stop-start with the amount of throws. I thought the substitutions allowed us to play through the middle and won us a penalty a few minutes later. My opinion, though, and I can see why people would want Knockaert to stay on.

I agree we started the 2nd half badly. Which made me wonder what NP had said at half time because we were dominating the first half. But I could understand wanting to try something different. What I couldn't understand is taking off both wingers and effectively killing the game. That's a xanax tactic to hold onto a lead. It's barely believable that he did that when we were losing.

Posted

Tonight is one of the reasons i rarely come on the forum anymore. When we win we are suddenly the best team in the league and we are likened to Barcelona and our players are all brilliant. 7 days later we lose and players need to go and Pearson sacked. There is no happy medium on this forum we are 2nd and playing good football for the most part.

Posted

Tonight is one of the reasons i rarely come on the forum anymore. When we win we are suddenly the best team in the league and we are likened to Barcelona and our players are all brilliant. 7 days later we lose and players need to go and Pearson sacked. There is no happy medium on this forum we are 2nd and playing good football for the most part.

Who said NP should be sacked?

Guest Col city fan
Posted

I agree we started the 2nd half badly. Which made me wonder what NP had said at half time because we were dominating the first half. But I could understand wanting to try something different. What I couldn't understand is taking off both wingers and effectively killing the game. That's a xanax tactic to hold onto a lead. It's barely believable that he did that when we were losing.

It's beyond belief.

Why do you take off your two most dangerous players when you are chasing the game?

Were they injured?

Pearson has done some great things this season but this? I did not get it.

I'd have taken off Nugent today in a flash. He was shit. THAT I'd have understood.

Posted

Who said NP should be sacked?

Are you serious? There has been 1000's over the past 6 to 12 months calling for his head. Troll back thru all the threads on them. We have most unbalanced fans I've ever seen in my life.

Posted

Who said NP should be sacked?

Cuddly(or should that be clueless?) Ken came on post-match bearing the standard for the Pearson Out brigade for one...

Posted

Don't look at the loss. A loss is a loss.. End of

Look at the MANNER of the loss.. That's more important.

In the second half, we were abject.

I'm afraid I was sat there, listening to the Forest scum singing their hearts out, thinking that we could have played for hours today without scoring.

That's the worrying thing.

And I didn't get the subs? Taking off Lloyd (pace) and Knocky (skill) to bring on Hammond and GTF?

Eh?

Why?

We were 0-2 down?

Strange.

I agree with the Knockaert point, thought he was our most dangerous player. Dyer was having little joy though so made sense to take him off. Surprised Nuge got the full 90, he had a shocker. Also thought GTF did well, looks to have a good footballing brain.
Guest Col city fan
Posted

I agree with the Knockaert point, thought he was our most dangerous player. Dyer was having little joy though so made sense to take him off. Surprised Nuge got the full 90, he had a shocker. Also thought GTF did well, looks to have a good footballing brain.

GTF is over the fookin hill buddy...

He will never be the striker we need to bring on to chase a game.

I've nothing against him.. He seems a genuine chap. But relying on him to get back into a game where we are two nil down shows the lack of depth in our squad.

Posted

Cuddly(or should that be clueless?) Ken came on post-match bearing the standard for the Pearson Out brigade for one...

Cuddly Ken is a troll you disabled, if you take anything he says seriously then it's your own fault.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...