Pearsons team vs Svens team

[deanolegend1989]

I loved way=tching him play but it always seemed as if there was an accident waiting.

Of course he now gets unfair stick, he's left which means he was shite, you should know how it works on here.

 

No its not because hes left. I thought it at the time and was delighted he left. He isnt a patch on Moore he was a slow lumbering donkey and couldnt read the game what so ever. Its a crap argument singling out individual games because every player, crap, average, below-average, good, great whatever, will always have stormers here and there..the best players are the most consistent ones.

Whilst I agree maybe Fernandes could of been better, Bamba is the 1 im sure of..I saw him alot of times and he wernt good enough for us.

[Dan]

Says it all really. One side put together by Pearson (after some spending, but largely made whilst clearing up a lot of the previous mess) would quite comfortably thump a side made up of different seasons' worth of players (that was 'built' during our reckless spending era). Mills, Schmeichel, Konchesky and Danns would've never played with Naughton & Yakubu.

 

Here's one - Sven's 10/11 vs Sven's 11/12. Who'd win? I reckon 10/11 and that's what pisses me off the most about him.

[Bryn]

I can't see past the team we put out against Derby, much as Naughton and Yakubu did good things for us.

 

 

Schmeichel

 

De Laet Morgan Moore Konchesky

 

Knockaert Drinkwater James Dyer

 

Vardy Nugent

[Dan]

Leave it out. All three are/were established internationals.

Bamba was an animal in this league, i particularly remember him keeping Ronaldo quiet in the RM friendly.

 

Established internationals is now seen as a bigger asset to us than how they actually perform? I think that's Sven's reign to a tee.

[Dan]

In TWICE the time.

 

And about half the cost.

[Freeman's Wharfer]

GK - Schmeichel

 

RB - Naughton

CB - Morgan

CB - C Davies

LB - Konchesky

 

RM - Knockaert

CM - Drinkwater

CM - M Davies

LM - Dyer

 

CF - Yakubu

CF - Nugent

 

Subs: Weale, Bamba, De Laet, King, Spearing, Marshall, Vardy

 

That 18 would win this league.

[Dickov22]

The Sven side has absolutely ZERO width which is our key strength this season. Yakubu was pretty lazy- wouldn't fit into our style of play. Bamba was a total liability- I'd much rather have Morgan.

Did love Naughton, but I'm not sure I'd have him ahead of De Laet.

Pearson's team would hammer that team

[Corky]

Says it all really. One side put together by Pearson (after some spending, but largely made whilst clearing up a lot of the previous mess) would quite comfortably thump a side made up of different seasons' worth of players (that was 'built' during our reckless spending era). Mills, Schmeichel, Konchesky and Danns would've never played with Naughton & Yakubu.

 

Here's one - Sven's 10/11 vs Sven's 11/12. Who'd win? I reckon 10/11 and that's what pisses me off the most about him.

 

I believe that Pearson's 09/10 team would beat Sven's lot, just because they'd want it more. How that team finished fifth and Sven never reached the top six is beyond me with the resources he had.

[Dickov22]

I believe that Pearson's 09/10 team would beat Sven's lot, just because they'd want it more. How that team finished fifth and Sven never reached the top six is beyond me with the resources he had.

Because he's totally and utterly useless. A charlatan

[Dan]

I believe that Pearson's 09/10 team would beat Sven's lot, just because they'd want it more. How that team finished fifth and Sven never reached the top six is beyond me with the resources he had.

 

Oh I've no doubt about it. Our first reign under Pearson was a huge breath of fresh air to be fair and it looks like his second is finally turning into one too.

[Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo]

Who has the home advantage?

[HesNotGudjonsonn2]

By the looks of the team above we are including players from Pearson's first reign..i.e. Mark Davies, so if that is the case, instead of Weale as sub keeper, I may opt for David Stockdale, I may go for Tunchev instead of Bamba.