Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
I am Rod Hull

Things We Won't Say About Race That Are True

Recommended Posts

Posted

Really?  We're going to delete my clearly ironically racist post in a thread dedicated to a documentary about over sensitivity to race and nationality issues...  Woosh.

Posted

Haven't had a chance to watch this yet but what was the gist of it?

 

A non white bloke talking about racial/cultural facts and not getting his character assassinated for it.

Posted

I'm very much in the Labour camp, but Diane Abbott is such a ****ing retard. People rip into Milliband, can you imagine if that twat had won the leadership battle.

Posted

No replies from FT`s Liberal elite? didnt think so.

 

Facts and figures seem to pass them by.

 

FT has an elite? I hope I'm not one of those you're thinking about, just because I responded to you previously.

 

What I find odd is that you appear to enjoy this sort of thing. You'll post an article or statistic showing how much one group engages in some activity and then add a bit of jovial sarcasm and a smiley face or two. I always get the impression there's a subtext of "Hey, look everyone! I'm showing you this because I like the idea that one racial group is inferior to the one I belong to!". I dunno, maybe I'm wrong, but that's what it sounds like.

 

The reason, I would suggest, that this thread hasn't had many responses is because people feel uncomfortable engaging you in another of your celebrations about racial differences.

 

PS - And so I can't be accused of ducking the issue (which I never will do, I just won't rejoice in it) my own view is that race has nothing to do with it and that these differences can be entirely put down to cultural attitudes and poverty.

Posted

FT has an elite? I hope I'm not one of those you're thinking about, just because I responded to you previously.

 

What I find odd is that you appear to enjoy this sort of thing. You'll post an article or statistic showing how much one group engages in some activity and then add a bit of jovial sarcasm and a smiley face or two. I always get the impression there's a subtext of "Hey, look everyone! I'm showing you this because I like the idea that one racial group is inferior to the one I belong to!". I dunno, maybe I'm wrong, but that's what it sounds like.

 

The reason, I would suggest, that this thread hasn't had many responses is because people feel uncomfortable engaging you in another of your celebrations about racial differences.

 

PS - And so I can't be accused of ducking the issue (which I never will do, I just won't rejoice in it) my own view is that race has nothing to do with it and that these differences can be entirely put down to cultural attitudes and poverty.

 

Pretty much this. I remember your attitude on the Enoch Powell thread, exulting in the idea of a possible race war, and then you had the brass neck to suggest I was bonkers on account of my scientific knowledge. 

 

It's clear you make some reasoned arguments, but given the way you present them it's hardly a surprise if people don't engage with you.

Posted

Andrew Neil called what she said (white people love to divide and conquer) as racist.

Long term friend Michael Portillo was trying to hide his embarrassment of her stance.

The guest (Good bloke) was clearly against her approach.

Yet Diane is sitting there having been accused of her racist comments, and will continue to do so. And she hasn't been expelled by the Labour party for being a racist.

 

...and they wonder why white people are organizing 'secret' white communities.

 

 

As for the problem of talking about race, they (the elite) never want to know what white people want.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...