cisse4city Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 why dnt we make sum loan signins like sinama pongolle frm liverpool or owusu abeiye frm arsenal they r proven goalscorers in the reserves and cud clearly cut it in the championship?let me no wot u think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cat Burger Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 Ryan Smith!!!! WTF are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SystonFox Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 he's a proper numpty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenFilbert Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 I didn't realise that these 2 were created by the same person. Does he/she/it go to any games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Honcho Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 FFS sort it out will ya! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 Loan signings are fine when they arrive to do a specific job and when there is no other way we would afford or get a top quality player to do a job that is presently being neglected. Hence Ryan Smith and 10/10 for that. But generally loan signings running around like rogue asteroids on a collision course with the "regulars" is not a good idea. We've got 17/18 decent performers in our squad just now which means that, even without loanees, five or six will not be playing. In the wings are talents like Wesolowski, Chambers, Dodds and Sheehan who are certainly close to contention. If Levein decides we need more fire power then he can do something in January. But, we are still not sure what the impact of Gold-Smith will be. Hammond netted for fun when he was playing (for only half the match) and it could be that both he and Hume will benefit. We should certainly know by Christmas and by then Levein will also know if Goal-Smith is going to be here for the rest of the season. Let's keep the ship steady for now. One step at a time and that next step is Gold-Smith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 Because those players ARE NOT available. Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxes_Wizard_Striker Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 I didn't realise that these 2 were created by the same person. Does he/she/it go to any games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 Because those players ARE NOT available. Jesus. I'm sure that's they type of calibre signing Cisse4City is looking for down at The Walkers. Feed the 5000 and all that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anish Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 why dnt we make sum loan signins like sinama pongolle frm liverpool or owusu abeiye frm arsenal they r proven goalscorers in the reserves and cud clearly cut it in the championship?let me no wot u think Because this is real life, not Football Manager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 He only asked, not sure that type of response is warranted especially as it's very early posting by cisse4city and theyt could have been thinking for days on what to post. On the other hand wtf does the name cisse4city mean, is that another loan wanted instead of Pongolle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyTrev Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 Ryan Smith, Elvis Hammond? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparky Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 even if we wanted him he would never come here . FACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cisono Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 Loan signings are fine when they arrive to do a specific job and when there is no other way we would afford or get a top quality player to do a job that is presently being neglected. Hence Ryan Smith and 10/10 for that. But generally loan signings running around like rogue asteroids on a collision course with the "regulars" is not a good idea. ... In the wings are talents like Wesolowski, Chambers, Dodds and Sheehan who are certainly close to contention. If Levein decides we need more fire power then he can do something in January. You cannot simply build a team out of loan signings... and mixing a significant number of loan players with the regular team is also not a very good idea, as Thracian explained. I reckon we have lots of talent emerging from our academy anyway... if what we have is not enough, I agree with Thracian again that Levein can still do something about getting that missing player (probably striker) in January... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bert Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 Loan signings are good to help you out when your down to the bare bones or if you are lacking in a certain department until the transfer window opens, but for the long term future of the club it isn't good because we need a settled squad, chopping and changing doesn't help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxes_Trust Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 why dnt we make sum loan signins like sinama pongolle frm liverpool or owusu abeiye frm arsenal they r proven goalscorers in the reserves and cud clearly cut it in the championship?let me no wot u think We were in for Pongolle early in the season but he didn't want to come Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationwider Posted 28 October 2005 Share Posted 28 October 2005 We were in for Pongolle early in the season but he didn't want to come Any info on what the terms might have been? A whole season, or just a month or two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shen Posted 29 October 2005 Share Posted 29 October 2005 We were in for Pongolle early in the season but he didn't want to come We were?... Wow what a scoop that would have been I'm pleased with the squad we've got now though. Once Wesolowski is back and Chambo/Sheehan are regularly competing for a place in the squad, we should be well equipped to challenge anyone in this league. On paper at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gené and Tonic Posted 29 October 2005 Share Posted 29 October 2005 Shame we didn't get Pongolle, he could have become a crowds favourite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.