boosmanana Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 One of the strikers we are looking at is David Johnson of Forest. I know this for a fact as my dad's mate is best mates with David Johnson
Babylon Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 now you mention it... I would not be supprised!!! I'd be fairly happy with that to be honest.
Cal Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 Forest will over value him like all their players. they wanted 5Mil for Williams (I think) Before it was sorted out at a tribunal.
Guest CL Blue Army Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 Good signing I think however many critics would say he's another Akinibyi and would get him low on confidence! Should be given a chance but don't think other fans will see it like that
Leicester_Mad Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 Johnson was released by Forest after a fall out with Megson
Cal Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 Oo released, Thats good. I dont know much about Johnson so cant really say if he's a good signing or not =]
Hazza Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 I thought he was just transfer listed, though i imagine Forest will let him go for free, or a small sum. I probably wouldn't go for it, he's not been good for over a year now, is on £15,000 a week and doesn't have a great deal of pace, which is the attribute i'd prefer any new forward to have.
davieG Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 One of the strikers we are looking at is David Johnson of Forest. I know this for a fact as my dad's mate is best mates with David Johnson 139079[/snapback] Well can you tell your Dad to tell his mate to tell David's Johnson best mate that the next time he's sees David Johnson that we don't want him. Cheers B) B) B)
Louise Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 No thanks. And I doubt we are. He's not played well for two seasons, he's on big money, he's got a discipline problem and he'll be 30 when the season starts so hardly fits into Levein's youth policy. That aside he's got a 5 year contract still at Forest (I think) so he's hardly likely to want to move here for less money probably on a shorter contract.
Hitesh Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 He was alrite at Ipswich for a couple of seasons but couldnt hack it in the premiership. IMO, he would be good as a backup but i dont know if he would be prepared to sit on the bench most of the season. We need competiton for places up front and he would add to it. I would say he is one of the better strikers available.
Bert Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 I thought he was just transfer listed, though i imagine Forest will let him go for free, or a small sum.I probably wouldn't go for it, he's not been good for over a year now, is on £15,000 a week and doesn't have a great deal of pace, which is the attribute i'd prefer any new forward to have. 139105[/snapback] None of our three 1st choice forwards have sublime pace! but i do agree with the next forward we bring in having a nice bit of pace about him because of this reason!!
Ricey Posted 17 July 2005 Posted 17 July 2005 Lincoln were interested in him a few weeks back, says it all. Please Craig do not sign Johnson, I'll be fuming if we do. He is too old and not good enough as he proved last year.
Hazza Posted 17 July 2005 Posted 17 July 2005 I thought he was just transfer listed, though i imagine Forest will let him go for free, or a small sum.I probably wouldn't go for it, he's not been good for over a year now, is on £15,000 a week and doesn't have a great deal of pace, which is the attribute i'd prefer any new forward to have. 139105[/snapback] None of our three 1st choice forwards have sublime pace! but i do agree with the next forward we bring in having a nice bit of pace about him because of this reason!! 139177[/snapback] That's why i wasn't keen on him coming
LoneWolf Posted 17 July 2005 Posted 17 July 2005 One of the strikers we are looking at is David Johnson of Forest. I know this for a fact as my dad's mate is best mates with David Johnson 139079[/snapback] Well can you tell your Dad to tell his mate to tell David's Johnson best mate that the next time he's sees David Johnson that we don't want him. Cheers B) B) B) 139108[/snapback] ::::::
Foxes_Wizard_Striker Posted 17 July 2005 Posted 17 July 2005 he is one of nottingham forest players who go to nightclub befiore a relegation decider against Burnley?
Janx Posted 18 July 2005 Posted 18 July 2005 He's got a trick knee hasn't he? Hmm sicknote in the waiting!
AyewJoking Posted 18 July 2005 Posted 18 July 2005 I dont think fans should be too excited about this "new striker" we're going to sign. He wont be a big name, more of a back up player as Levein thinks his strongest pair is Connolly and MDV.
Alexikokopops Posted 18 July 2005 Posted 18 July 2005 I dont think fans should be too excited about this "new striker" we're going to sign. He wont be a big name, more of a back up player as Levein thinks his strongest pair is Connolly and MDV. 139873[/snapback] According to MadBiker the two strikers we're looking at are "established".
Babylon Posted 18 July 2005 Posted 18 July 2005 I dont think fans should be too excited about this "new striker" we're going to sign. He wont be a big name, more of a back up player as Levein thinks his strongest pair is Connolly and MDV. 139873[/snapback] According to MadBiker the two strikers we're looking at are "established". 139876[/snapback] yes.... every one has "established" that they are shit.
Ric Flair Posted 18 July 2005 Posted 18 July 2005 I dont think fans should be too excited about this "new striker" we're going to sign. He wont be a big name, more of a back up player as Levein thinks his strongest pair is Connolly and MDV. 139873[/snapback] According to MadBiker the two strikers we're looking at are "established". 139876[/snapback] 2 strikers???????? I wish Levein would make up his mind how many he wants. First 2, then 1, then none, then 1 and now 2 again. Go on Craig get 5.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.