foxinsocks

If we appoint king then one day we will sack him

He was free last year and no one wanted him

Moyse showed dyche up

If top's management of kp is anything like his performance at lcfc.... then kp are in big trouble. They have bought an adult in... but it may be too late. Astonishing that rudkin couldn't have advised top better in how to run a monopoly duty free empire.

Are arsenal in for Bilal?

We don't have enough fans to speak up. Maybe football isn't such a big part of their lives..... but they dilute the passion of those who do care.

While he is injured, do we get an insurance payout to cover his wages?

Top has been sacked by his own company

I think he owns the club himself. He will do what rudkin tells him.

Precisely. Top will now have more time to action rudkins plans. I believe that the kp Twitter account is the forum to embarass Top... to maje sure everyone in Bangkok knows how he is using poor quality advisors to wreck lcfc

The foxes trust were warned that agreeing to the club's FAB proposals would mean that the club controlled the whole thing - and yet they signed up to it last summer I welcome their repentance - but thery should have had the balls to stand up to the club last year.

Isn't it that one guy? - I am sure there are many LGBT members who don't agree with him. He didn't get selected from the FCC but the club gave him one of the supporters spots on the FAB... yet those spots were for ordinary fans not FCC guys (NB: the fcc is appointed by the club!)

Me too - I urged the trust to withdraw support. IMO it would have been hard for the club to go ahead while in dispute with the supporters trust. I think at the AGM you saw the trust admit that they got played. Frankly the FAB thing is a disgrace - the club seek to have control - yet listening to the views of fans would be an opportunity to learn .... the FAB would not compel them to actually do anything so I wonder why they are so scared?

we haven't got such a guy

spot on

You're right. My point was that he must have been crazy to think he could do it in the epl - and then when all the evidence was that it was failing... he carried on. Who wants a blinkered leader?

Southampton did not have the players to play out from the back in the epl... madness. RM kept doing it until he lost his job. This blindness is what worries me. Sure it all worked great in championship but was never going to pass muster in epl

Let's remember how he could ghost past players... I haven't seen him do that in a long time

No output

bob martin... things might perk up a bit

I think they won't sack ruud coz they don't want to admit another mistake.

Earless

You are awful

I agree. I think the problem is that they are stuck with a costbase due to gambling on rodgers ability to deliver regular ecl participation and over paying wages so that no one can leave. Until this is resolved we will find it tight whatever the psr rules are. We should never pay a player more than they could get elsewhere (watch vestegaard see out his conract) and we should always sell with 12 months to go if a new contract cannot be agreed. Only when we have a squad on sensible wages will we have the flexibility to invest upon any re promotion to the epl. Last year all we could afford was a guy out of contract at fulham and two chaps surplus to requirement at palace .... not going to keep us up was it.

The psr rules are apparently to prevent rouge owners gambling with the future of a club (like Bury). Imo this could be solved by having owners place a bond with the epl or eft that they forfit up on administration.... so they can't just walk away. The current system is anti competitive... preventing well funded clubs from rising up. It also allows non first team business activities to cover for breaches (selling a hotel or ladies team) The whole thing is tin pot