st albans fox

They hadn’t thought of it Chelsea ‘announced’ it in April since then villa and Everton have jumped on the bandwagon we couldn’t cos we weren’t a PL club come June 30

I didn’t know kasey had an add on and Leeds aren’t staying up

He did and you can’t 😄

preferred lies on fairways yesterday. Not sure about today. I think he was on the green anyway he seemed to rush that putt.

Can’t do that in the championship if we’d stayed up then we could have

12 + 8 = 24?

So that’s £5m which ain’t great. 5+5 seems a strange deal. Hopefully the guaranteed elenent is 7m+ ???

God it’s a tough watch! and getting tougher 3 massive holes coming up for him 11/12/13

‘A deal worth £10m’ that could include add ons

We were told his RC was £30m the papers this morning say that palace have had two bids rejected In reality, we don’t know anything

I mean he could try and prove none of it’s true …..

Wellbek has missed xg around 1.25 on his own!

Everyone knew the eze fee was 60m+ palace had set it at 68m we’ll see what we get when he leaves (if it’s not undisclosed )

Presumably they are intending paying less than that

I think his issue in playing out is that he’s often playing passes ‘too straight’ towards the midfielder or defender. The player receiving the ball doesn’t want a straight pass directly towards him when he’s under pressure. They want to be taking the ball at an angle of some kind (depending where their pressure is coming from).. You’d have thought that if he’s going to master this then he’d have done it by now.

Winks doesn’t really fit the profile cos we only signed him on a three year deal. You’d have thought our intention was to get him to sign a new deal in year 2, try and get a nominal fee end year 2 or to let him walk away at the end of year 3. The walk away was a solid option when we signed him - unlike players on 5 year deals. the shenanigans with Ruud have muddied the waters and if he’s miffed with the club then I van understand that (I may not agree with it). picking skipp ahead of him is strange and must reflect off the pitch considerations.

Depends who will need to be sold of he isn’t perhaps he’ll pay the price for all those who have seen out their contracts and left for free (because of the shambles that our club is in failing to sell players mid contract)

Sorry to hear that CF

Obviously but then you have a player who doesn’t want to be here and won’t give 100% we’ve been here before and it doesn’t work - most importantly it leads to miserable players seeing out their contracts and us losing out financially.

Tommy beginning to scramble a bit too much he could do with an eight shot lead at the turn tomorrow !

Reckon they’ll be looking at a couple of options hopefully that doesn’t mean this drags on until the end of the window which means we can’t do any business we might have wanted to

35 yards ?

Could be a problem if the player decides he wants spurs and they won’t pay what palace have offered whilst we can stand our ground, we can’t insist the player goes to palace, nor can we insist that spurs pay what palace have offered. We’d have to be prepared to scupper any sale and have a very peed off player.

Nathan jones thinks he has a fifteen inch cock

You can’t rely on a player sale to balance your books. Injuries ???