st albans fox

i don’t really think this should be debated on here because no one knows what happened. When there is eventually a full enquiry in Israel all the facts will come out. (I guess probs not till post netenyahu) . The IDF have previously confirmed killing around a dozen civilians in kibbutz be’eri when shelling a building holding terrorist infiltrators who were holding captives. It’s not clear whether this was as a result of Hannibal or just poor coms in a stressful environment. Gallant confirmed in an interview last week that the directive had been issued in some instances on that day. He didn’t say where and he didn’t say when. Everything else is pure conjecture. Gallant also has an agenda which may explain his actions. as mentioned so many times over the past 18 months, whilst a war is ongoing, there’s pretty much no information out of the middle east that’s trustworthy, irrespective of where it comes from.

I agree - maybe once fit for purpose, auto offsides can be used like goal line tech and we can dispense with var as we currently have it ??

Yes - this is why all the owners (apart from Forest and wolves) are full square behind var and of course it would

I agree but then what if this was the last game of the season and we needed a point to stay up ???

Yes 45 mins each way

Don’t mention the cheese ………

If you take pride inflation into account it isn’t

We’ve done nothing to be criticised on with monga. It’s the system which stinks and will probably see him leave in the summer and our comp will be v small when set against the upside that the club he goes to has. I guess that once our destiny is confirmed we may see him getting some minutes on the pitch to try and bump up that comp.

This is what most of us assumed.

Four mistakes in added time a) ref gives a dodgy handball decision. He’d barely given anything all game allowing most 50/50 calls to go unpunished - made this free kick call even more ridiculous b) whoever is marking maguire knows he’s offside. So he either goes with him and makes a challenge or he puts his arm up to at least make the lino think about whether he’s seen it. In any case , stick your arm up afterwards if you’ve gone with the player to make a challenge - but nothing - no challenge and no appeal to the lino. Sums up our passive nature. c) mads should be coming out and taking charge. That ball is in the air a long time. It isn’t a driven cross. He has issues with managing his area and someone should have done something in our coaching set up to help him. d) the lino screwed up big time.

If we were three down - yes Not for him but for our fee when he goes !

Neeed to go to Manchester to visit the Man City complex so we killed two birds with one stone lateral thinking

More pissed about the free kick being given tbh Lino screws up as you say, how is that handball ???.

Lost all confidence and his mojo since he got injured last autumn

Lost his mojo and confidence

Thansk god we sacked copper - he’d have exploded after those two calls !

We were playing better back then aswell!

True but hardly anyone chooses to watch our game in full unless it’s the chosen one

I don think you’re guessing I think this (and the comments re next seasons first team squad) are exactly that they’ve at least tried to learn from nyoni and the lad that went to Man City. Raise the profiles and get more dosh.

Yeah - I’m sorry ……..won’t happen again ………

Length of a mangers contract isn’t relevant when compared to a player. A player has to be paid out in full. A manager will usually have a capped period of notice after termination of their contract - often 12 months.

Very rude about the Qataris …. They’re still paying off the previous administration

Doesn’t rudkin need to to be able to add up to do whelan’s job ??

Yes I know that they’re common but people are assuming that this deal was like that and we have no evidence whatsoever that this is the case I’ve seen plenty of deals like this described as ‘option to buy which becomes an obligation on promotion or no of games played’. Usually if it’s loan with straight obligation (which is more than possible here as that’s all we’ve had via ornstein) then that means the buying club want to stick the fee into their next financial year. That’s perhaps what made us reject.

There’s no evidence that it was there’s more evidence that it isn’t - as in it wasn’t mentioned by ornstein. an obligation based on meeting criteria isn’t an obligation is it !