PhillippaT

Kings, Princes, Knights, Barons, Squires of Duty Free!

In THIS econonomy?

Faes helped them win? Really? ROTFLMAO.

Time to start a potential list in chonological order?

Leicester winning it is one of the reasons it's now getting as bad as it is - because they don't want it to happen again....

That's far too sensible - you're on the wrong forum for that

Is he even a football player? (Did he win a competition or sumat? )

Praising Rudkin? Is that allowed round here?

Pantomime or Punch and Judy?

What'd I do this time?

I beleive the applicable phrase is: "From the sublime to the cor blimey..."

I just got back from a trip into 'town'. (Still doesn't feel right saying 'city' for some reason ) Didn't miss much then? Not worth watching the lowlights?

Knock Knock...

Why can't they both lose dammit

I felt worse watching the replay on MOTD than I did watching it live... Life is wierd like that, I guess?

Definitely feels a lot worse than 2 years ago...

7 days was all they wrote - a definite ultimatum note

For now... EDIT: I just noticed the header pic for the forum

"You can never have too many cushions" - my wife, @1:40 21/05/2025. we'll see if this still holds true later on...

That sinking feeling you get when you open up the forum and THIS is the first thread that isn't pinned at the top...

Didn't all our winning squad get street names for them in some new housing development somewhere? (IIRC)

Note: 'Worthwhile' doesn't necessarily mean the best, just not bad - something worth watching...

Considering the definite 'end of an era' vibe we have now, can we/does anyone trust Top et al. to create a new one that's worthwhile...?

NO IT'S NOT - WHICH IS THE ENTIRE REASON FOR WHY LEE and YOU ARE MAKING the WRONG ASSUMPTIONS. It was NEVER intended to be 'ACCURATE' for a 'person'-eye-view. THAT is the mistake you both make, from the outset, which makes everything else completely moot. Again, arguing on behalf of your own asumptions is also going to cause problems purely for yourself. Adding a camera to a helmet GIVES A HELMET-EYE VIEW, not a 'person-eye view'. But THIS IS ENTIRELY RECOGNISED AND UNDERSTOOD in pretty much ALL sports which use it. The fact that you and Lee do NOT, is YOUR PROBLEM, not anyone else's. I've seen a lot of US sports broadcast which specifically mention it being a helmet cam, not a 'person'-cam, for this very reason. Again, helmet cams are very common and well understood for what they are. If YOU don't understand what they are, and the ramificaitons of that, then that's on you. If you don't like them, then I think the broadcasting world has already shown it doesn't care what you think.