SouthStandUpperTier

Makes a mockery of the minimum age limit for Seniors Snooker being 40.

For the love of God! Won't somebody think about the coefficient!?

Yes, it's seriously good news for Southampton. He's been comfortably the worst goalkeeper in the Championship, statistically speaking.

Why are these still available to buy at full price with only 4 games left?

As much as I liked the Schlupperman, KDH is streets ahead of him ability-wise. Jeff could play his whole career in the Championship and not get 25 goal contributions. Remember, he failed as a striker, then failed as a winger, before finally finding a home as an ok-ish fullback. Yes, he's racked up a lot of appearances for Palace in the Prem, but basically only as a utility squad player, filling in here and there and just doing a job when others haven't been available.

I think our general play is better when Daka plays. But that becomes meaningless if you can't put your chances away.

If it's any consolation, I think you are one of the most winningest posters on the FoxesTalk roster.

They've taken over from Leeds as Sky's favourites and are now officially The Best Team in The World.

Preston?

Making sh*t up. Future career in politics perhaps?

He certainly puts himself about more than the other 3. Whether that is to any great effect is open to debate though. Tackles & Interceptions per 90 Daka 1.18 Nacho 0.69 Vardy 0.56 Cannon 0.43

Defence and goalkeeper are weaknesses, but there really is no excuse for Southgate for us not to be battering everyone 7-3 at the Euros.

He wins plenty of regular tour events. He just can't seem to get over the line in the majors anymore. However, I don't think moving to LIV will help him in this regard.

Just win 3 out of our 4 remaining games. Then it doesn't matter what anyone else does.

It's debatable whether Soyuncu was good value. He was good for only about 18 months of his 5 years here then left for nothing.

The Championship is where it will get difficult for them, but League One should be fairly plain sailing for them if they want to spend the cash.

They can inject as much cash as they want. Wouldn't be surprised if at some point they turned that debt into equity. https://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/scmp.php Clubs in the League 1 and League 2 operate within a Spending Constraint framework termed Salary Cost Management Protocol (SMCP). SCMP limits spending on player wages to a percentage of club Turnover. In League 1 clubs can spend a maximum of 60% of their turnover on wages - in League 2, the limit is 55%. There are no restrictions (in themselves) on the amount a club can lose or spend on transfer fees. Under the SCMP rules, the definition of 'Turnover' is particularly important as Turnover is used to determine the maximum wage-spend. Within a traditional accounting perspective, there are usually only three elements of turnover: Match-day Income Commercial Income (such as sponsorship) TV revenue (and any 'merit payments' based on league position) However the Football League use a is broader definition of Turnover. Crucially, the FL Turnover figure includes donations from the owners to the club and injections of equity. Loans from club owners are understandably not included in the Turnover figure as these would result in growing club debts. up club debts. In League 1 and League 2, a wealthy owner can therefore fund the club spending in a way that is not permitted in other divisions. Manchester City and Leicester for example seem set for punishment for their excessive losses (from UEFA and the Championship respectively) despite the fact that the owners have injected hard cash into the club to finance the spending.

Which he blatantly copied from Wes Matthews, the NBA player, who'd been doing it for several years before Barnes. Cue another stream of annoyance from @foxile5

Excitement fizzled out in the end. Not Scheffler's fault. He's a machine and doesn't make the silly mistakes the others do.

West Brom matched them last year. Why didn't a similar sized club match them this year? Oh yes, because he was totally ineffective for them.

More big chances being missed. It's catching.

I've now seen posts calling for Fatawu and KDH to be dropped. Yes, the 2 players who are 1st and 3rd in the entire division for big chances created. People genuinely want them punished because the strikers who keep letting them down can't finish their dinner.

"...dancing away from Tielemans..." You could moonwalk away from Tielemans.