ian__marshall
Member-
Posts
1,623 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by ian__marshall
-
Realistic Managerial Replacements
ian__marshall replied to winteriscoming's topic in Leicester City Forum
If he's available we 100% have to do everything possible to bring him in. I think he'd be a great fit for our club even more so with where we find ourselves. I just hope the 'he's ex-foest mob' that made Cooper's tenure virtually impossible give this one half a chance. -
FFS @spacemunky, was about to post a grovelling reply in the hope you would have a change of heart. Like @Rajhighlighted, posters like yourself, along with our resident Wolves and Watford contributors are what make this community so great. Pleased to hear you aren't actually leaving 👍.
-
LCFC 3-4 Southampton, post-match thread
ian__marshall replied to Phil Mitchell's topic in Leicester City Forum
I was thinking that last night, but it all comes from the leadership. Appreciate it's probably a communal space but can you imagine the reaction of Sir Alex Ferguson to that nonsense after a defeat like that. There would have been tea cups and F bombs flying everywhere if anyone was making such a racket. Instead, everyone would have been mindful of his presence and aura and it would have been like a library. Tells you a lot about the current state of the club. -
Realistic Managerial Replacements
ian__marshall replied to winteriscoming's topic in Leicester City Forum
I completely agree. Two weeks ago Top mentioned in his interview that a Technical Director was 'close' yet there's been no appointment and barely a whisper of who it could be. It's clear as day that there is no vision or strategy underpinning what we are trying to achieve, and any plans are either built on sand or nonexistent. We really have two incompetent individuals steering the ship and we're heading for the mother of all icebergs. -
LCFC 3-4 Southampton, post-match thread
ian__marshall replied to Phil Mitchell's topic in Leicester City Forum
Love Kingy but that was a poor post match interview. -
LCFC 3-4 Southampton, post-match thread
ian__marshall replied to Phil Mitchell's topic in Leicester City Forum
Genuinely feel sick after that one. It's as if someone has repeatedly punched me in the stomach. We are such a mess. Just how have we ended up in this situation? What's worrying is that it feels like there's more to come. If we go down it's going to create a whole world of new problems with the liabilities we have. I'm just waiting for someone to wake me up from this nightmare. If I didn't know better I'd think a Forest fan had taken charge and deliberately sabotaged us, except I don't even believe the most hardcore Forest fan could do such a job of screwing us over. Just so low, and lost for words... -
LCFC 3-4 Southampton, post-match thread
ian__marshall replied to Phil Mitchell's topic in Leicester City Forum
When was the last time we conceded a 3 goal lead... Wolves away?!? -
No chance. We're too far off the pace. You're looking at 2-3 months.
-
Don't know how we sort this. Team just aren't physically fit enough. Too late in the season to sort it out. Unbelievable that we've thrown a 3 goal lead away. Inexcusable.
-
Just how?!?
-
Don't know why but think I might actually go tonight unless I have a last minute change of heart. That said if we end up 2 down by half time I'll head home. Can't believe I'm saying that but this is where at with the club at the moment.
-
Realistic Managerial Replacements
ian__marshall replied to winteriscoming's topic in Leicester City Forum
This thread has been fun today. Pretty much 'hot' all day. We've had Rowett, Skubala, Gerard, Martin, and now Smith all nailed on at some point, yet despite a gazillion posts none of us have a clue. Can't wait to see what tomorrow brings -
Realistic Managerial Replacements
ian__marshall replied to winteriscoming's topic in Leicester City Forum
Sure one of the podcasts said if Gerard takes a job in the UK this financial year he's going to get stung with a huge tax bill. Not sure how true it is, but I'm hoping it's correct as I don't want him anywhere near our club, would be a complete disaster. -
Realistic Managerial Replacements
ian__marshall replied to winteriscoming's topic in Leicester City Forum
Not saying it does, just don't think giving a job of this magnitude given where we sit in the table to someone who has only had 33 games behind them, nearly all of which are at a lower level, would not be a wise idea. We need someone who has experience in these types of situations if we hope to survive. The pressure on whoever comes in will be massive. -
Realistic Managerial Replacements
ian__marshall replied to winteriscoming's topic in Leicester City Forum
Really hope it's not Skubala. The position we find ourselves in is no position for taking a gamble on an unproven manager who's had half a decent season managing 1st team football in the league below. That said, it likely will be him simply because Rudkin will love the fact he was a former P.E. teacher. -
Realistic Managerial Replacements
ian__marshall replied to winteriscoming's topic in Leicester City Forum
Reckon it's Top. He did say the other week that he would have helped if he could play. That was obviously not an option, but he can manage (allegedly...) -
Foxes Trust Survey on Fan Engagement Framework
ian__marshall replied to Foxes_Trust's topic in Leicester City Forum
Completed -
If Kingy is in charge and it looks highly likely he will be, can we not just go with 442 for this game. Literally any player who's ever kicked a ball knows how to play in this system, it's almost hardwired into a footballer. I understand why you wouldn't play the system against Man City as Pep would overload the midfield and tear you a new one, but this is the Championship and system football has no place in this league. We might also offer something upfront for once. I'm just at the point now where we need to stop repeating ourselves and try something different. Take things back to basics, make us hard to beat, and start creating some actual chances to score a goal or two.
-
Don't know who's more deluded, Top for thinking Rudkin does a good job, or the PL for thinking we warranted a 20 point deduction. On that basis alone, their golden child Man City should be looking at around 2300 points deducted if it's effectively 20 points per 3 charges. Somehow can't see that happening 🤔
-
In the grand scheme of things I think we should take it. No point appealing. Suck it and move on.
-
Realistic Managerial Replacements
ian__marshall replied to winteriscoming's topic in Leicester City Forum
Not sure why it's taking so long, but reading the Man City forum prior to Mukasa signing, some of their lot seemed convinced that they wouldn't have loaned him to us without assurances over how he'd be utilised, so you'd have thought the board had a couple of names that were presumably shared with Man City for them to sign off on the deal. -
Apologies for the delayed reply, been very busy since my last post and haven't had a chance to respond. As mentioned previously, I'm not saying there isn't inherent risk to the workforce, however this in my view is down to individual agility. To answer your first point, I don't assume anything, and certainly not that the environment would remain constant. Everything evolves, it's the foundations upon which humanity has grown. Yes, I agree that there is scope for replication, but ask yourself where the value in that sits. Why go to such lengths if the solution already exists. Whilst I don't disagree that there will be people out there who will copy everything and create their own versions, by the same measure there are plenty who'd choose to put their time to more productive use and use others products/services. Furthermore, competition is there to be embraced. It is healthy, and drives us to achieve better things and enhance efficiency. With regards to your second point, I disagree on the degree to which it will impact employment levels. This reminds very much of the Miner situation back in 80s. There will inevitably be people unwilling to adapt to the changes ahead and undoubtedly these people will get left behind and most probably face severe poverty, however those that reskill will thrive. There is unlikely to be a shortage of jobs for many decades. As AI grows, we know demands for energy grow, meaning there will be enormous opportunities in both Green Energy technological development, along with infrastructure deployment to feed the data centres. Furthermore, as AI systems become more sophisticated, demand for chips increases and with that industries associated with identifying and mining precious metals/refinement increases. There was an article only a few weeks ago about a British company (SpaceForge) that are looking to manufacture semiconductors in Space due to increases in efficiency, which if successful will undoubtedly establish a new industry for the UK. The next logical step is Quantum Computing, which will create further jobs in R&D, increase demand for Physicists, Data Scientists, Production Workers, etc. Downstream we then have Quantum Networks, and all of the associated industries in research, production, infrastructure deployment, and Space. Alongside this there will be huge needs for regulatory guardrails which will create new roles in legislative governance. These are just some examples, there will be many many other opportunities that arise as a result as the technology develops. As I said above, i'm not saying there won't be people that experience unemployment as a result of AI, of course there will. However, I genuinely believe that the opportunities that the technology offer far outweigh the potential negatives, especially when you consider the potential to empower people of all backgrounds by removing the social constructs that have historically held people back and created a closed shop for a select few.
-
Have we actually been found to be in breach of 23/24 by either league though? I thought this was the point argued by Demarco, that due to the way the rules were written and the transfer of our PL shares transferring too early it meant we were outside of the jurisdiction of both leagues, I.e. Outside of the PL jurisdiction for 22/23, but not in the EFL long enough to apply their rules. My understanding of the amendment in April was that it was a bilateral agreement between the leagues that therefore opened the door to the PL to pursue the 22/23 breach. I might be talking absolute nonsense, and from what I've read from your posts you are infinitely more clued up on this topic than I am, but this is just my recollection from April when this rule change applied. Again I might be wrong, but I vaguely recall that this rule change is what allowed the case to be reviewed by the IC as up until that point the PL were all out of options. Would explain why the following month the case was then referred to the IC. Happy to be proven wrong, just this was my interpretation of events.
