87fox

13:00

I feel like you're missing the point, or maybe I didn't make it very well – which is very possible. I'm well aware that comments breed more comments. If someone replies to one of your posts (if they could make any sense of them) dismissing it by saying 'does it really matter?' it's not particularly a) constructive to the ongoing conversation or b) inclusive or welcoming for others who don't post on the forum regularly.

Maybe that's the answer, but that's not the only potential inaccuracy Rob Dorsett appears to spout. See @Ric Flair's post above mine for more. But maybe it's not the answer. That's why I asked Geoff what his opinion was on it. Do you really have to butt in and question the validity of my question to Geoff on a football forum designed for discussing such things? No wonder you have so many posts.

If Dorsett and Percy are similarly well-connected, how come Percy regularly states Tielemans was £32m and Dorsett states he was £40m? It's a pretty big difference. Edit: @mod hero beat me to it!

It's definitely possible they've changed their tactic since the first couple of days due to negative feedback. I hope so!

Directly from them when I got in contact on Wednesday. Here's their opening gambit. They said the stuff about the Cinema/re-subscription prices during the subsequent conversation.

Unfortunately once you eventually get through to Sky they very quickly make it clear they aren't offering to pause your subscription, it's just a marketing ploy which has given them an incredible amount of positive publicity. What they are offering is to let you cancel Sky Sports without any minimum term fees applying. On the face of it this might seem like a good idea, but if, like me, you have an offer, eg £15pm for Sports instead of full price (£28pm?), they won't honour that when you re-subscribe to Sports and you'll likely be paying full price, or at least have to renegot

I've sent a request. Currently training for my first half marathon in April.

Matt Elliott!