limeydale Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 McGregor could of had at least 2 points deducted
GaelicFox Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 9 minutes ago, foxes_rule1978 said: Still 49 - 0 ... exhibitions don't count which this was That's a fair point but Mcgregor is a dangerous man , mayweather took a risk and deserves 50-0 for that
GaelicFox Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 Just now, limeydale said: McGregor could of had at least 2 points deducted At least ! He was constantly humping him like a randy jack Russell riding the vacuum cleaner
foxes_rule1978 Posted 27 August 2017 Author Posted 27 August 2017 Just now, GaelicFox said: That's a fair point but Mcgregor is a dangerous man , mayweather took a risk and deserves 50-0 for that this joke of McGregor being dangerous, he isn't in a boxing bout, he is just a bum and was proven so tonight... stopped by a 42 year old who isn't known for is KO's lol... not 50-0
GaelicFox Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 3 minutes ago, foxes_rule1978 said: this joke of McGregor being dangerous, he isn't in a boxing bout, he is just a bum and was proven so tonight... stopped by a 42 year old who isn't known for is KO's lol... not 50-0 Bum you stayed away to watch a bum fight That sir makes you an idiot then , off to bed with you
ROB-THE-BLUE Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 It's a bit of a rip off for punters who bet on a specific round for the fight to end. Floyd could have ended that at pretty much any point. But I guess anyone naive enough to bet on a scripted pantomime deserves what they get
ROB-THE-BLUE Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 5 minutes ago, GaelicFox said: Bum you stayed away to watch a bum fight That sir makes you an idiot then , off to bed with you CM isn't a bum obviously... but he's not a dangerous man in a boxing ring either.
limeydale Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 Just now, Turbogre said: Biggest let down since home alone 3 Oh not at all I'm still chuckling and will every time I think about it for years to come
yorkie1999 Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 12 minutes ago, GaelicFox said: That's a fair point but Mcgregor is a dangerous man , mayweather took a risk and deserves 50-0 for that I think the only risk mayweather took was whether or not he could make it at least look like real fight and not totally ruin his reputation in boxing. Did mcgregor actually land a proper punch.
the fox Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 What is really amazing is the stamina required to be a pro boxer! Mayweather is a retired 40 year old man.
limeydale Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 His upper cut early on was sweet and I think gave Mayweather pause
Finnaldo Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 BREAKING NEWS: Over the hill boxer annihilates amateur in glorified charity match of the century.
Jimothy Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 1 minute ago, Finnaldo said: BREAKING NEWS: Over the hill boxer annihilates amateur in glorified charity match of the century. If only it was for charity!
Finnaldo Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 4 minutes ago, Facecloth said: If only it was for charity! The charity is an important lesson to all the fookin whoppers who stayed until 4 to watch an outcome that was almost predetermined and paid money for the privilege: don't flock to everything that glistens, especially when it's just a golden turd!
Manwell Pablo Posted 27 August 2017 Posted 27 August 2017 Seems to be a lot of the king fox style giving it large once the outcomes in up in here.
GaelicFox Posted 28 August 2017 Posted 28 August 2017 9 hours ago, Manwell Pablo said: Seems to be a lot of the king fox style giving it large once the outcomes in up in here. From people who stayed up or got up to watch it we Pabs on the other hand MADE CASH !!!
Collymore Posted 28 August 2017 Posted 28 August 2017 Mayweather seems to use an Aikido style (see video below) in his boxing where he uses his opponents strength to defeat them. McGregor says he's a master of all fighting traditions but going so offensive against Mayweather was the worst thing he could have done. He couldn't really go defensive either, so he could never win either way. I suppose going so offensive was more of a crowd pleaser so I presume that' why he did...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.