Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Dom kellett

Dragovic

By Dom kellett, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

themightyfin

themightyfin

Posted
Posted

Maybe just maybe City made it clear to Drag that they fully intend to sign him close season if he’s committed.

Drags response was he wanted to keep his options open and see what offers are on the table.

City saw this as a sign of a player who could not give 100% commitment and was one of the reasons Morgan was brought back in when fit. 

Maybe CP is not the bad guy in this after all as things have to be right for all concerned.

Just saying.......

  • Thanks 2
1972 Fox

1972 Fox

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, themightyfin said:

Maybe just maybe City made it clear to Drag that they fully intend to sign him close season if he’s committed.

Drags response was he wanted to keep his options open and see what offers are on the table.

City saw this as a sign of a player who could not give 100% commitment and was one of the reasons Morgan was brought back in when fit. 

Maybe CP is not the bad guy in this after all as things have to be right for all concerned.

Just saying.......

Seems a perfectly feasible scenario to me.

gurru991

gurru991

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, themightyfin said:

Maybe just maybe City made it clear to Drag that they fully intend to sign him close season if he’s committed.

Drags response was he wanted to keep his options open and see what offers are on the table.

City saw this as a sign of a player who could not give 100% commitment and was one of the reasons Morgan was brought back in when fit. 

Maybe CP is not the bad guy in this after all as things have to be right for all concerned.

Just saying.......

You missed your calling ... you could be writing fiction

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Popular Post
NotTheMarketLeader

NotTheMarketLeader

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, cropstonfox said:

Morgans better in the air and stronger in the tackle.How many goals has he cost us since his return

Come off it Dragovic is the way forward.

 

Wes’s head must be the shape of a new pound coin;can’t direct headers for shit and the timing

 of jumping when attacking is appalling.

 

Chelsea’s first goal the other day would be one. 

 

He was a yard further back than the other two defenders; who were in line; playing Morata onside I believe.

 

That aside he’s done alright, I just don’t see the sense in not employing a footballing centre back when that is what Puel wants. A centre back who impressed, has a future, and who was part of a 5 game run without conceding.

 

Watch the Chelsea away game and then explain to me why the setup was changed after that.

 

Totally arse about face.

Edited by NotTheMarketLeader
  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
On 3/22/2018 at 02:17, themightyfin said:

Maybe just maybe City made it clear to Drag that they fully intend to sign him close season if he’s committed.

Drags response was he wanted to keep his options open and see what offers are on the table.

City saw this as a sign of a player who could not give 100% commitment and was one of the reasons Morgan was brought back in when fit. 

Maybe CP is not the bad guy in this after all as things have to be right for all concerned.

Just saying.......

Not 100% committed??? He is apparently and understandably (in my opinion) keeping his options open as he does not want to waste anymore time being stuck behind Morgan, regardless of performances.  If he does go, our loss.

Nigel Graham Pearson

Nigel Graham Pearson

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mozartfox said:

Not 100% committed??? He is apparently and understandably (in my opinion) keeping his options open as he does not want to waste anymore time being stuck behind Morgan, regardless of performances.  If he does go, our loss.

Dragovic has every right to keep his cards close to his chest until the club stick a reasonable contract under his nose. Negotiating, especially in this age, is a two way street, not ‘we’re not giving you a contract yet but we’re going to judge you if you’re not fully committed right now’.

 

The club aren’t that daft so it’s likely bs. 

  • Like 1
themightyfin

themightyfin

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, mozartfox said:

Not 100% committed??? He is apparently and understandably (in my opinion) keeping his options open as he does not want to waste anymore time being stuck behind Morgan, regardless of performances.  If he does go, our loss.

Read my post again. He was only took out of the team after saying he wanted to look at his options and not commit. 

ZeGuy

ZeGuy

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, themightyfin said:

Read my post again. He was only took out of the team after saying he wanted to look at his options and not commit. 

Nah, he was taken out as soon as Morgan was fit again.

Edited by ZeGuy
  • Like 2
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, themightyfin said:

Read my post again. He was only took out of the team after saying he wanted to look at his options and not commit. 

Who actually told you this?  Was it Puel or Dragovic?

mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, ZeGuy said:

Nah, he was taken out as soon as Morgan was fit again.

This!

  • Like 1
sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, ZeGuy said:

Nah, he was taken out as soon as Morgan was fit again.

 

5 hours ago, mozartfox said:

Who actually told you this?  Was it Puel or Dragovic?


Funny I've been told the same story. He was dropped because he would not commit to the club.

 

HighPeakFox

HighPeakFox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, sylofox said:

 


Funny I've been told the same story. He was dropped because he would not commit to the club.

 

It may be true, but stories propagate a lot in this world, people talk a lot of speculative bollocks. What someone said, even if they're close to the club, still might just be their projection rather than factual.

norwichfox

norwichfox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, sylofox said:

 


Funny I've been told the same story. He was dropped because he would not commit to the club.

 

We only want players who have been committed.....:whistle:

sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, HighPeakFox said:

It may be true, but stories propagate a lot in this world, people talk a lot of speculative bollocks. What someone said, even if they're close to the club, still might just be their projection rather than factual.

Agreed but this has come from two different sources. Both of which have given reliable info in the past.

  • Haha 1
HighPeakFox

HighPeakFox

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, sylofox said:

Agreed but this has come from two different sources. Both of which have given reliable info in the past.

It may be true, as I said. I certainly wasn't having a go at you, for the record.

sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, HighPeakFox said:

. I certainly wasn't having a go at you, for the record.

I didn't take it as you was or that you had written the point off. My comments were more to the replies writing fins comment off.

HighPeakFox

HighPeakFox

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, sylofox said:

I didn't take it as you was or that you had written the point off. My comments were more to the replies writing fins comment off.

Understood. In these difficult times, avoiding misunderstanding (especially amongst friends) feels important.

  • Haha 1
sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, HighPeakFox said:

Understood. In these difficult times, avoiding misunderstanding (especially amongst friends) feels important.

lollollollol By difficult times I take it you mean the international break lollollol 

1972 Fox

1972 Fox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, sylofox said:

lollollollol By difficult times I take it you mean the international break lollollol 

Poor emoji symmetry. You'd have been better off going for 4 + 4. :)

sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Blue Fox 72 said:

Poor emoji symmetry. You'd have been better off going for 4 + 4. :)

lollollol I think your confusing me with someone who gives a fvck lollollollol 

  • Haha 2
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...