Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Inevitable. Stokes will probably smash 200 now and everything will be justified but I don't think you can ever have success long term without a reliable top 4. 

 

Top order batting in test cricket is the hardest aspect of the game, in bowler friendly conditions but you still have to be better in defence. Pope somehow gets runs despite looking like he can get out at any point. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

:dunno: The new coaching and attitude resulted in this team chasing down four 250+ targets, one being the largest in England history made to look like a walk in the park and another with 22 overs to spare when only 72 were available to begin with, after a horrendous losing streak stretching back quite a while.

 

Speaking personally I'm perfectly happy with "Bazball" at the present time (or more accurately the mentality driving it) even if it does go horribly Pete Tong in this particular match.

 

 

Edited by leicsmac
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

:dunno: The new coaching and attitude resulted in this team chasing down four 250+ targets, one being the largest in England history made to look like a walk in the park and another with 22 overs to spare when only 72 were available to begin with, after a horrendous losing streak stretching back quite a while.

 

Speaking personally I'm perfectly happy with "Bazball" at the present time (or more accurately the mentality driving it) even if it does go horribly Pete Tong in this particular match.

 

 

Yeah I get that . It made for thrilling cricket and I won’t give up on it yet but it probably needs to be tempered with some pragmatism. SAfrica’s attack is a lot better than NZ but their batting is pretty average and if England could keep their best pacemen fit for more than one match at a time I would expect to see us come back strongly away from Lords where most oppo sides find inspiration and SA had overwhelmingly the best conditions when they bowled and batted 

 

Crawley has to go though . Just not doing it at the moment or earlier in the Summer at any level 

Edited by surrifox
Posted
2 minutes ago, surrifox said:

Yeah I get that . It made for thrilling cricket and I won’t give up on it yet but it probably needs to be tempered with some pragmatism. SAfrica’s attack is a lot better than NZ but their batting is pretty average and if England could keep their best pacemen fit for more than one match at a time I would expect to see us come back strongly away from Lords where most oppo sides find inspiration and SA had overwhelmingly the best conditions when they bowled and batted 

It being tempered with pragmatism is how we get the safe losing England team of the past couple of years imo. Fair points on the Saffers and the England bowlers being horrific with fitness though.

Posted

Emphatic victory for SA. 

 

They're underestimated. Their bowling attack has so much depth and potential. Jansen, Rabada, Ngidi, Nortje all under 30 so have plenty of years left in them. Phelukwayo and Olivier not even in this line-up and they're 30 or under. 

 

Seems like they've gone through their own transition period, or just about to end it. And should now need to be taken seriously.

Posted
54 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Emphatic victory for SA. 

 

They're underestimated. Their bowling attack has so much depth and potential. Jansen, Rabada, Ngidi, Nortje all under 30 so have plenty of years left in them. Phelukwayo and Olivier not even in this line-up and they're 30 or under. 

 

Seems like they've gone through their own transition period, or just about to end it. And should now need to be taken seriously.

Said back on the West Indies tour Rabada, Jansen and Ngidi would run through this lot. Still think their batting line up isn't quite as good as it has been but bowling is superb.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...