Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Trelleh

EFL Officiating Abomination Journal 23/24

By Trelleh, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Les-TA-Jon

Les-TA-Jon

Posted
Posted

1st goal was clearly onside. 
Don’t know where all these pen/handball claims are coming from. 
What/where are the red cards people are claiming? 
 

the things he did get wrong were: not enough yellows for Boro, not enough time added on at the end. 

  • Like 1
The Doctor

The Doctor

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

1st goal was clearly onside. 
Don’t know where all these pen/handball claims are coming from. 
What/where are the red cards people are claiming? 
 

the things he did get wrong were: not enough yellows for Boro, not enough time added on at the end. 

Clarke chopping down Ricardo, getting booked, then doing the exact same, right down to the blade of grass it was on, on Praet 15 minutes later. Clarke was also the one who basically caught it to take it away from McAteer when we were chasing a first goal 

  • Like 1
Bordersfox

Bordersfox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, The Doctor said:

Clarke chopping down Ricardo, getting booked, then doing the exact same, right down to the blade of grass it was on, on Praet 15 minutes later. Clarke was also the one who basically caught it to take it away from McAteer when we were chasing a first goal 

It wasn't Clarke who got booked in the first half apparently. Comms made a mistake.    

Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

1st goal was clearly onside. 
Don’t know where all these pen/handball claims are coming from. 
What/where are the red cards people are claiming? 
 

the things he did get wrong were: not enough yellows for Boro, not enough time added on at the end. 

Second half. The ball has bounced and hit their 5’s hand. It’s a penalty. I was right in line with it. The red card. Same suspect. Booked in the first 5 minutes. Then not booked ten minutes later for the exact same foul. 

  • Like 1
Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bordersfox said:

It wasn't Clarke who got booked in the first half apparently. Comms made a mistake.    

It was. 

  • Like 1
The Doctor

The Doctor

Posted
Posted
Just now, Bordersfox said:

Well comms have definitely made a mistake then, but now I'm not sure where exactly 😂

In saying it wasn't, it absolutely was Clarke who got booked for the foul on Ricardo 

Les-TA-Jon

Les-TA-Jon

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bert said:

Second half. The ball has bounced and hit their 5’s hand. It’s a penalty. I was right in line with it. The red card. Same suspect. Booked in the first 5 minutes. Then not booked ten minutes later for the exact same foul. 

Maybe it was a different incident but with the benefit of replays it never hit his hand

The Doctor

The Doctor

Posted
Posted
Just now, Les-TA-Jon said:

Maybe it was a different incident but with the benefit of replays it never hit his hand

Definitely a different incident, because it does hit his hand in the one Bert is mentioning 

Bordersfox

Bordersfox

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, The Doctor said:

In saying it wasn't, it absolutely was Clarke who got booked for the foul on Ricardo 

Ah fair enough.  They claimed it was Engel at the start of the first half not Clarke and that they'd got it wrong.  

LCFC-92

LCFC-92

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Bert said:

Second half. The ball has bounced and hit their 5’s hand. It’s a penalty. I was right in line with it. The red card. Same suspect. Booked in the first 5 minutes. Then not booked ten minutes later for the exact same foul. 

Those bouncing onto someone's hand penalties are only ever really given after a VAR review.

 

Referee wasn't brilliant but in no way responsible for that shower we've just presented.

The Doctor

The Doctor

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LCFC-92 said:

Those bouncing onto someone's hand penalties are only ever really given after a VAR review.

 

Referee wasn't brilliant but in no way responsible for that shower we've just presented.

So, referees aren't competent enough to give decisions correctly without help then? Not like it was from a corner with a blocked sight line, it was out towards the side of the box

UniFox21

UniFox21

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

No. It was another player who neither scored or assisted

The fact he wasn't involved in the goal is irrelevant? If Kasey headbutts their defender at the before Vardy scores, goal would be ruled out. 

 

JJ's tripped and good chance he makes it back to defend the goal. 

 

 

Edited by UniFox21
  • Like 1
Nod.E

Nod.E

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Bert said:

He was woeful. Unsurprisingly. Arrogant as usual. How their centre half didn’t get sent off after being booked for the same tackle he actually got booked for was a shambles. Missed a hand ball in the second half which should’ve been a pen. Then to only add on 4 minutes. After 8 subs and countless time wasting. Embarassing. He hates us. Always has 

Wasn't hand ball.

 

Still a sh!te ref though.

phoneticerror

phoneticerror

Posted
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

1st goal was clearly onside. 
Don’t know where all these pen/handball claims are coming from. 
What/where are the red cards people are claiming? 
 

the things he did get wrong were: not enough yellows for Boro, not enough time added on at the end. 

 

3 minutes ago, Nod.E said:

Wasn't hand ball.

 

Still a sh!te ref though.

Looked like a hand ball from SK4. Haven’t watched back though on tv

Edited by phoneticerror
KFS

KFS

Posted
Posted

Kavanaugh is terrible. Spent the second half pointing out to my little boy that he’s the reason he should want to brush his teeth. Imagine getting a yellow card off that stinky mouth. Gross

The Doctor

The Doctor

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Nod.E said:

Wasn't hand ball.

 

Still a sh!te ref though.

His arm was outside of his silhouette and moved towards the ball, nearest player was McAteer like two yards away, not sure how you can claim it's not handball when it's not accidental and hits his hand

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...