Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, SK3Blue said:

Awaiting picture of Russell Martin flanked by Ayew and Thomas circle jerk photoshoot….

Fixed it for you

Posted
6 minutes ago, Tommy Fresh said:

Sean Dyche who went in at Forest and hasn't improved anything lol

So who would you have that would actually come here? 
Yes he has failed at Forest Martin O’Neill failed at Shepshed charterhouse. Ranieri failed at most of his clubs. Pearson as not been a success since leaving here. 
we need someone who would actually help us get out of this situ. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Most managers would be absolutely mad to take this job at the moment. Even Michael Skubala, who seems to be the outstanding candidate in my eyes, wouldn’t leave Lincoln to coach us.
 

The fact we can’t realistically attract the Lincoln City manager is unbelievably damming. They have a bigger budget for new players than us, and can’t lose a game, and they’ve barely got 4 stands round the pitch!

Edited by mattlcfc15
  • Like 1
Posted

as soon as dyche got sacked just knew some fans would want him

its like water is wet

would be another failure from the club if they got him in

and hopefully they dont

Posted

Genuinely astounded how many people think Dyche would come here. Maybe this explains why Aiyawatt gets off with it - fanbase haven't quite yet appreciated what he's done to us.

  • Like 2
Posted

It comes to a point now, where you would envisage these managers are sort of hoping and angling for the sack when things get tough. Certainly in the top flight where they bounce from job to job. It’s like winning the lottery for them.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said:

 

Erm, he's got the highest win % of any manager under Marinakis and say what you want about him to say he hasn't improved anything on Ange Postacoglou is just fundamentally incorrect lol 

 

Despite their recent form it's a harsh sacking to me and one they may well pay for. 

 

1 minute ago, st albans fox said:

Best win rate percentage of recent times (including nuno) 

He's got a lower points per game record then Nuno and Steve Cooper at Forest, which I'd argue is more important than win percentage. But if you want to talk about win percentages he has one of the worst of recent managers at Everton.

 

Perhaps worded it wrong about it not improving since Ange, but there's no way Dyche was hired with the squad they have for them to be happy with 17th and looking over their shoulders as West Ham find form. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, CrazyKopCorner said:

I think we've sunk too low for Dyche but he may feel he can get us back as Market Leaders. 

 

It depends on the size of the mans ego and how much bluff and shite we can give him 

Was just rumoured to be on £3.9m a season, even a 50% cut would put him out of our reach 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, TheGoldenGod said:

I agree with some on here. The lack of urgency is infuriating me. A club that feels the actual weight of the situation would already have someone appointed...get in Rowatt!

Have you considered the possibility that the state of affairs explored in the 'Where's the money gone?' thread is well known within football and that nobody worth their salt will touch us with a bargepole? 

Posted
7 minutes ago, FrankieADZ said:

as soon as dyche got sacked just knew some fans would want him

its like water is wet

would be another failure from the club if they got him in

and hopefully they dont

 

It really wouldn't lol 

 

Although you have nothing to worry about he aint coming here. 

Posted
Just now, ClaphamFox said:

Have you considered the possibility that the state of affairs explored in the 'Where's the money gone?' thread is well known within football and that nobody worth their salt will touch us with a bargepole? 

Not really looked at the thread fella. Acceptance from the club and yourself then to not even bother trying to appoint anyone!

Posted
Just now, TheGoldenGod said:

Not really looked at the thread fella. Acceptance from the club and yourself then to not even bother trying to appoint anyone!

You've missed the point entirely. I think it's possible that they are trying to appoint somebody but are being turned down flat by everybody they approach. The problem may not be a lack or urgency, but rather that we are so unattractive that we just can't find anybody to do it.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

You've missed the point entirely. I think it's possible that they are trying to appoint somebody but are being turned down flat by everybody they approach. The problem may not be a lack or urgency, but rather that we are so unattractive that we just can't find anybody to do it.

I'm fully aware of our position and the attractiveness of the role right now. All I said was go and get Rowatt. If you think there's no possibility that they are just really slow..then not sure what to say because we've got that type of inept leadership and has been the reason we are where we are!

Edited by TheGoldenGod
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tommy Fresh said:

 

He's got a lower points per game record then Nuno and Steve Cooper at Forest, which I'd argue is more important than win percentage. But if you want to talk about win percentages he has one of the worst of recent managers at Everton.

 

Perhaps worded it wrong about it not improving since Ange, but there's no way Dyche was hired with the squad they have for them to be happy with 17th and looking over their shoulders as West Ham find form. 

 

Well for one we weren't talking about Everton were we, you were saying he hasn't improved anything at Forest which is complete nonsense never mind wrong.

 

I also don't know how you've calculated that but Nuno qualified for Europe and Cooper had them in the Championship so if that's taken into account, not exactly surprising. 

 

The fact they are 17th and looking back at West Ham (a situation they've funnily engineered themselves by giving them access to Nuno) with the squad they have is exactly why he's been sacked but then I think the club themselves need to get a bit real and look at what they've done themselves to disrupt the playing staff at that club and just be happy they got someone there who managed to dig them out of the bottom three in the first place. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said:

 

Well for one we weren't talking about Everton were we, you were saying he hasn't improved anything at Forest which is complete nonsense never mind wrong.

 

I also don't know how you've calculated that but Nuno qualified for Europe and Cooper had them in the Championship so if that's taken into account, not exactly surprising. 

 

The fact they are 17th and looking back at West Ham (a situation they've funnily engineered themselves by giving them access to Nuno) with the squad they have is exactly why he's been sacked but then I think the club themselves need to get a bit real and look at what they've done themselves to disrupt the playing staff at that club and just be happy they got someone there who managed to dig them out of the bottom three in the first place. 

 

 

Firsly I've said I'd perhaps worded it wrong about it not improving since Ange, so calm down a little bit brother, but it's fair to look at Everton, becahse you wouldn't appoint a manager based on one job would you.

 

You mentioned win rates of managers under Marinakis as a point to back him up, so it's pretty fair we look at points per game as well.

 

 

Edited by Tommy Fresh
Posted
5 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

You've missed the point entirely. I think it's possible that they are trying to appoint somebody but are being turned down flat by everybody they approach. The problem may not be a lack or urgency, but rather that we are so unattractive that we just can't find anybody to do it.

Imagine what Rowett said that we’re after an ambitious manager, as this could possibly have been from the feedback via his agent. That would tell you everything , zero fxking pragmatism and delusion that the tw@ts are looking at managers that they think they can still attract and blissfully ignorant of why those managers would never say yes, they’re likely wasting their time, they’re just inept. 
 

I’d imagine they’re still aiming to go for some kind of possession based obsessed manager, a system that isn’t working and won’t keep us in the league. 
 

They may be getting turned down but that’s because they’re likely unrealistically asking the wrong people.

Posted
6 hours ago, Roosters boots said:

I’d take Dyche, can’t deny his ability to keep teams up, which we need right now, then get some momentum going for next season. People say he’s boring football but Forest had 31 shots last night. Obviously close for him to travel and I think he’s the kind of person we need right now. 

We need some boring football at the back. I'm sick of the pants-shitting kind.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Tommy Fresh said:

You mentioned win rates of managers under Marinakis as a point to back him up, so it's pretty fair we look at points per game as well. It's also fair to look at Everton, because you wouldn't appoint a manager based on just one job would you.

 

 

 

Relevant to him not improving Forest yes? Everton, nothing to do with it.

 

We can look at points per games all day long, do you want to look at his predecessor? 

 

We aren't appointing him anyway, it's got nothing to do with him being the next Leicester manager as that is not going to happen however much we talk about it. 

 

But like I say you're still classifying failure as not meeting a points per game achieved in qualifying for Europe during the best season they've had in decades, and points gained in the Championship which is a completely incomparable matrix.

Edited by Manwell Pablo
Posted
Just now, Lesta Legend said:

 

I’d imagine they’re still aiming to go for some kind of possession based obsessed manager, a system that isn’t working and won’t keep us in the league. 

Top did acknowledge in his interview that the paradigm has changed, but then also made a worrying comment about when everything's sorted out people 'will understand why we play the way we play'

Posted
Just now, Manwell Pablo said:

 

Relevant to him not improving Forest yes? Everton, nothing to do with it.

 

We can look at points per games all day long, do you want to look at his predecessor? 

Yeah and I'd said I'd probably worded that wrong so chill out a little bit man lol Yeah but who mentioned best win ratio of any manager under Marinakis that wasn't just Ange was it, hence why I've pointed out him being lower than others on points per game

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...