Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, HankMarvin said:

I dunno, they must be kinda hoping the Bosnian hits the ground running. Not exactly thriving with great options if he ends up being shit or injured. BCR 🤢

No, but they have a better idea if Soutter and Faes are leaving.

 

Hutchinson can cover at striker, it's an easier position for a kid to cover than CB.

 

I think we will end up with a CB perm, CB and CF on loan. 

 

Think it all hinges on what happens on the outs. 

Posted
Just now, Foxmeister said:

I’m not at all certain Faes leaves, can’t wait to see him sulk around until January at least.

Pretty certain he gone by the close of the window.

Posted

Lot less time in the window than people appreciate. I'd say it's nearly certain at this point we leave ourselves short - again.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Dan said:

Lot less time in the window than people appreciate. I'd say it's nearly certain at this point we leave ourselves short - again.

11 days to go, plenty of time to still do business.

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted
1 hour ago, Dan said:

Lot less time in the window than people appreciate. I'd say it's nearly certain at this point we leave ourselves short - again.

Arrivals might be contingent on departures.

Posted
2 hours ago, Dan said:

Lot less time in the window than people appreciate. I'd say it's nearly certain at this point we leave ourselves short - again.

To be fair last summer we got quite a lot of ins and outs in the last 10-14 days.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, HankMarvin said:

I dunno, they must be kinda hoping the Bosnian hits the ground running. Not exactly thriving with great options if he ends up being shit or injured. BCR 🤢

Martin has no intention of playing Bristric. Our striking duo will be Cullen and BDR, he’s made that pretty clear. Bristric will be the back up option. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

Martin has no intention of playing Bristric. Our striking duo will be Cullen and BDR, he’s made that pretty clear. Bristric will be the back up option. 

Cullens record as a CF is pretty wank in the champ one goal every 5 

 

 

 

Posted
Just now, HankMarvin said:

Cullens record as a CF is pretty wank in the champ one goal every 5 

 

 

 

Yep. Which is why in my opinion Martin is on a hiding to nothing. This is how he wants to play, so we will continue to see what we saw against Notts, it was a mistake hiring him, because of things like this…. Neither Cullen or BDR will score goals. 

  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

Martin has no intention of playing Bristric. Our striking duo will be Cullen and BDR, he’s made that pretty clear. Bristric will be the back up option. 

How has he made that clear?

Posted

As others have said, I’m assuming we need to shift a defender or two before we bring anyone in.

 

its going to be one of the horrible end of the windows where nothing happens until the last day or so

Posted
26 minutes ago, Finn Claw II said:

As others have said, I’m assuming we need to shift a defender or two before we bring anyone in.

 

its going to be one of the horrible end of the windows where nothing happens until the last day or so

That’s the problem when the buying club hold all the aces. Everyone knows we need to sell.

Posted
5 hours ago, Gazza M said:

Looking at a couple of perm CB signings according to today's press conference. That screams free transfer for an older player again to me. 

Surely the only Prem defenders that drop 2 divisions are youth players in search of gametime.

Posted

Surprised no one has suggested Adam Webster.

 

Done his ACL within the last 12 months ✅
Free transfer ✅

Lives on the South coast, so could go for a nice little coffee with Russell ✅

 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, JimJams said:

Surely the only Prem defenders that drop 2 divisions are youth players in search of gametime.

Martin dismissed that type of player in the interview. Any Ipswich cast offs again? 

Posted
8 hours ago, ClaphamFox said:

How has he made that clear?

When he said the last time Bobby was in the division he got 20 goals. It’s clear to me this is what he wants to do, so unless they’re all injured the combination is likely to be Chaplin / Cullen and BDR depending on who’s available. I don’t think we will see Britric feature unless it’s from the bench or due to injury. Because of the way Russel wants to play. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Pliskin said:

When he said the last time Bobby was in the division he got 20 goals. It’s clear to me this is what he wants to do, so unless they’re all injured the combination is likely to be Chaplin / Cullen and BDR depending on who’s available. I don’t think we will see Britric feature unless it’s from the bench or due to injury. Because of the way Russel wants to play. 

I can’t find the quote you’re referring to, but if he said that he’s been misinformed—BDR has never scored anywhere near 20 goals in League One, though he did once score 19 in the Championship. Whatever he said, I think you’re reading way too much into it. If a journalist asks Martin about his striking options, he’s hardly likely to talk down BDR in public—of course he’ll praise him. That doesn’t mean he’s his first choice for that position.

 

Martin has always favoured recognisable strikers (Will Grigg at MK Dons, Adsm Armstrong and Che Adams at Southampton). BDR has never been a traditional striker despite that one season in the  Championship with Bristol City nine years ago. Martin has played him so far because he hasn’t had much option. When Bristric is ready, he’ll be our CF unless we bring in another striker who’s even better. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

To be fair last summer we got quite a lot of ins and outs in the last 10-14 days.

Yes i agree but there was lots of noise, speculation, and twitter chat. 

There is literally nothing.. not even the obvious Agent propaganda...which speaks volumes .....or not 

Edited by Headcase
Posted
3 hours ago, SafewayFox said:

Surprised no one has suggested Adam Webster.

 

Done his ACL within the last 12 months ✅
Free transfer ✅

Lives on the South coast, so could go for a nice little coffee with Russell ✅

 

Torn ACL you say? Come on down!!!

 

He's a solid player tbf we could get worse than this.

We do need some pace at the back though

Posted
2 hours ago, Pliskin said:

When he said the last time Bobby was in the division he got 20 goals. It’s clear to me this is what he wants to do, so unless they’re all injured the combination is likely to be Chaplin / Cullen and BDR depending on who’s available. I don’t think we will see Britric feature unless it’s from the bench or due to injury. Because of the way Russel wants to play. 

Anothet day, another way of trying to twist something in to a negative.

 

Most be so tiring.

 

Britric will feature, and so will the other CF we bring in.......

Posted
36 minutes ago, Headcase said:

Yes i agree but there was lots of noise, speculation, and twitter chat. 

There is literally nothing.. not even the obvious Agent propaganda...which speaks volumes .....or not 

There was none when we signed Howell.

  • Like 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Anothet day, another way of trying to twist something in to a negative.

 

Most be so tiring.

 

Britric will feature, and so will the other CF we bring in.......

It’s not really twisting… there’s zero evidence that Martin plans to use Bristric, yet he’s repeatedly stated that he is happy with what he has from an attacking point of view.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...