stevefox Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 Hey all , i was just flicking channels and sky sports news have confirmed we have had a approach to take ruffus on loan for one month declined!
Mark Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 http://www.pafc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/...0.html?ptvParm=
Matt Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 http://www.pafc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/...0.html?ptvParm= Server ErrorThis server has encountered an internal error which prevents it from fulfilling your request. The most likely cause is a misconfiguration. Please ask the administrator to look for messages in the server's error log.
Syko Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 that seems a bit harsh! we only want to see what he's like and he won't let us have him
Head Honcho Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 Why on earth we'd want to sign a player whose only played 40 games in 3 years is beyond me and he's from Derby .............and he was sent off for West Ham against? Thats right us!
City Fan Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 Foxes DeniedRUFUS Brevett will not be joining Leicester City on loan. The Foxes offered to take Brevett to the Walkers Stadium on a one-month loan deal Despite stating that Brevett is unlikely to feature in the first team this season, Pulis was unwilling to release Brevett for just one month "Leicester rung up and wanted to take Rufus for a month," said Pulis. "A month is no good for me or the club, if they want Rufus they should take him for the rest of the season." The veteran left-back has also been linked to Doncaster Rovers in recent weeks.
Knighton Matt Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 Nice to see we're still competing with the big guns in the transfer market!!! Donny Rovers???!!!!
Scow Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 I can see why Kelly would go for him - he would provide some experience in the backline and is a natural left back. Saying that, he's been woeful for a while.
davieG Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 Hopefully Kelly plans to use Sheehan either as back up or in place of Nissa, especially if some bookings come along. As Sheehan's injured it's logical to get someone just for a month until Sheehan's fit again. Well that's how I see this approach.
Knighton Matt Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 I can see why Kelly would go for him - he would provide some experience in the backline and is a natural left back. Saying that, he's been woeful for a while. By that description you could be describing Alan Rogers which makes me glad it's not gone through!
City Fan Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 Rufus Brevett? Jesus christ Kelly, I've always thought you shared a striking resemblence facial wise to Micky Adams, but I didn't realise you're transfer dealings would also share the same resemblence!
Knighton Matt Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 Rufus Brevett? Jesus christ Kelly, I've always thought you shared a striking resemblence facial wise to Micky Adams, but I didn't realise you're transfer dealings would also share the same resemblence! Or just Rob to his friends....
Scow Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 By that description you could be describing Alan Rogers which makes me glad it's not gone through! I think I'd prefer Johansson at left back anyway - he seems to be settling in to that position now.
Knighton Matt Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 is dennis irwin still playing? :laugh: post of the year!
The Reverend Posted 16 February 2006 Posted 16 February 2006 :laugh: post of the year! He's a little arsehole anyway so i'm glad tbh.
Hullfox Posted 17 February 2006 Posted 17 February 2006 I think I'd prefer Johansson at left back anyway - he seems to be settling in to that position now. A lot of that is because he hasn't been left exposed by Smith lately.
Manwell Pablo Posted 17 February 2006 Posted 17 February 2006 A lot of that is because he hasn't been left exposed by Smith lately. uuhhhhhh Controversial. Thers a mob outside my house lighting torches and they just started marching towards Hull .
Ric Flair Posted 17 February 2006 Posted 17 February 2006 Thank **** for that. Abit similar to when Adams failed in signing Jason McAteer and Warren Barton, blessing in disguise big time.
ithuriel Posted 17 February 2006 Posted 17 February 2006 i think kelly just wanted someone experienced as back-up to the leftback spot just in case. the squad is a little stretched in some areas at present and im guessing there arent a lot of leftbacks who are available to loan at present.
Ricey Posted 17 February 2006 Posted 17 February 2006 I wouldn't mind Brevett as back-up while Sheehan is injured but there's no way he is better than Nissa or Sheehan. Like Scowy, I think Johansson is finally settling at left back and improving with every game.
Hullfox Posted 17 February 2006 Posted 17 February 2006 uuhhhhhh Controversial. Thers a mob outside my house lighting torches and they just started marching towards Hull . They'll need em, there's no leccy up here.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.