Wycombe Fox Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Don't feel to enthused about it all after tonight, I think he will probabley buy Wednesday. That'd be OK. Then on Thursday he might like to strengthen the squad and on Friday he could take the day off before his first match as owner of LCFC against Birmingham.
De Vries The King Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Please, please, please let it happen and get us out of this ****hole we're in.
lcfc_jme Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 I can honestly say that I'd love to see this happen for us. We need to pay off all of our debts, turn a corner and start making money. I used to be sceptical of any sort of takeover, but we need something drastic to happen, something to breathe a new lease of life into our club, something that'll make the players believe they have reason to perform and something to give them fresh confidence.
Swedging Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Ok own up who else has voted no? You're totally messing up the figures now 'Twas me. I think Mandaric's success with Portsmouth needs some careful looking at. Basically, his first success came with Portsmouth's promotion. The money invested wasn't massive - around £5 million - and was more to do with getting Redknapp in. He then drove Redknapp out and in due course, everything went to sh*t. Second success: Portsmouth have stayed up. 3 mighty flukes - but most of all last season. Which revolves around three things: a mighty slice of luck, getting Redknapp in and getting Gaydermak to finance the rebuilding of the squad (because, by some accounts, MM couldn't afford to do so). Without which Portsmouth would be just another Wolves, Leeds, Leicester or West Brom. Now I can take believing that he'll bring luck and Redknapp here. That's fine - but probably implausible. But Gaydermak is truly fecking dirty money and you have to wonder, next time he sells out, how low can he go? Success for the team is not, for me, at the expense of all integrity. I try and refuse such corruption when I work - why should I accept it in my leisure time?
Manwell Pablo Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 'Twas me. I think Mandaric's success with Portsmouth needs some careful looking at. Basically, his first success came with Portsmouth's promotion. The money invested wasn't massive - around £5 million - and was more to do with getting Redknapp in. He then drove Redknapp out and in due course, everything went to sh*t. Second success: Portsmouth have stayed up. 3 mighty flukes - but most of all last season. Which revolves around three things: a mighty slice of luck, getting Redknapp in and getting Gaydermak to finance the rebuilding of the squad (because, by some accounts, MM couldn't afford to do so). Without which Portsmouth would be just another Wolves, Leeds, Leicester or West Brom. Now I can take believing that he'll bring luck and Redknapp here. That's fine - but probably implausible. But Gaydermak is truly fecking dirty money and you have to wonder, next time he sells out, how low can he go? Success for the team is not, for me, at the expense of all integrity. I try and refuse such corruption when I work - why should I accept it in my leisure time? Well put arguement. Problem being that we're not really in a postion to be picky about who puts their money into this club.
Ultra Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 'Twas me. I think Mandaric's success with Portsmouth needs some careful looking at. Basically, his first success came with Portsmouth's promotion. The money invested wasn't massive - around £5 million - and was more to do with getting Redknapp in. He then drove Redknapp out and in due course, everything went to sh*t. It also had a lot to do with the fact that the collapse of ITV Digital meant that nobody else in the league had any money to spend that year. Second success: Portsmouth have stayed up. 3 mighty flukes - but most of all last season. Which revolves around three things: a mighty slice of luck, getting Redknapp in and getting Gaydermak to finance the rebuilding of the squad (because, by some accounts, MM couldn't afford to do so). Without which Portsmouth would be just another Wolves, Leeds, Leicester or West Brom.Now I can take believing that he'll bring luck and Redknapp here. That's fine - but probably implausible. But Gaydermak is truly fecking dirty money and you have to wonder, next time he sells out, how low can he go? Success for the team is not, for me, at the expense of all integrity. I try and refuse such corruption when I work - why should I accept it in my leisure time? Indeed. The poll results suggest we have 100+ sleazebags following our club. I have nothing but contempt for them. I cannot accept they are true FOXES.
BartonFox Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 Right bollox to this, I can't be arsed to read any further to find out if someone has answered you. Where the hell were you last week? Portsmouth were one of the clubs featured in the bungs scandal. Until the allegations have been cleared up we shouldn't be going anywhere near any of the personnel involved. Yes Kevin Bond and Harry Redknapp and yet it proved nothing, whether you or I hoped it would it didn't. A lot of clubs have come close to bankruptcy because they fell victim to predators and spivs who promised them the earth but delivered nothing. Yet he came in and saved Portsmouth and taken them to heights they haven't seen since before World War II. Why would we possibly want that? I don't think Steve Claridge or Alan Birchenall would agree, and I trust THEIR record in football far more than I do Mandaric's. Oh please are you serious? Steve Claridge the man who has gambled away over half a million and has a managerial record to laugh at. I think Claridge is great, but to class him as a serious authority on the business of football is laughable. As for that grade A mongoose that is Alan Birchenall his opinions are about as valid as a 3 pound note. The fact that MM wasn't taken in by that gimp says a lot about him, but even more about you. If we fell into financial trouble again the league would make damn sure that we'd never escape. Can we really trust Mandaric not to leave us in the lurch? Well when he left Pompey he had sold them to someone richer than him, what more could you ask? If Portsmouth are REALLY that great, ask yourself why Mandaric wants to leave. Have you never fancied a new challenge and despite our current prediciment I would still wager we are a better prospect to develop than Pompey.
Louise Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 He hasn't ruled it out, he's also been linked with Wolves. Louise has a formula for working out the likely hood of it actually happening Thanks for reminding me. I did go a bit mad back then.
BartonFox Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 Indeed. The poll results suggest we have 100+ sleazebags following our club. I have nothing but contempt for them. I cannot accept they are true FOXES. Trust me the feeling is mutual.
Manwell Pablo Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 It also had a lot to do with the fact that the collapse of ITV Digital meant that nobody else in the league had any money to spend that year. Indeed. The poll results suggest we have 100+ sleazebags following our club. I have nothing but contempt for them. I cannot accept they are true FOXES. What corruption Ultra. There is no corruption, he has never ever been involved in any kind of corruption, if you ask me your just attention seeking.
Daggers Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 Trust me the feeling is mutual. What corruption Ultra. There is no corruption, he has never ever been involved in any kind of corruption, if you ask me your just attention seeking.
Strokes Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 Indeed. The poll results suggest we have 100+ sleazebags following our club. I have nothing but contempt for them. I cannot accept they are true FOXES. You really are pathetic, it says alot more about you than it does anyone else.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 26 September 2006 Author Posted 26 September 2006 Indeed. The poll results suggest we have 100+ sleazebags following our club. I have nothing but contempt for them. I cannot accept they are true FOXES. This is my favourite yet. You have pure contempt for 96% of our fanbase?
Manwell Pablo Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 This is my favourite yet. You have pure contempt for 96% of our fanbase? I know, just for wanting something better.
The People's Hero Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 Brilliant! Ultra has lost the plot. Oh and just to disarm you Ultra, I'm expecting the old pot/kettle/black routine.
Master Fox Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 It also had a lot to do with the fact that the collapse of ITV Digital meant that nobody else in the league had any money to spend that year. Indeed. The poll results suggest we have 100+ sleazebags following our club. I have nothing but contempt for them. I cannot accept they are true FOXES. Moron
Maybes Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 Just becuase we want something better for the club doesnt make us non true foxes. Put it this way your out numbered.
Suffolk_fox Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 It also had a lot to do with the fact that the collapse of ITV Digital meant that nobody else in the league had any money to spend that year. Indeed. The poll results suggest we have 100+ sleazebags following our club. I have nothing but contempt for them. I cannot accept they are true FOXES. FOXESTALK Posting Guidelines< BIG RULES: Things deemed to be totally unacceptable: Pornographic material Spam/Commercial advertising Overt personal abuse of other posters (unless it's in jest of course!) Registering and using duplicate accounts whilst banned. What to expect in terms of moderation: If you ignore any of the BIG RULES, you'll find yourself being moderated in one of the following ways (depending on each instance): Temporary or Full access ban. Temporary posting ban. Moderator preview (members posts will be put into a moderation queue before appearing on Foxestalk. 'No New Topics' assigned to your account. etc.. Regards, Foxestalk Admin. I for one am personally insulted by Ultra's post, and it isn't like this is the first time Ultra has insulted other posters on this forum.
Manwell Pablo Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 Just becuase we want something better for the club doesnt make us non true foxes. Put it this way your out numbered. Get it right, it's FOXES, don't ask me why. Maybe he shouts it whenever he says it in real life.
Dr The Singh Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 Ultra, i'm deeply disapointed in you, just cus majority of fans disagree with you, there is no need for the sleaze bag accusation!! I'm sure when you have calmed down, you will regret that post!!!
Daggers Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 I for one am personally insulted by Ultra's post, and it isn't like this is the first time Ultra has insulted other posters on this forum. I find his posts funny, not offensive, because it is amazing that anyone can be so at odds with the world and yet still believe they are right...a trait found in lots of boys hitting puberty I believe. Expect him to do lots of door slamming, shouting in a broken voice and develop acne too.
Thracian Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 I eventually read some more and with some remaining doubt voted with my conscience and against Mandaric. But don't feel like Ultra at all. Quite the contrary. I have 100% respect for anyone who travels to watch Leicester City play the sort of football they've been playing these recent seasons - and that goes for my harshest, most persistent critics. Furthermore if Mandaric arrived and did well I'd be pleased for him and for the club and the fact that if 96% of those fans think he should come it means they are quite possibly right and makes me even more irritated for having my doubts and my concerns about the future of our emerging young players. Anyway, whatever transpires, Manwell will doubtless remind me what a mug I was when the time comes and doubtless I'll hope he gets something wrong that I can at least chuck back at him!
Suffolk_fox Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 ...a trait found in lots of boys hitting puberty I believe. Expect him to do lots of door slamming, shouting in a broken voice and develop acne too.
Thracian Posted 26 September 2006 Posted 26 September 2006 Clueless, utterly clueless. It is our only way out. Why don't you become a spokesman for the Foxestrust Don't link me with the Foxes Trust thankyou. I just don't think he'll be the Fairy Godmother you expect. It is our only way out of what? Bankruptcy? Now who's being clueless? There are various potential ways out. Question is which way is best.
.png.0e7438f54a80a2f2566907f77fd7a32a.thumb.png.0ea5e31693d284629c473304eabd4568.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.