Fox in a Box Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 I think this player is worthy of a pat on the back.... he has helped us get 6pts in the last 2 games.
gatesheadfox Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 I think this player is worthy of a pat on the back.... he has helped us get 6pts in the last 2 games. fair shout, but after last night i think they all deserve a pat. my girlfriend even said it was a good game
City_4_Life Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 He deserves a pat on the back just for his 2 clearences yesterday.
Ric Flair Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 Getting back to his best. Form is temporary, class is permanent. He's a great prospect, i'm pleased for him.
Phube Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 Getting back to his best. Form is temporary, class is permanent. He's a great prospect, i'm pleased for him. *See below*!!!
Ultra Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 I can't remember ANYONE playing well against Colchester (except Logan, perhaps..) After last night, perhaps you might consider removing the second part of your sig, because I can tell you now it definitely isn't gonna happen!
lildave3 Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 I can't remember ANYONE playing well against Colchester (except Logan, perhaps..) After last night, perhaps you might consider removing the second part of your sig, because I can tell you now it definitely isn't gonna happen! Be honest, can you see the first part happening?
cisono Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 I think this player is worthy of a pat on the back.... he has helped us get 6pts in the last 2 games. He certainly seems to have had a good game last night! Well done Richard
Katy Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 Glad his temporary blip was indeed a temporary blip, we need all players pulling in the same direction (other cliches are available )
Ultra Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 Be honest, can you see the first part happening? It's still up for grabs, although first of all he needs to focus on keeping his place once Kenton is fit again. At the moment though, Hume probably has the edge in the race for POTS.
Bert Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 Last night it was a team effort, everyone put the effort in, clearing balls is Stearmans job (Not that it wasn't top class like) Humes job is to score goals and they did that. Not slagging any player off like, just that every deserves as much praise as the next player.
Ric Flair Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 Last night it was a team effort, everyone put the effort in, clearing balls is Stearmans job (Not that it wasn't top class like) Humes job is to score goals and they did that. Not slagging any player off like, just that every deserves as much praise as the next player. Sometimes some players deserve extra special praise, such as Hume on saturday. In your theory what happens if a defender scores or an attacker makes a good clearance? Good team effort though, proud of 'em.
Bert Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 Sometimes some players deserve extra special praise, such as Hume on saturday. In your theory what happens if a defender scores or an attacker makes a good clearance? Good team effort though, proud of 'em. Haha, yeah i see your point, but you know what i mean! (or at least i think you do )
lildave3 Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 It's still up for grabs, although first of all he needs to focus on keeping his place once Kenton is fit again. At the moment though, Hume probably has the edge in the race for POTS. McAuley, McCarthy and Logan must be up there aswell imo.
Joe. Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 It sounded like pretty much everyone had a cracking game last night... It's nice to hear that we are stringing some good results together
Matt Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 Well every game apart from the last two IMO he has been almost useless, shocking! But i'm happy to admit i've been slagging him off and now he is coming good a proving me wrong last two game without him we would have conceaded and he's kept us in the games.
Floating Fox Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 Well every game apart from the last two IMO he has been almost useless, shocking! But i'm happy to admit i've been slagging him off and now he is coming good a proving me wrong last two game without him we would have conceaded and he's kept us in the games. I slagged him off as well . At least he has shown us he CAN play well Sounds like Maybury and Syalla had decent games as well
lookwhaticando Posted 18 October 2006 Posted 18 October 2006 I slagged him off as well . At least he has shown us he CAN play well Sounds like Maybury and Syalla had decent games as well About 12 minutes of game time between them doesn't really count for much, does it?
lcfc_jme Posted 19 October 2006 Posted 19 October 2006 About 12 minutes of game time between them doesn't really count for much, does it? If it were Mattock and McAuley having 12 minutes of game time between them, would it count then?? Not just Stearman deserving a pat on the back though (even though his goal and 2 clearances have won us points), but the entire team for turning things around and picking the performances up
lookwhaticando Posted 19 October 2006 Posted 19 October 2006 If it were Mattock and McAuley having 12 minutes of game time between them, would it count then?? Not just Stearman deserving a pat on the back though (even though his goal and 2 clearances have won us points), but the entire team for turning things around and picking the performances up Let's not bring my obvious biases into this discussion. Two players with 12 minutes between them rarely make any impact at all - so even though Mattock and McAuley are two of the greatest players ever to wear the city shirt, even I would concede they didn't do much in 12 minutes.
davieG Posted 19 October 2006 Posted 19 October 2006 Let's not bring my obvious biases into this discussion. Two players with 12 minutes between them rarely make any impact at all - so even though Mattock and McAuley are two of the greatest players ever to wear the city shirt, even I would concede they didn't do much in 12 minutes. Mattock ?????
lookwhaticando Posted 19 October 2006 Posted 19 October 2006 Mattock ????? He will be. Once he's given a shirt to put on. I expect big things of the lad.
lcfc_jme Posted 19 October 2006 Posted 19 October 2006 Let's not bring my obvious biases into this discussion. Two players with 12 minutes between them rarely make any impact at all - so even though Mattock and McAuley are two of the greatest players ever to wear the city shirt, even I would concede they didn't do much in 12 minutes. I'm not so sure you mean that looky, it's a blatant lie to stop me accusing you of being over-biased I agree though - 2 players rarely make a huge difference to the tempo and tone of any game, but occasionally, and this is only very occasionly, they can completely turn a game on its head and become instant heros
ithuriel Posted 19 October 2006 Posted 19 October 2006 on central news it mentioned that villa are looking at stearman. stearman just said that he is a leicester player for the present i liked the present bit i doubt he will still be here come the end of the season.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.