Wasyls Pec Deck Posted 2 December 2006 Posted 2 December 2006 What ya reckon? Im choosing NO Whilst praying to the heavens, actually might visit a church for the first time...
lildave3 Posted 2 December 2006 Posted 2 December 2006 I think there is definately 3 worse teams in this league than us regardless of Milan. With Milan and his money i reckon we will finish about 14th/15th
Wils Posted 2 December 2006 Posted 2 December 2006 I dont think we will,but we will definatly be down there.
RowlattsFox Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 i think we'd stay up without mandaric's money. there are 3 worse teams than us.
Mikey Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 I voted NO. With or without mandaric's money I think we will stay up.
Thracian Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 If Kelly stays in charge and fails to balance the team we could well go down. Mandaric is no fool...and the potential players he wants will know what the table says too. Some might not want the risk to their careers, no matter what the wages and would MM be keen to offer reasonable contracts if we might go down? And how many players would he bring in anyway?. We certainly need four. And they will almost certainly displace fairly senior players so maintaining harmony - not necessarily Kelly's best quality from all the stories so far - won't be any easier unless the surplus is unloaded promptly. Plus, it may take time for the new players to adapt to our tactical master plan of contain and pinch one. A long time in some cases, unless the plan changes this morning and for ever. I voted No, we won't get relegated. But only on the assumption that whatever MM does, the board gets Beaglehole or someone like him in as caretaker before we dig an even bigger pit for ourselves to climb out of.
MBK Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 Depends, I feel Kelly should stay till some money is available. But there is so much confusion around, it is perplexing. Players supposedly fit and not playing. Why bother giving an injury update on the OS? Given that Kelly should be sacked if we lose another game by 2 goals and offers the same apologies irrelevant of the money promise.
ithuriel Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 something needs to change , we had a good october but other than that we have been very poor. i think even if kelly stayed we would just about scrape enough points together to stay up but then we would go through the same thing next season.
Thracian Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 something needs to change , we had a good october but other than that we have been very poor. i think even if kelly stayed we would just about scrape enough points together to stay up but then we would go through the same thing next season. I'd just about agree but if we did stay up under Kelly I see no signs pointing to the Promised Land. Kelly is like the seasons. They all have their plus points but are never going to change in a hurry. He's as unimaginative as his after-match interviews.
l444ry Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 Rob Kelly is proving to be a one trick pony and relegation is more likely than not this time around. The team has no experienced players who can run the show on the pitch and therefore Kelly's lack of mangerial experience and imagination has become a serious millstone around this club's head.
lcfc_jme Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 The way we are at the minute, we're fooking awful and look increasingly likely to be relegated. After yesterday's horror show, I think drastic changes need to be implemented in order to keep us up. Can Kelly make these changes? I think not. Will we get relegated? Yes. Should we keep Kelly in? No (I'd just like to say that the drastic changes involve Milan's money, new personnel and replacing Kelly with somebody a little more tactically-knowledgeable)
Ultra Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 If Kelly stays in charge and fails to balance the team we could well go down. Mandaric is no fool...and the potential players he wants will know what the table says too. Some might not want the risk to their careers, no matter what the wages and would MM be keen to offer reasonable contracts if we might go down? And how many players would he bring in anyway?. We certainly need four. And they will almost certainly displace fairly senior players so maintaining harmony - not necessarily Kelly's best quality from all the stories so far - won't be any easier unless the surplus is unloaded promptly. Plus, it may take time for the new players to adapt to our tactical master plan of contain and pinch one. A long time in some cases, unless the plan changes this morning and for ever. I voted No, we won't get relegated. But only on the assumption that whatever MM does, the board gets Beaglehole or someone like him in as caretaker before we dig an even bigger pit for ourselves to climb out of. I don't see the poison dwarf having problems attracting players to Leeds, so there shouldn't be any problems for us either.. And if the players currently on the books aren't capable of helping us reach the Premiership, then bomb them out. Seniority shouldn't even be an issue.
holly Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 last season i had a real feeling of doubt and actually thought we would!! i dont like losing etc, but for some reason i dont have the same doubt and worry as i did before
Head Honcho Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 I'm more worried this season then I was last season about us being relegated and that's saying something!
davieG Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 We are as good as relegated when looking at the current stats. We have the 3rd worst win record We have the 3rd worst goals for record We are 3rd bottom based on current form from the last eight matches If you look at most of the other stats on there we are nealy always 2nd or 3rd bottom 16 Crystal Palace 21 7 5 9 25 26 -1 26 17 Ipswich Town 21 7 4 10 31 31 0 25 18 Luton Town 21 7 4 10 28 36 -8 25 19 Queens Park Rangers 21 6 6 9 31 36 -5 24 20 Leicester City 21 5 7 9 20 28 -8 22 21 Barnsley 21 6 4 11 27 38 -11 22 22 Leeds United 21 6 2 13 24 41 -17 20 23 Hull City 21 4 5 12 18 33 -15 17 24 Southend United 21 2 6 13 16 38 -22 12
DB11 Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 No - but ONLY because Mandarics money will provide players for Kelly or whoever to keep up us up If we didn't have a takeover deal then we would probably be in a relegation zone.
newtonfox Posted 3 December 2006 Posted 3 December 2006 No - but ONLY because Mandarics money will provide players for Kelly or whoever to keep up us up If we didn't have a takeover deal then we would probably be in a relegation zone. agree with that MM in or bust
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.