Floating Fox Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 You knew someone was going to moan about it. It was a right laugh !! 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1....Woooooooah WHEY!
davieG Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 I think it would be effective and slightly more original if you could get the whole stadium doing just the 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1....Woooooooah in unison rather than a traditional mexican wave.
Southern Fox Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 If theres one thing our shity round stadiums is good for, it's mexican waves. I quite enjoyed it TBH. I enjoyed it too Always do Especially booing when it goes round the away support
fosterfox Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 this is the first time i have felt compelled enough to post. waves are embarrassing - your are not mexicans, you are ****s. along with the "number 13: paul".....HENDERSON!, the post horn gallop remix bollocks and that shitty "we're in it together" flag; we are becoming a small time family club.
Manwell Pablo Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 this is the first time i have felt compelled enough to post. waves are embarrassing - your are not mexicans, you are ****s. along with the "number 13: paul".....HENDERSON!, the post horn gallop remix bollocks and that shitty "we're in it together" flag; we are becoming a small time family club. Note wrong wit mexican waves, although you are spot on with the rest of it.
Kilworthfox Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 this is the first time i have felt compelled enough to post. waves are embarrassing - your are not mexicans, you are ****s. along with the "number 13: paul".....HENDERSON!, the post horn gallop remix bollocks and that shitty "we're in it together" flag; we are becoming a small time family club. I agree that the timing, scoreline are important to considder when starting a mexican wave, having said that its always nice to see LCFC fans joining in together for some support so I don't see the harm. The other points are most valid & I am in agreement with you, but proberbly best to find an arguement on them, in their own topic.
Jimmy Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 this is the first time i have felt compelled enough to post. waves are embarrassing - your are not mexicans, you are ****s. along with the "number 13: paul".....HENDERSON!, the post horn gallop remix bollocks and that shitty "we're in it together" flag; we are becoming a small time family club. he have always been a small family club, i would guess from that your from the "o'Neill Generation2 and think we are a big club because we had a few golden years where we MASSIVLY over achieved
Chimp Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 Look, just sit the f**k down and let me watch the football, please! Honestly, are we really that desperate that we celebrate as if we'd won the FA Cup when we're just 2-0 up against a relegation doomed team? The time for Mexican waves is when we've secured promotion, whenever the hell that will be. PS: Yes, I am in a bad mood. Sorry.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 It would look better if we had ten going at once.
The People's Hero Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 It would look better if we had ten going at once. Or if it was going both ways at once and where it met, people exploded!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ACE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fez of Mahrez Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 Or if it was going both ways at once and where it met, people exploded!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ACE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I vote yes.
Southern Fox Home Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 EAST STAND START THE WAVE EAST STAND EAST STAND START THE WAVE Sorry I love it
Fez of Mahrez Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 AND AN IAN ORMONDROYD. <attempts to join in> <throat protests> <nearly dies of laughter anyway>
Daggers Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 this is the first time i have felt compelled enough to post. waves are embarrassing - your are not mexicans, you are ****s. Thanks for your post, welcome to the forum...can't wait for the next missive
potter3 Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 this is the first time i have felt compelled enough to post.waves are embarrassing - your are not mexicans, you are ****s. Yeah, becuase the mexican wave was started by Mexicans
The People's Hero Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 Yeah and actually I am Mexican. So suck on that, amigo. OLE!
gilesyboy Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 Personally I hate them, unless it's towards the end of the game (2-3 mins) and we're winning by 2 goals or more. But they look good on TV though - whoopieshit. I just feel the players who are working for a victory deserve the attention and support from a passionate crowd and not the indifference of 25,000 people looking anyware other than what's actually going on on the pitch ready to stand up and wave like kids a Westlife gig. Just my grumpy old opinion though. Oh, and what's worse are the tossers who do the countdown 3...2...1..... and all that crap to get it started and try to get the crowd into it and then encourage booing of sections when then decline to take part, for ****s sake watch the game you crowd following, mobmentality minded sheep - w@nkers Happy christmas all
The People's Hero Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 Personally I hate them, unless it's towards the end of the game (2-3 mins) and we're winning by 2 goals or more. But they look good on TV though - whoopieshit. I just feel the players who are working for a victory deserve the attention and support from a passionate crowd and not the indifference of 25,000 people looking anyware other than what's actually going on on the pitch ready to stand up and wave like kids a Westlife gig. Just my grumpy old opinion though. Oh, and what's worse are the tossers who do the countdown 3...2...1..... and all that crap to get it started and try to get the crowd into it and then encourage booing of sections when then decline to take part, for ****s sake watch the game you crowd following, mobmentality minded sheep - w@nkers Happy christmas all Alright Ashley, you're having a crap series. No need to take it out on us though.
Matt Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 Personally I hate them, unless it's towards the end of the game (2-3 mins) and we're winning by 2 goals or more. But they look good on TV though - whoopieshit. I just feel the players who are working for a victory deserve the attention and support from a passionate crowd and not the indifference of 25,000 people looking anyware other than what's actually going on on the pitch ready to stand up and wave like kids a Westlife gig. Just my grumpy old opinion though. Oh, and what's worse are the tossers who do the countdown 3...2...1..... and all that crap to get it started and try to get the crowd into it and then encourage booing of sections when then decline to take part, for ****s sake watch the game you crowd following, mobmentality minded sheep - w@nkers Happy christmas all Correct me if i'm wrong but it was heading towards then end of the game (about 70 - 75 maybe even 80 minutes - Fair enough not 2 -3 mins but towards the end of the game) and we were winning by 2 goals! As I said correct me if i'm wrong...
The People's Hero Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 I thought the first one was about 61 minutes ish. Having said that, Barnsley could have played for a month and still not scored.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 Correct me if i'm wrong but it was heading towards then end of the game (about 70 - 75 maybe even 80 minutes - Fair enough not 2 -3 mins but towards the end of the game) and we were winning by 2 goals! As I said correct me if i'm wrong... I'd say it was about 70 minutes in. Their player went down injured in their area and the kids couldn't wait two minutes without finding something to do. I thought it was pretty good actually. It suits the stadium well, and looks good in a full stadium which we've only been close to two or three times this season. In the absence of any witty or original chants (other than from TPH on his own in C2), I'll take a Mexican wave. I like the "you should be watching the players put the effort into winning 2-0 against Barnsley" argument. The club go on about the bloody atmosphere. Had it not been for the Mexican wave, the atmosphere would have been non-existent yet again.
The People's Hero Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 I'd say it was about 70 minutes in. Their player went down injured in their area and the kids couldn't wait two minutes without finding something to do. I thought it was pretty good actually. It suits the stadium well, and looks good in a full stadium which we've only been close to two or three times this season. In the absence of any witty or original chants (other than from TPH on his own in C2), I'll take a Mexican wave. I like the "you should be watching the players put the effort into winning 2-0 against Barnsley" argument. The club go on about the bloody atmosphere. Had it not been for the Mexican wave, the atmosphere would have been non-existent yet again. The atmosphere WAS non-existant.
Guest Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 I can't believe that there's critical analysis of a mexican wave, and its effects upon the outcome of a game that was already decided. Whoops, I must behave myself!
The People's Hero Posted 18 December 2006 Posted 18 December 2006 I can't believe that there's critical analysis of a mexican wave, and its effects upon the outcome of a game that was already decided. Whoops, I must behave myself! Behave yourself, Shepherds Bush.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.