Thracian Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 To my mind we still have three particular weaknesses and should address at least two. Horsfield and Jarrett should be out. Hence: Henderson; Maybury, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Nils; Newton, King, Hughes, Porter; Hammond, Hume. Subs: Logan, Stearman, Tiatto, Gradel, Fryatt.
Ric Flair Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Hughes shouldn't be allowed in the centre for us again.
Manwell Pablo Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Hughes shouldn't be allowed in the centre for us again. Yep, Hughes was much worse than Jarret on Tuesday.
Flynny Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 I still maintain that Jarrett was very good yesterday. MUCH better than Hughes, certainly, who was dire. I think Hughes had a decent last 10 minutes though, and since Johnson's just as likely to be shite, I'd give Hughes maybe another 45 minutes just to see if he can get back into the groove at CM, and sub him at half time if he's dire again. So going with team's that Kelly is actually likely to play, I'd like to see Horsfield out and Fryatt/Hammond in, depending on if Fryatt's fit. Maybe Stearman for Maybury, too. Maybe.
FrankieWorthoYaggedMyWife Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Douglas Stearmen Kenton Johnansson Sheehan Yeates Johnson Wesolowski Cadamarteri Birchenall (Free Role) Hammond Just for a bit of variety!!!! Personally I think it will be Henderson Maybury Kisnorbo McAuley Johansson Newton Hughes Jarrett Porter Horsfield Hume
Webbo Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 I still maintain that Jarrett was very good yesterday. MUCH better than Hughes, certainly, who was dire. I think Hughes had a decent last 10 minutes though, and since Johnson's just as likely to be shite, I'd give Hughes maybe another 45 minutes just to see if he can get back into the groove at CM, and sub him at half time if he's dire again. So going with team's that Kelly is actually likely to play, I'd like to see Horsfield out and Fryatt/Hammond in, depending on if Fryatt's fit. Maybe Stearman for Maybury, too. Maybe. yep, i'd agree with that, i don't think hughes is that bad a player i just think he lacks courage.
ihatederby Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 HENDERSON STEARMAN KISNORBO McAULEY JOHANSSON HUGHES JOHNSON JARRETT PORTER HUME TODOROV (if we get him by then)
STUHILL Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Henderson Stearman Kisnorbo Mcauley Nils Porter Tiatto Jarret Newton Hume Fryatt subs - Logan, Maybury, Wesoloski, Yeates, Hammond. How anyone can include Hughes in starting 11 after that performance is a joke!
lcfc_jme Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Couldn't give two shits who turns up on Saturday - we'll have 2 or 3 players putting in effort and the rest will just be going through the motions. It will be another bore-draw with some of the most unadventurous football imaginable. The actual starting lineup will again be as close to yesterdays as feasibly possible. No point in asking/wanting any different any more - under Kelly it'll never change and nothing will ever shock.
Daggers Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Couldn't give two shits who turns up on Saturday - we'll have 2 or 3 players putting in effort and the rest will just be going through the motions. It will be another bore-draw with some of the most unadventurous football imaginable. The actual starting lineup will again be as close to yesterdays as feasibly possible. No point in asking/wanting any different any more - under Kelly it'll never change and nothing will ever shock. What he said. Word.
foxes_fan Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 To my mind we still have three particular weaknesses and should address at least two. Horsfield and Jarrett should be out. Hence: Henderson; Maybury, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Nils; Newton, King, Hughes, Porter; Hammond, Hume. Subs: Logan, Stearman, Tiatto, Gradel, Fryatt. ffs King and Gradel will never been in the first team squad and you know it!
lookwhaticando Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 The actual starting lineup will again be as close to yesterdays as feasibly possible. No point in asking/wanting any different any more - under Kelly it'll never change and nothing will ever shock. As for the concept of a Team for ____ Thread... it's really getting a bit... well, predictable really. We all know what the team really will be... yet we still manage to come up with 3 or 4 pages of what we hope the team will be and why. I reckon we should just copy and paste what we each wrote the previous week... save everyone a lot of typing. Unfortunately, my prediction that my post would be duplicated on Friday was a couple of days out... but you get the idea.
Flexx Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Henderson Maybury McAuley Kisnorbo Nils Newton Jarrett Wesolowski (Whats happened to him?) Porter Hume Cadamarteri Subs: Logan, Kenton, Tiatto, Hammond, Fryatt
Joe. Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Hendo Maybury Kisnorbo McAuley Nissa Newton Jarrett Hughes (What other attacking options do we have?) Porter Huuuuuuuuuume Hammond
dandannieldanok Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Hendo Maybury Kisnorbo Stearman Nisse Newton Tiatto Jarrett Porter McAuley Fryatt
Mikey Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 I'd like a tiny bit of a change around: Henderson LB Nils CB Kisnorbo CB Mcauley RB Maybury RM Newton DM/CM Weso/Jarrett (if fit) AM Huuuummmmeee LM Porter ST Cadamarteri ST Fryatt Both of them if they are fit Subs: Logan, Stearman, Hammond, Horsield, Yeates. That's the team I would like but I doubt RK's gonnaa change it from Leeds.
Shroomjuice Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 THE YOUTH ACADEMY plus hume kisnorbo mcauley Im sick of seeing the same rubish everyweek At least they would put in 110% and stand just as much chance of winning they cant be as piss poor as the rest of our dyer league 2 jokes of footballers
Simi Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Couldn't give two shits who turns up on Saturday - we'll have 2 or 3 players putting in effort and the rest will just be going through the motions. It will be another bore-draw with some of the most unadventurous football imaginable. The actual starting lineup will again be as close to yesterdays as feasibly possible. No point in asking/wanting any different any more - under Kelly it'll never change and nothing will ever shock. All I can say is Hughes out. Weso in.
foxesfan1 Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 love to see hendo,maybury,norbo,mccauley,johhanson,yeates,newton,jaret,poter,hume,horse but be same as leeds game (basically same but hughes in instead of yeates )
Fez of Mahrez Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Henderson Maybury Johansson McAuley Kisnorbo Porter Jarrett Wesolowski Newton Hume Hammond
potter3 Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Hendo Maybury Kisnorbo McAuley Nils Newton Jarrett Hume Porter Hammond Cadders/Fryatt But a more likley midfield (even then it won't happen anyway) is: Newton Jarrett/Johson/Hughes/Tiatto Porter Yeates
Thracian Posted 14 March 2007 Author Posted 14 March 2007 Hughes shouldn't be allowed in the centre for us again. It's not so long ago you were quite a fan and I was feeling the odd one out for not rating him. I still don't rate him but feel he's better than Jarrett and will do til weso gets fit or we get someone else.
He's not bald Posted 14 March 2007 Posted 14 March 2007 Hendo Maybury Kisnorbo McAuley Nils Newton Jarrett Hume Porter Hammond Cadders/Fryatt But a more likley midfield (even then it won't happen anyway) is: Newton Jarrett/Johson/Hughes/Tiatto Porter Yeates any combo..+ a new manager!
Asha Posted 15 March 2007 Posted 15 March 2007 G: Henderson D: Maybury, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Kenton M: Porter, Jarrett, Yeates, Newton S: Hume, Hammond notice i left out johansson and horsfield that were no accident
davieG Posted 15 March 2007 Posted 15 March 2007 G: HendersonD: Maybury, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Kenton M: Porter, Jarrett, Yeates, Newton S: Hume, Hammond notice i left out johansson and horsfield that were no accident So why have you got a RB/CB playing at left back and left winger on the right and a right winger on the left? Are you keen on round pegs in square holes or were they accidents
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.