lookwhaticando Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 puma will only want the good teams though, are we good i think not.Villa have got nike as it is american Some teams still get their kits out of catoluges as well or will ask other suppliers i.e. southend with nike Plymouth?
Sods Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 As he said, catologues. yeah i was going to say that but he might know more knowledege and i would of looked more of a turnip.
mancunianfox Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 Don't care who makes the kit as long as its royal blue and hasn't got too much white on it.
lookwhaticando Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 yeah i was going to say that but he might know more knowledege and i would of looked more of a turnip. I was unsure myself, it was only one of two teams I could name with Puma kits. I thought perhaps they had been sponsored by Puma, since they don't seem to supply may other teams in the top two divisions.
Guest Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 yeah i was going to say that but he might know more knowledege and i would have looked more of a turnip. It didn't do Graham Taylor any harm.
Sods Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 I was unsure myself, it was only one of two teams I could name with Puma kits. I thought perhaps they had been sponsored by Puma, since they don't seem to supply may other teams in the top two divisions. Hang on a minute, aren't puma kits generally tight. How do those pasties fit into them. It didn't do Graham Taylor any harm. I like turnips but graham taylor ruined them. Or the press did
Tommeh Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 Would love a puma kit if I'm honest, however I didnt see too much wrong with our present kit, and my only concern if its crap (like most Jako kits I've seen) then we have to put up with it for 2 years as opposed to 1. Although performances on the pitch are way more important than the kit we wear.
BigGibbo Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 I think the away kit is black. nooooo can't we just have the white or yellow away kit to go with our legendary blue homekit
lookwhaticando Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 Does anyone actually 'know' that JAKO is indeed the future technical sponsor, or are we all just believing what Mandaric said on that moan-in some weeks ago? Call me sceptic, but until it's announced formally by the club, I'd rather not believe it.
Daggers Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 Does anyone actually 'know' that JAKO is indeed the future technical sponsor There's them on the forum that are in the "know"...but they aren't telling. Not even when other people say "Please" just like their Mums told them to.
Fox in a Box Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 well here the ranges to choose from!!! YAWN http://www.jakousa.com/pr/portsmouth.htm READ ON http://www.jakousa.com/
Stevosevic Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 Piss poor photoshoppage ftw. Could be worse i think we will be having blue shorts, read something from the foxestrust that it was suggested at a meeting
davieG Posted 7 May 2007 Author Posted 7 May 2007 i think we will be having blue shorts, read something from the foxestrust that it was suggested at a meeting I'm sure the colour of the shorts was decided well before that meeting, of course they could still be blue.
Bryn Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 I don't think we look that good in all blue, I think white shorts is miles better.
Fox in a Box Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 Piss poor photoshoppage ftw. Could be worse logo would be central i'd imagine....
Ozwin Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 Get rid of the Alliance & Leicester. It's such a tacky and un-impressive sponsor to have.
davieG Posted 7 May 2007 Author Posted 7 May 2007 Get rid of the Alliance & Leicester. It's such a tacky and un-impressive sponsor to have. All sponsorship is tacky why is this more tacky, why is less impressive than others? and does it matter anyway surely what's important is how much money you get
Sods Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 All blue means we always get promoted. martin o'neil era 95/96 micky adams era 02/03 i think
lookwhaticando Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 Get rid of the Alliance & Leicester. It's such a tacky and un-impressive sponsor to have. All sponsorship is tacky why is this more tacky, why is less impressive than others? and does it matter anyway surely what's important is how much money you get Beats me. The Alliance + Leicester sponsor logo is great... it's not a huge distracting blob of colour in the middle of the shirt as some sponsors are. And A+L is one of the country's biggest financial institutions - I can't see how that's any tackier than being sponsored by anyone else. They're a big respectable business, as big as any that might see fit to sponsor us... I'd rather be sponsored by A+L than say a soft toy maker.
lildave3 Posted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007 All blue means we always get promoted.martin o'neil era 95/96 micky adams era 02/03 i think Exactly what I think when I hear about blue shorts.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.