MBK Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Only those at the game please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lildave3 Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Hendo - 6 Chambers - 7 Mattock - 6 McAuley - 7.5 Bruno - 7.5 Newton - 6 Wesolowski - 6 Clemence - 6 Kishishev - 6 De Vries - 7 Hume - 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SystonFox Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Hendo - 6 Chambers - 6.5 Mattock - 6 McAuley - 7.5 Bruno - 7.5 Newton - 6 Wesolowski - 6 Clemence - 7 Kishishev - 6 De Vries - 6 Hume - 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trumpet Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Hendo - 6 Chambers - 6.5 Mattock - 5 McAuley - 6 Bruno - 7 Newton - 6 Wesolowski - 6 Clemence - 5.5 Kishishev - 6 De Vries - 7 Hume - 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lillehamring Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 these ratings all seem rather high for a lost game, especially 8 for a striker when only 9 of 21 shots hit the target, and no goals... or were we really just desperately unlucky and blackpool were just flukey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Mattock 4.5, N'gotty 6.5 all the rest 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trumpet Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 these ratings all seem rather high for a lost game, especially 8 for a striker when only 9 of 21 shots hit the target, and no goals...or were we really just desperately unlucky and blackpool were just flukey? I'd say we was unlucky, but Hume deserved an 8, which IMO is above average, or one of the better players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 No one's mentioned subs - any make an impact or impress? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SystonFox Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 these ratings all seem rather high for a lost game, especially 8 for a striker when only 9 of 21 shots hit the target, and no goals...or were we really just desperately unlucky and blackpool were just flukey? i'd say we were really unlucky. hit the bar in the 1st half and post in the 2nd with their keeper making 2double saves im sure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trumpet Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 No one's mentioned subs - any make an impact or impress? DJ Campbell impressed, as did Hayes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluefoxtim Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Hendo - 5 (no communication with the defence - put us in trouble) Chambers - 7.5 Mattock - 4.5 (I know he is young but he needs to learn to cross it without having to beat his man first!) McAuley - 7 Bruno - 7.5 Newton - 6 Wesolowski - 5 (though out of position) Clemence - 6 Kishishev - 5 De Vries - 7 Hume - 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lildave3 Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 i'd say we were really unlucky. hit the bar in the 1st half and post in the 2nd with their keeper making 2double saves im sure? Really unlucky? The better team won for me. They wanted it more. Alot more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryanside Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 I thought Hayes looked very good today, ran after every bad, very good touch and very quick. MDV had a good game too, hit the post twice. Mattock didnt really have a good game, kept hoofing the ball out of play when under pressure when there were other options. I thought Campbell looked a little off the pace today, wasnt reading Hume very well. Newton had a good game, looked strong and had a bit of pace about him, kept running all match Hendo - 6 Chambers - 6 Mattock - 4.5 McAuley - 7 Bruno - 5.5 Newton - 6.5 Wesolowski - 6 Clemence - 6 Kishishev - 5.5 De Vries - 6.5 Hume - 6.5 Subs Hayes - 6.5/7 DJ - 6 Stearman - 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GianEmmo Zola Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Hendo 6 Chambers 6 MCauley 6 N Gotty 7 MAttock 6 Kishishev 4 Weso 6 Clemence 6 Newton 5 De Vries 6 Hume 6 Dj 6 - another day these chances would have gone in, but it wasnt our day today unfortunatly Hayes 6 Stearman 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BartonFox Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Henderson - 5 - Lower league, inspires no confidence what so ever. Chambers - 6 - Improvement on any previous right back of the last couple of years. Mattock - 6 - As above, except left back. N'Gotty - 6 - Pace worries, but did ok. McAuley - 5 - Lower league or lower end CCC at best. Wesolowski - 5 - Poor lad too good to leave out but not a wide player. Newton - 5 - Still a poor mans Andy Impey. Kishisev - 5 - Huffed and puffed and is better than Tiatto and Johnston in there. Clemence - 5 - Bit disappointing but better than what we've had. Hume - 6 - Runs around a bit but didn't score when he had chances. de Vries - 6 - Worked hard but didn't score when he had chances. Stearman - 5 - Try him alongside N'Gotty. Campbell - 5 - Wasn't good but wasn't bad either. Hayes - 6 - Not the answer to the left but better than anything we've had since Jordan Stewart (gulp!!!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
He's not bald Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Hendo - 6Chambers - 7 Mattock - 6 McAuley - 7.5 Bruno - 7.5 Newton - 6 Wesolowski - 6 Clemence - 6 Kishishev - 6 De Vries - 7 Hume - 7 That is minus 7 right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lildave3 Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Henderson - 5 - Lower league, inspires no confidence what so ever.Chambers - 6 - Improvement on any previous right back of the last couple of years. Mattock - 6 - As above, except left back. N'Gotty - 6 - Pace worries, but did ok. McAuley - 5 - Lower league or lower end CCC at best. Wesolowski - 5 - Poor lad too good to leave out but not a wide player. Newton - 5 - Still a poor mans Andy Impey. Kishisev - 5 - Huffed and puffed and is better than Tiatto and Johnston in there. Clemence - 5 - Bit disappointing but better than what we've had. Hume - 6 - Runs around a bit but didn't score when he had chances. de Vries - 6 - Worked hard but didn't score when he had chances. Stearman - 5 - Try him alongside N'Gotty. Campbell - 5 - Wasn't good but wasn't bad either. Hayes - 6 - Not the answer to the left but better than anything we've had since Jordan Stewart (gulp!!!) Harsh on McAuley, he was very solid along with Bruno imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Hendo - 5 Chambers - 6 Mattock - 4.5 McAuley - 6 Bruno - 6 Newton - 5 Wesolowski - 5 Clemence - 4.5 Kishishev - 5 De Vries - 6 Hume - 7 Hayes - 6 DJ - 5 Stearman - 5 The Captain and the Apprentice were the two worst players, Hume was the best. The midfield was totally overun for the first 30 and matched for the next 30, we only gained control after they scored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trumpet Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Harsh on McAuley, he was very solid along with Bruno imo. He hoofed it when he didn't have to a bit too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
He's not bald Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Really unlucky? The better team won for me. They wanted it more. Alot more. We didn't have a fecking clue,long ball,long ball,long fecking ball in the first half! I am fuming...fecking waste of time...god know's what will happen when we come up against a team with some half decent finishers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trumpet Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 We didn't have a fecking clue,long ball,long ball,long fecking ball in the first half! I am fuming...fecking waste of time...god know's what will happen when we come up against a team with some half decent finishers! McAuley, McAuley, McAuley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toby or not Toby Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 We didn't have a fecking clue,long ball,long ball,long fecking ball in the first half! I am fuming...fecking waste of time...god know's what will happen when we come up against a team with some half decent finishers! fook sake its one game. Yes we were poor, but come on dont go writing them off just yet! You cant turn a shit team into promotion/mid table team over night No wonder were so poor if muppets like you just moan and dent their confidence! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BartonFox Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 fook sake its one game. Yes we were poor, but come on dont go writing them off just yet! You cant turn a shit team into promotion/mid table team over night No wonder were so poor if muppets like you just moan and dent their confidence! Can you please explain how his comments had an adverse effect on the team today, because I am f'cked if I can work it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simi Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 Henderson - 5 - Very shaky, agree with Barton that he lacked confidence. Chambers - 6 - Unfortunately got injured, I thought he did well. McAuley - 6 - Got done for pace time to time N Gotty - 7 - What he lacks in pace, he makes up with his knowledge of the game. Mattock - 5 - Weak, panicked a lot. Newton - 6 - Backwards ! Kish - 6 - Steady, little hurried. Clemence - 6 - Didn't really do much, clever ball player. Weso - 5 - He is just not a winger Hume - 6 - Busy as usual, didn't get enough chances De Vries - 6 - Still struggles in the air, did well when played to feet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FleckneyFox Posted 11 August 2007 Share Posted 11 August 2007 God you guys are being way to kind Henderson 5.5 Had nothing to do really Chambers 7 Positive running forward made a couple of decent tackles N'Gotty 6 Made good tackles but took far to long to take his free kicks McAuley 7 Won his challenges, later on in the game made forward runs Mattock 5 Terrible game didnt do anything good really mistake led to the goal Wesolowski 5.5 Quiet game made a couple of good runs thats about it Kishishev 5 Lost the ball far to often was firdst man to come off Clemence 5.5 See Kishishev just that he made a couple of decent passes Newton 6.5 Was best midfielder good running De Vries 5.5 Had one good shot that hit the bar couldnt win a header to save his life Hume 6.5 Had a decent game contested every ball but never really produced the goods Campbell 6.5 Looked lively almost scored twice but for the keeper Stearman 6 Didnt shine but did half decent when he was on the ball Hayes 6.5 looked lively ran at people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.