Jimmy Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 doesn't seem to be a thread yet so I thought I would start it Alnwick Stearman* McAuley Kisnorbo ClaphamHume Clemence Oakley LaczkoCampbell HowardSubs J. Chambers/Wesolowski, N'Gotty, Fryatt, Hayles, Mattock*/Bori *If fit Think we should keep the team the same as much as possible to that that did the bulk of the work against Norwich
Nath Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 doesn't seem to be a thread yet so I thought I would start it Alnwick Stearman* McAuley Kisnorbo ClaphamHume Clemence Oakley LaczkoCampbell HowardSubs J. Chambers/Wesolowski, N'Gotty, Fryatt, Hayles, Mattock*/Bori *If fit Think we should keep the team the same as much as possible to that that did the bulk of the work against Norwich Snap, crackle & pop
Messi Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 doesn't seem to be a thread yet so I thought I would start it Alnwick Stearman* McAuley Kisnorbo ClaphamHume Clemence Oakley LaczkoCampbell HowardSubs J. Chambers/Wesolowski, N'Gotty, Fryatt, Hayles, Mattock*/Bori *If fit Think we should keep the team the same as much as possible to that that did the bulk of the work against Norwich Same and if Stearman isnt fit then play Chambers because he looked very good when he came on, on saturday
RowlattsFox Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 When we've won so far under Ollie, the team has been unchanged the following game, injury and suspensions permitting of course. I would like to see Laczko start but I won't be suprised to see Mattock start on the left again if fit.
ASH17LCFC Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 doesn't seem to be a thread yet so I thought I would start it Alnwick Stearman* McAuley Kisnorbo ClaphamHume Clemence Oakley LaczkoCampbell HowardSubs J. Chambers/Wesolowski, N'Gotty, Fryatt, Hayles, Mattock*/Bori *If fit Think we should keep the team the same as much as possible to that that did the bulk of the work against Norwich Yep make sence to keep the same team. They should be all really up for it now and go there with all guns blazing. Coventry will probally have a new manager and be really up for it aswell. We do have a better players then Cov and should beat them.
Mark Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 I definitely wouldn't start Laczko away from home, we've not really any other option though.
Bryn Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 Alnwick Stearman McAuley Kisnorbo ClaphamHume Oakley Clemence LaczkoCampbell Howard Why not start Laczko? If he did alright against Norwich he deserves another bite at the cherry. We shouldn't fear Coventry, and besides from what I've heard he's a bit of a grafter anyway isn't he? Hume has earned another game on the right wing. Unchanged really, certainly no reason to change a team which performed well.
Koke Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 I definitely wouldn't start Laczko away from home, we've not really any other option though. That's the thing. Mattock is certainly not the answer there. I think Mattock suffering a dead leg against Norwich was probably a blessing in disguise.
Bryn Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 Their right back should still be cleaning the shit out of his underpants from the last time Lazcko played them tbh.
Chimp Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 I wanna see... Alnwick Stearman - McCauley - Kisnorbo - Clapham Bori - Oakley - Clemence - Lascko Howard - Hume Subs: Campbell, Fryatt, Mattock, Chambers, Hendo ...with Clapham given instruction to close down his man sooner and stop letting in so many crosses. If Bori on the right is not working then we can bring on DJ and move Hume to the right wing, though I'd much rather see Howard and Hume have a full game together up front.
dandannieldanok Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 and besides from what I've heard he's a bit of a grafter anyway isn't he? I've heard the complete opposite but I haven't actually seen him play so I could be wrong.
Chimp Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 I've heard the complete opposite but I haven't actually seen him play so I am wrong. Fixed.
Bryn Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 I've heard the complete opposite but I haven't actually seen him play so I could be wrong. Aye I haven't either so I'll see what others say but I always thought he did track back a bit.
Fox You Forest Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 That's the thing. Mattock is certainly not the answer there.I think Mattock suffering a dead leg against Norwich was probably a blessing in disguise. Bori is steady enough i would go with him.
George Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 Marshall Mcnamee Ward Dann Fox Tabb Hughes Hughes Gray Best Mifsud Although wouldnt surprise me if we get a few in on loan.
Bryn Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 MarshallMcnamee Ward Dann Fox Tabb Hughes Hughes Gray Best Mifsud Although wouldnt surprise me if we get a few in on loan. I can't quite put my finger on why but you're really annoying.
WetFlannel Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 --------------------------Alnwick----------------------------- Chambers-------Kisnorbo-----Mcauley-----------Clapham Hume------------Clemence----Oakley------------Laczko -------------------Campbell-----Howard------------------- Subs: N'Gotty Mattock (if fit) Hayles Bori Weso
Staf Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 --------------------------Alnwick-----------------------------Chambers-------Kisnorbo-----Mcauley-----------Clapham Hume------------Clemence----Oakley------------Laczko -------------------Campbell-----Howard------------------- Subs: N'Gotty Mattock (if fit) Hayles Bori Weso That is what i would choose i would have to think about Clapham over Mattock though although Clapham has played well recently
Thracian Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 Dependent on injuries: Alnwick; Stearman, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Clapham; Hume, Clemence, Oakley, Laczko; Howard, Campbell. Subs: Henderson, Chambers, Wesolowski, Beswick, Fryatt. As if there's any chance of that! :D
Joe. Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 Dependent on injuries:Alnwick; Stearman, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Clapham; Hume, Clemence, Oakley, Laczko; Howard, Campbell. Yeah I'd go with that. I'd still be reluctant to play Hume on the right but with the game he had against Norwich it'd be hard to drop him.
Sods Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 Same team. Chambers in for Stearman Zsolt in for Mattock. If they are unfit.
maddog Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 Alnwick Stearman or Chambers (don't mind who) Mattock Mc auley Kisnorbo Bori Clemence Oakley Zsolt Hume Howard or Campbell Start Hume up front pleaseeeeeee, not ring wing again. Bori has been solid in all his games there. Bench: Howard or Campbell, Stearman or Chambers, Fryatt, Kishishev, N Gotty.
Sods Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 4-0. And people change the side. If people want consintancy, how will they get it. Unless their are injuries surely the same team should be picked.
Joe. Posted 18 February 2008 Posted 18 February 2008 4-0.And people change the side. If people want consintancy, how will they get it. Unless their are injuries surely the same team should be picked. Even Mattock who didn't have the best of games?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.