Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
fox123

Mr Daggers

By fox123, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

AoWW

AoWW

Posted
Posted
but when a 44 year old man in teaching says he wants to has/ had sex with my 9 yr old daughter

Would it have been ok if he wasn't in teaching? Only you do seem to have emphasised that particular point in every post. :dunno:

lucy%20rag%20doll.jpg

:ph34r: I would. :sweating:

skinnydipper

skinnydipper

Posted
Posted
I couldn't give a toss what he called me to be honest Cork's - he, like anyone else, is perfectly at liberty to place people he doesn't want to read on 'ignore'. The fact that they don't and feel pressed to whine just opens them up to more ridicule and piss-taking.

He can call me a donkey-raping ginger peado with Aids, random internet ****** mean nothing. If it had come from any of the lovely people on here I've met and drank with then that would have upset me...and in that vein I've apologised to Katy if she was offended.

123fox, on the other hand, can suck my ring (which is something I believe he does for cash).

I have standards. They may be low but I still have them.

Can I have an apology as well?

I don't know what for but I'd just quite like one

AoWW

AoWW

Posted
Posted
Of course it would not you thick bint :frusty:

So why keep banging on about him being a teacher?

AoWW

AoWW

Posted
Posted
Forget it sweet (and sorry for calling you a bint)

:dunno: I've been called worse. :|

Darkzzz_

Darkzzz_

Posted
Posted

I have missed a lot then so it seems.

Ok, so I didn't see the original posts that were posted/deleted.

At the end of the day, we are all different in terms of our persona and especially our sense of humour,

Some are more open to things than others and probably just take things with a pinch of salt. Where as some will find certain subjects and topics disturbing.

I probably fall into the extreme sense of humour but I know where to draw the line and I usually know that by the people I am having the banter with, I know how much certain people can take.

I would never go out of my way to offend or accuse somebody it is not my style. If I have then I would always apologize and admit any wrong doings.

I don't know Daggers on a personal level, but going by the majority of his posts, I find most of his post are decent. There is a lot of posters on here I respect, but some I couldn't care less about.

Fox123 is however free to air his views of course and I am certainly not going to give him any hassle, Even though the accusations are probably going a little too far.

Some people do annoy me on here, there has always been a certain level of arrogance amongst some posters, a lot of ass licking because certain people have more posts than others and there are a lot of followers.

I don't mind, each to there own.

I will always give my honest view on topics, right or wrong, I don't care if someone has 20,000 posts or if someone has 20 posts, I am not going to agree with the person who has more posts because he is a regular here.

My conclusion is this: (As I don't like being too serious but just had to give my view for what it's worth.)

Daggers needs to be locked away from society!!

fox123

fox123

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I have missed a lot then so it seems.

Ok, so I didn't see the original posts that were posted/deleted.

At the end of the day, we are all different in terms of our persona and especially our sense of humour,

Some are more open to things than others and probably just take things with a pinch of salt. Where as some will find certain subjects and topics disturbing.

I probably fall into the extreme sense of humour but I know where to draw the line and I usually know that by the people I am having the banter with, I know how much certain people can take.

I would never go out of my way to offend or accuse somebody it is not my style. If I have then I would always apologize and admit any wrong doings.

I don't know Daggers on a personal level, but going by the majority of his posts, I find most of his post are decent. There is a lot of posters on here I respect, but some I couldn't care less about.

Fox123 is however free to air his views of course and I am certainly not going to give him any hassle, Even though the accusations are probably going a little too far.

Some people do annoy me on here, there has always been a certain level of arrogance amongst some posters, a lot of ass licking because certain people have more posts than others and there are a lot of followers.

I don't mind, each to there own.

I will always give my honest view on topics, right or wrong, I don't care if someone has 20,000 posts or if someone has 20 posts, I am not going to agree with the person who has more posts because he is a regular here.

My conclusion is this: (As I don't like being too serious but just had to give my view for what it's worth.)

Daggers needs to be locked away from society!!

Good post, though I would just like to point this bit out, where I didn't actually mean to call him a paedophile.

I did actually mean to say that it could, to some people, come across in a potentially paedophillic way. Though I didn't feel the need to justify myself, not after just getting ridiculed for standing up for something that I believe in.

If you need to pick at my post, fair point, at the time of posting that I was pretty angry from what I had just read from him and the fact the posts had been deleted before any one got the chance to see it.

The be all and end all is, whether it was made in jest or not, I think to make sexual references like that is disgusting, and to someone who doesn't know him then its a worry to read such things. If my daughter was on this forum, I would be quite worried by such posts.

I'm not a fan of porn either. I think it's degrading and demeaning to women and a mysoginistic exploitation of them as mere sexual objects, each to their own I guess.

People were just quick to pick up on any discrepancies that were in my original post, because, they really didn't know how else to deal with it.

I will openly apologise if my original post come across in the way that I was accusing him of being a Paedophile, as stated above that's not the way it meant to come out, but I certainly wont apologise for the reasoning behind the post.

SOCCERROO FOX

SOCCERROO FOX

Posted
Posted
Everyone has had their say and I dont think anyone would disagree when I say this has run it's course now.

Could everyone just let it go now?

Not until we find out who Pedro was or is

fox123

fox123

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Everyone has had their say and I dont think anyone would disagree when I say this has run it's course now.

Could everyone just let it go now?

I'm hated by most now, because of a typo. You would be amazed how many PM's I have had though saying well done for challenging Daggers, it's ironic that post's he has put in this thread haven't been laughed at, yet he continued to post them.

Again, I will openly apologise for an error on my behalf (albeit a typing error) who else would do that? The man in question certainly wouldn't.

Bazaldo

Bazaldo

Posted
Posted
I'm hated by most now, because of a typo. You would be amazed how many PM's I have had though saying well done for challenging Daggers, it's ironic that post's he has put in this thread haven't been laughed at, yet he continued to post them.

Again, I will openly apologise for an error on my behalf (albeit a typing error) who else would do that? The man in question certainly wouldn't.

Anyone making lightheartedness of themselves being a nonce needs to spend time inside accused of such, they'd get a quick shoeing.

with you 123. So enoughs enough.

Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted
Anyone making lightheartedness of themselves being a nonce needs to spend time inside accused of such, they'd get a quick shoeing.

with you 123. So enoughs enough.

:frusty: Jesus. Fucking. Christ.

He isn't a pedo. We aren't laughing because it's possible he may be a pedo. We're laughing because it's such a far-fetched, stupid, leftfield statement to come out with in the first place.

It'd be about as stupid a statement as me calling you an educated, well rounded, civil human being with a broad and wide understanding of global culture.

fox123

fox123

Posted
  • Author
Posted
:frusty: Jesus. Fucking. Christ.

He isn't a pedo. We aren't laughing because it's possible he may be a pedo. We're laughing because it's such a far-fetched, stupid, leftfield statement to come out with in the first place.

It'd be about as stupid a statement as me calling you an educated, well rounded, civil human being with a broad and wide understanding of global culture.

You're doing a hard job trying to convince us all you're an intelligent, functioning member of this forum. Jeeeesus.

Ill revert to that quote from your self.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...