Ozwin Posted 7 July 2010 Posted 7 July 2010 It's late, I'm in the dark and I'm tired. I editted it a bit, dunno if it's much better.
Samilktray Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 you look silly now I look silly because I pointed out to him it was purple before he changed it. Silly me.
Master Fox Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Oh my word. Why? WHY! We always have the most gypo kit in the entire football league. All went down hill when we got rid of Fox Leisure in my opinion
Neil_LCFC Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Always the cheapest naffest kits that we can maximise the most profits out of our fans/mugs from.
Alexikokopops Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 you say that but my mate is a man u fan...and his shirt is far superior to this shit joma one we have now ! Except we're not Man Utd. Nike/Adidas wouldn't design a kit for us. We'd get the generic template in our colours,
Guest Mee-9 Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Oh my word. Why? WHY! We always have the most gypo kit in the entire football league. All went down hill when we got rid of Fox Leisure in my opinion I'm worried that these could be our sponsors:
dave_the_fox Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Always the cheapest naffest kits that we can maximise the most profits out of our fans/mugs from. How dare our club try and make money!
davieG Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Well as long as they identify our players on the pitch I couldn't care less, people keep saying our kits are the crappiest yet keep buying them and then wonder why we end up with the crappiests- brainless and naive springs to mind. I'm worried that these could be our sponsors: And people would still buy them in their thousands
JmorsonLCFC Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Just a thought, but does anyone think the delay in the new kits was due to it being Joma at first then having to change i completely to Burrda?
davieG Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Just a thought, but does anyone think the delay in the new kits was due to it being Joma at first then having to change i completely to Burrda? Not if they knew what it looks like which judging from the teasing would be the case. I still believe it's to do with the sponsor, Hoos, only recently said they had 3/4 options.
JmorsonLCFC Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 I'm still not sure. The Burrda kits I've saw so far for this season look nothing like the teaser, and seeing as we have not had a teaser for a whiile, my thoughts are that Burrda have been rushed in. Also, what happened to our 3 year deal with Joma?
Floating Fox Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Ha ha they make them for the british handball team too! :laugh: Your sig made me think of Bernie & Tommy G! ahaha! Can't belive people are moaning about or kit (AGAIN!). I'd rather have a unique(ish) shirt than a crappy generic addidas one, just so we can have a bigger brand on our kit, like plymouth have got. They still look shit. I like unknown shirt sponsors
foxoffderby Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Rubbish not impressed Derby have Addidas we get a Burka.
mancunianfox Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Adidas make horrible kits. Can't remember the last good Adidas shirt tbh. The world cup ones look like they went a bit mental with some parcel tape.
foxoffderby Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Adidas make horrible kits. Can't remember the last good Adidas shirt tbh. The world cup ones look like they went a bit mental with some parcel tape. Your wrong Derby home/away kits are awesome. Wont be buying the new City kit.
Bugg Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Are they fook, they are the same old generic kits, what's actually so good about it, the AMAZING 3 stripes on the sleeves?
foxoffderby Posted 8 July 2010 Posted 8 July 2010 Are they fook, they are the same old generic kits, what's actually so good about it, the AMAZING 3 stripes on the sleeves? I like it, its just personal choice. I dont rate our kit.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.