h1210 Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 Its Obvious that Burrda are the new Kit Suppliers, but are they the sponsors too? they now have a wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BURRDA which states that they SPONSOR us, wolves and watford. We know they sponsor and supply watford, but they only kit supply wolves, will they actually sponsor us too??? Also the blue shirt vitor is holding looks the same but on the neck it says LCFC other than 125 Years, whats the point espically since the kit supplier has changed, and surely its copyrighted to Joma? Would Imagine we will see something before the first pre season friendly, otherwise thay get snapped wearing it anyway! The white panels down the side of the shirt don't go to the very bottom on that picture either. Maybe changed to get around the copyright
ousefox Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 Quite nice actually. No news on the sponser then......
Callabinho Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 I don't like that one bit looks cheap No sponsor again ? New shirt
GUJJIFOX Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 stands out for the wrong reasons , its 'too' yellow ...more banana like. They could have applied a bit more white to the shirt and shorts. It almost looks one peice.
Sods Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 Its not bad at all, could possibly look better with a sponsor on it.
Babylon Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 I think it looks ok actually. Not ground breaking, but neat and tidy.
tbf Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 I think it's non-offensive, i don't dislike it but it isn't amazing. A decent sponsor and it should look ok. I really hope they move they City badge to the left breast for the home shirt. I remember them saying this time last year that a sponsor looked ok below Joma and the badge but i think they might change their mind. Fingers-crossed!
mancunianfox Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 I like the simplicity of it. A blue version of that would look really imo.
Libertine Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 Would prefer if it wasn't all yellow. Blue shorts maybe, like the late 90s away kits. Not terrible, but not great. Hope the sponsor improves it somehow.
hackneyfox Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 The sponsor (whoever it is) spoils all shirts for me.
Alexikokopops Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 I'm more concerned about "The kit deal is the biggest in Leicester City's history". I'd rather have a shit kit that gets us more monies than a fancy Adidas or Nike number that we end up paying for the privilege of having. Obviously I'd prefer it if we could have both, but if I'd have to chose one or t'other, the shit kit would win every time. As it stands, it's an alright kit. It'll probably look better with a sponsor.
Edmund Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 City also confirmed they were 'close' to securing a new shirt sponsor for 2010-11. City fans who purchase their shirts in the next two weeks will have the option to have the sponsor applied, by bringing their shirts into the City Megastore in early August. Buy it now if you want a sponsorless shirt. Good marketing that.
Bellend Sebastian Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 Buy it now if you want a sponsorless shirt. Good marketing that. There is a risk it could be Anusol or something. Is there such a thing as a good sponsor?
Tilley Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 Christ, it gets worse the more I look at it, that shade of yellow is vile.
Ricey Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 Quite like the away kit actually. I don't really like yellow kits but this one looks ok. Wish it had blue shorts though. Still don't understand the logic behind the home kit though, it's going to look quite a bit different to last seasons so why not just design an entirely new one?
Edmund Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 How boring and plain is that!? To be honest there's ample difference to most of the other shirts you and milktary wank over in the new club shirt thread. Maybe a collar here or a white stripe there difference
lildave3 Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 Take off the collar and add a bit more white and i'm a huge fan. As it is, it's ok.
Tilley Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 To be honest there's ample difference to most of the other shirts you and milktary wank over in the new club shirt thread. Maybe a collar here or a white stripe there difference I have posted 4 times in that thread...
Edmund Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 I have posted 4 times in that thread... My bad then, still my point is that there's ample difference between shirts which people seem to rave over and those which are classed as shit. There are some outstanding garish shirts like that Plymouth one but the others are a case of a stitch here and there which is really minor. I personally couldn't judge any clothing till I've felt it in the flesh.
davieG Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 My bad then, still my point is that there's ample difference between shirts which people seem to rave over and those which are classed as shit. There are some outstanding garish shirts like that Plymouth one but the others are a case of a stitch here and there which is really minor. I personally couldn't judge any clothing till I've felt it in the flesh. Like women then
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 12 July 2010 Posted 12 July 2010 I cant say I like that kit all that much. Maybe it will look better with a sponsor though.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.