Cat Burger Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 What a bag of wank, off goes the radio with a smack.
Babylon Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 **** - 2-0 11671[/snapback] Suprise suprise.... we have superior players to those of millwall and derby yet get outplayed most of the time. I know we haven't played together much but i do wonder sometimes about our tactics.
Cobbo Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 we did lose 6-1 to Ipswich at this point last time we went up... so it's not the end of the world. Although I would have preferred not to lose to ****ing Wise
Fox 4 Life Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 To be fair thats exactly what i was just thinking! oh well - one of them birmingham days me thinks - just need to forget it and move on to Watford - oh and change the ****ing TEAM MICKEY
filbertway Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 This will probably be the worst game this season. Remember ipswich and wolves, we did great after those games. Get scowy out he has missed a sitter from what ive heard, and put canero right back and gillespie right wing. Woo Hoo tiatto is back a bit of determanation in the team, who will go wilcox or stewart.
Mark Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 Adams is a twat for picking that starting 11, nothing in that team indicates we wanted to win. Probably a favor for his good friend Dennis. Cause its all about Micky Adams, you know?
Fox 4 Life Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 the sad thing is we all know Mickey wont change a thing
filbertway Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 I know what you mean petrescu, get scowcroft out, i aint bothered if you all love him, he does nothing for us, and i thought connolly was going to sore loads oh well i'm sure he will come good.
Mark Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 What is Connolly meant to do? He's played up front on his own all season, Blake cant even be considered as a partner he's so shit. We cant even give 2 strikers the service they deserve anyway, its so hard for Connolly to do anything. He's a great player, its a shame our team revolves around the mole named Scowcroft.
Cobbo Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 I know what you mean petrescu, get scowcroft out, i aint bothered if you all love him, he does nothing for us, and i thought connolly was going to sore loads oh well i'm sure he will come good. 11684[/snapback] I don't know how you can say Scowy does nothing for us.....he's done a lo in the 2 games I've seen him in this season, I can't comment on today but it sounded like a great save, at least he was there, no one else seemed close to scoring... He's far more useful than shit like Wilcox and Blake. I really don't understand why Micky kept them in, we looked a lot better v's Derby after the subs and actually sounded better today after we'd made them even if they did get another goal...
Fox 4 Life Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 yep, we need to play canero, gudjonsson etc, why scowcroft - he is SHIT, Blake has done **** all, just glad tiatto is back and he better **** play him and drop one of them clowns stewart and wilcox
Mark Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 just glad tiatto is back and he better **** play him and drop one of them clowns stewart and wilcox Thats just another sending off waiting to happen, 3 red cards in 4 games?
Fox 4 Life Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 yeh but at least he knows what he's doing - between stewart and wilcox they kinda have a clue but on there own thyre shit. the rage is unbelivable
Cobbo Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 just glad tiatto is back and he better **** play him and drop one of them clowns stewart and wilcox Thats just another sending off waiting to happen, 3 red cards in 4 games? 11689[/snapback] Joey Gudjonsson is a reckless tackler at times like Tiatto, yet you seem happy with his signing and want him to play.. Tiatto will do well I think and I don't care if there's a risk of him being sent off, Wilcox and Stewart just doesn't work.
Mark Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 Stewart will probably get dropped then, which i think is wrong. Stewart is a fine left back. Tiatto left wing or left back? Whichever it is, i worry if Wilcox is our option for attacking down the left wing, but if he's left back, thats more or less suicidal!
Cobbo Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 Stewart will probably get dropped then, which i think is wrong. Stewart is a fine left back. Tiatto left wing or left back? Whichever it is, i worry if Wilcox is our option for attacking down the left wing, but if he's left back, thats more or less suicidal! 11692[/snapback] I would love it to be Stewart and Tiatto...maybe doing that switching thing Stewart and Wilcox have been trying. With a strong, confident player with him I think Stewart will improve. With Wilcox we're just asking for trouble. Playing Wilcox as a LB is very confusing, he can't defend at all and is slow...all he has is a half decent cross..so play him LB then
gagandeep Posted 14 August 2004 Author Posted 14 August 2004 what do people think the side against watford will be? i think gk.walker rb.canero cb.dabizaz cb.heath lb.tiatto mr.scowcroft ml.wilcox mc.gudjohnson mc.williams fc.connoly fc.blake p.s. i dont want this to be the side but i think it will be. my favourite side against watford would be: gk.walker rb.canero c.b.dabizaz c.b.heath lb.tiatto mr.gillespie ml. stewart/morris mc.williams mc.gudjohnson fc.connoly fc.scowy
dhermon Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 there could be a new defender at the club by then Harald pinxten from antwerp
Cobbo Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 what do people think the side against watford will be?i think gk.walker rb.canero cb.dabizaz cb.heath lb.tiatto mr.scowcroft ml.wilcox mc.gudjohnson mc.williams fc.connoly fc.blake p.s. i dont want this to be the side but i think it will be. my favourite side against watford would be: gk.walker rb.canero c.b.dabizaz c.b.heath lb.tiatto mr.gillespie ml. stewart/morris mc.williams mc.gudjohnson fc.connoly fc.scowy 11694[/snapback] Nalis has impressed me more than Williams, but I don't know about the Millwall game.. I would like, and now hope that it will be... GK Walker RB Canero LB Tiatto CB Dabizas CB Keown/Heath depending who's fit etc.. RM Scowy LM Stewart CM Gudjonsson/Williams CM Nalis S Connolly S Benjamin Seeing as it's Watford and a home game, playing Nalis and Williams together wouldn't bother me too much but it would be nice to see Joey play a bit...
dynamite foxes Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 why don't we play 4-5-1 as Blake doesn't seem to be the buisness Walker Canero Dabizas Keown Tiatto Scowie Gudjonsson Nalis williams stewart Connollly
Cobbo Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 why don't we play 4-5-1 as Blake doesn't seem to be the buisnessWalker Canero Dabizas Keown Tiatto Scowie Gudjonsson Nalis williams stewart Connollly 11701[/snapback] we're apparently one of the best sides in this division, playing a defensive formation would be a bit strange... Just stick with 4-4-2 and get Blake, Wilcox and maybe one of Nalis or Williams out...
Micky Posted 14 August 2004 Posted 14 August 2004 Adams is a twat for picking that starting 11, nothing in that team indicates we wanted to win. Probably a favor for his good friend Dennis. Cause its all about Micky Adams, you know? 11681[/snapback] Petrescu you really do come out with some rubbish. He picked a starting 11 that won their previos game. You say nothing in the team suggested we wanted to win. I cant understand your point. What exactly was micky supposed to do - play 4 up front! Why not attempt to make comments that actually have some foundation behind them.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.