Haydos Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 I dont think ur making much sense or even making a clear point? I dont think you guys see the bigger picture of what could happen Hobbs doesn't play the football we're trying to encourage here. Sven's made that clear. A capable defender but one that doesn't fit the new system. I don't have a clear point? You've mentioned how this loan is a good move for all parties involved then gone on to question why he's leaving.
footall_realist Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 WHAT PEOPLE NEED TO REALIZE IS THAT JACK WAS TOLD ITS THE RESERVES OR LOAN. HE IS TOO GOOD FOR THE RESERVES AND THE FACT 10 CLUBS INCLUDING PREMIERSHIP CAME IN FOR HIM REFLECTS THAT. YOU GUYS DONT KNOW HOW CLOSE HE WAS TO GOING TO CELTIC AND THE CLUB MESSED IT UP. THE MAIN THING IS HE COULD GO IN THE SUMMER IF THE CLUB ACCEPT OFFERS. WE ARE PLAYING REALLY WELL NOW, MAILY DUE TO HALF THE TEAM BEING ON LOAN. NOW ANSWER THIS, WHAT HAPPENS WHEN AND IF SVEN GOES, HE WILL GO IF THE MONEY IS RIGHT. THEN WERE LEFT WITH NO CORE SQUAD AS THEY WILL GO. EXCITING BUT POSSIBLY SCARY TIMES AHEAD
Wymsey Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 I take your word for it then...................
footall_realist Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 I take your word for it then................... yea, good responce. think with your head. theres a reason he averages about a season wherever he goes, ££££. blackburn almsot had him not long ago but would not put the right money up and yea, i do have this info on good source. i hope things work out, ive been more of a fam over the years than alot but i am a realist and see the worst case scenario.
Haydos Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 yea, good responce. think with your head. theres a reason he averages about a season wherever he goes, ££££. blackburn almsot had him not long ago but would not put the right money up and yea, i do have this info on good source. i hope things work out, ive been more of a fam over the years than alot but i am a realist and see the worst case scenario. You must mean pessimist.
TheUltimateWinner Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 WHAT PEOPLE NEED TO REALIZE IS THAT JACK WAS TOLD ITS THE RESERVES OR LOAN. HE IS TOO GOOD FOR THE RESERVES AND THE FACT 10 CLUBS INCLUDING PREMIERSHIP CAME IN FOR HIM REFLECTS THAT. YOU GUYS DONT KNOW HOW CLOSE HE WAS TO GOING TO CELTIC AND THE CLUB MESSED IT UP. THE MAIN THING IS HE COULD GO IN THE SUMMER IF THE CLUB ACCEPT OFFERS. WE ARE PLAYING REALLY WELL NOW, MAILY DUE TO HALF THE TEAM BEING ON LOAN. NOW ANSWER THIS, WHAT HAPPENS WHEN AND IF SVEN GOES, HE WILL GO IF THE MONEY IS RIGHT. THEN WERE LEFT WITH NO CORE SQUAD AS THEY WILL GO. EXCITING BUT POSSIBLY SCARY TIMES AHEAD OKAY ALLRIGHT NO NEED TO SHOUT!
TheUltimateWinner Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 oh la la la oh la la la oh la la la la la la Frisky.
Captain... Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 WHAT PEOPLE NEED TO REALIZE IS THAT JACK WAS TOLD ITS THE RESERVES OR LOAN. HE IS TOO GOOD FOR THE RESERVES AND THE FACT 10 CLUBS INCLUDING PREMIERSHIP CAME IN FOR HIM REFLECTS THAT. YOU GUYS DONT KNOW HOW CLOSE HE WAS TO GOING TO CELTIC AND THE CLUB MESSED IT UP. THE MAIN THING IS HE COULD GO IN THE SUMMER IF THE CLUB ACCEPT OFFERS. WE ARE PLAYING REALLY WELL NOW, MAILY DUE TO HALF THE TEAM BEING ON LOAN. NOW ANSWER THIS, WHAT HAPPENS WHEN AND IF SVEN GOES, HE WILL GO IF THE MONEY IS RIGHT. THEN WERE LEFT WITH NO CORE SQUAD AS THEY WILL GO. EXCITING BUT POSSIBLY SCARY TIMES AHEAD Strewth mate, you make me sound like an optimistic. Hobbs was told reserves or loan? We don't have a reserve side, although Sven is arranging more reserve games than Pearson or Sousa did, but still anyone would choose loan in that situation. He may go in the Summer, depends on a number of things, but if Sven has any sense about him he will not let him go cheap, so a loan deal to prove his worth makes sense to put him in the shop window and maybe give him some experience and confidence to come back and do a job for us. I made the point before about going to a team managed by NP would be a step backwards, so if he wants to come back after a loan spell and play for us he would be better advised to go to a footballing side, even if it is in League 1. A shame the Celtic loan didn't go through, he would have got some games as they were screwed for centre backs at the time, and it would have been a good level to play at, but these things happen, your implication is that it is the clubs fault he didn't go. If you know anything then please share. I don't think there is any point worrying about Sven leaving, his laoyalty credentials in the last 5 years aren't great, but he only agreed to manage Ivory Coast for the World Cup, he was sacked by Man City and the whole Notts County thing was just a bit weird. I'm pretty sure we'll get some serious compo if he does go so it's not high on my worry list. Now if you can just turn off caps lock and maybe add a bit of punctuation, you will fit in just nicely here.
footall_realist Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Strewth mate, you make me sound like an optimistic. Hobbs was told reserves or loan? We don't have a reserve side, although Sven is arranging more reserve games than Pearson or Sousa did, but still anyone would choose loan in that situation. He may go in the Summer, depends on a number of things, but if Sven has any sense about him he will not let him go cheap, so a loan deal to prove his worth makes sense to put him in the shop window and maybe give him some experience and confidence to come back and do a job for us. I made the point before about going to a team managed by NP would be a step backwards, so if he wants to come back after a loan spell and play for us he would be better advised to go to a footballing side, even if it is in League 1. A shame the Celtic loan didn't go through, he would have got some games as they were screwed for centre backs at the time, and it would have been a good level to play at, but these things happen, your implication is that it is the clubs fault he didn't go. If you know anything then please share. I don't think there is any point worrying about Sven leaving, his laoyalty credentials in the last 5 years aren't great, but he only agreed to manage Ivory Coast for the World Cup, he was sacked by Man City and the whole Notts County thing was just a bit weird. I'm pretty sure we'll get some serious compo if he does go so it's not high on my worry list. Now if you can just turn off caps lock and maybe add a bit of punctuation, you will fit in just nicely here. Fair play to you mate, at least you give a decent argument. On the Celtic issue, the offer came in in more than enough time but the fax for the deal was not sent until literally just after 11pm, as o broad window closes at 11 it was not allowed. As for the reserves, he was put in the squad that was playing Southampton but took the loan move because he wants to play proper football. I am an out and out City fan but see the bigger picture. After the disaster that followed O'Neil we deserve some look and at this rate, I would not rule out auto promotion. All I am saying is that we need to see the possible picture. Lets face it, Sven is bent and theres a lot he has done and does that goes unknown the public but thats another factor. I do worry that we may not make the premiership, a big club will come in for Sven and he will go and these players will go as well and leave us right in the shit again. Hopefully, he will get us up and we can go back to trying to establish our self as a mid table prem side like 10 years ago.
Haydos Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Fair play to you mate, at least you give a decent argument. On the Celtic issue, the offer came in in more than enough time but the fax for the deal was not sent until literally just after 11pm, as o broad window closes at 11 it was not allowed. As for the reserves, he was put in the squad that was playing Southampton but took the loan move because he wants to play proper football. I am an out and out City fan but see the bigger picture. After the disaster that followed O'Neil we deserve some look and at this rate, I would not rule out auto promotion. All I am saying is that we need to see the possible picture. Lets face it, Sven is bent and theres a lot he has done and does that goes unknown the public but thats another factor. I do worry that we may not make the premiership, a big club will come in for Sven and he will go and these players will go as well and leave us right in the shit again. Hopefully, he will get us up and we can go back to trying to establish our self as a mid table prem side like 10 years ago. Albeit pessimistic, why do you now sound mildly sane? I still don't know what your point regarding this issue is. Do you think he should be in our first team, on the bench, not in the squad or out on loan?
davieG Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Fair play to you mate, at least you give a decent argument. On the Celtic issue, the offer came in in more than enough time but the fax for the deal was not sent until literally just after 11pm, as o broad window closes at 11 it was not allowed. As for the reserves, he was put in the squad that was playing Southampton but took the loan move because he wants to play proper football. I am an out and out City fan but see the bigger picture. After the disaster that followed O'Neil we deserve some look and at this rate, I would not rule out auto promotion. All I am saying is that we need to see the possible picture. Lets face it, Sven is bent and theres a lot he has done and does that goes unknown the public but thats another factor. I do worry that we may not make the premiership, a big club will come in for Sven and he will go and these players will go as well and leave us right in the shit again. Hopefully, he will get us up and we can go back to trying to establish our self as a mid table prem side like 10 years ago. Please don't make statements like this on this forum you may be able to afford a good lawyer but Mark can't. Any repeat will warrant a ban. The forum owner, admin and mods completely disavow and disassociate themselves from this remark. davieG Admin
Bugg Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Footall_realist is a dumbass The accusations of Sven being disloyal are completely unfounded. Even the Blackburn thing was only a verbal agreement and nothing else. And how can you call Sven bent with all the poon he gets?
Guest BlueBrett Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Realist shoots to the top of the FT idiot table in a mere seven posts. Could be a record. probably isn't
Bugg Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Also, how did you manage to spell football wrong, Realist?
footall_realist Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Fair play admin, I didn't realize an opinion could be took like that but its your rules. Do I think Hobbs should be starting with the squad as it is, then I'd say no they deserve there place. My arguments was with people saying he should not be allowed to go to to Hull and that he actually isnt good enough. As for all the comments calling me this and that, non of you can argue against what I am saying as you know its a possibility. The thing is, most of the starting 11 is loan players. Hopefully we will go up, Sven will stay and we will build a premiership squad. How please anyone state where what I have said is bull?
davieG Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Fair play admin, I didn't realize an opinion could be took like that but its your rules. Do I think Hobbs should be starting with the squad as it is, then I'd say no they deserve there place. My arguments was with people saying he should not be allowed to go to to Hull and that he actually isnt good enough. As for all the comments calling me this and that, non of you can argue against what I am saying as you know its a possibility. The thing is, most of the starting 11 is loan players. Hopefully we will go up, Sven will stay and we will build a premiership squad. How please anyone state where what I have said is bull? It's nothing to do with our rules, it's a slanderous statement and unless you can prove it's true in a court of law you may well be sued by Sven if he saw it, many people have been sued for less, you're also putting the forum at the risk of being sued for carrying the statement. If you're now saying it's just an opinion then it's definitely slanderous.
footall_realist Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Ok, but I think the comment it self suggests nothing or gives an accusation. I guess freedom of speech and any humor isnt ok in this incident and I'll take your advice and "retract" it if you like. Give me a break only just started .
lcfcadam Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Bamba has scored a few goals but defensively is awful and I think due a big cock up. I was at the Man City away game and he is lucky Tevez didn't punish him, had no idea how to mark the guy and never got Naughton to cover.
Haydos Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Fair play admin, I didn't realize an opinion could be took like that but its your rules. Do I think Hobbs should be starting with the squad as it is, then I'd say no they deserve there place. My arguments was with people saying he should not be allowed to go to to Hull and that he actually isnt good enough. As for all the comments calling me this and that, non of you can argue against what I am saying as you know its a possibility. The thing is, most of the starting 11 is loan players. Hopefully we will go up, Sven will stay and we will build a premiership squad. How please anyone state where what I have said is bull? The point about Hull most people were making was down to their style of play. You haven't mentioned that. Again with the second point, not many have said he isn't good enough, only that he has cost us goals and doesn't fit in at the moment. If he can adapt, then great but at this time he isn't right for us. Thirdly, 4 of the first choice 11 are loanees. Mee, Naughton, PVA and Yakubu. It's hard to take you seriously when you are ignorant of so many things.
davieG Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Ok, but I think the comment it self suggests nothing or gives an accusation. I guess freedom of speech and any humor isnt ok in this incident and I'll take your advice and "retract" it if you like. Give me a break only just started . So what indication were you trying to give by say "Sven is bent" Bent –adjective 1.curved; crooked: a bent bow; a bent stick.2.determined; set; resolved (usually followed by on ): to bebent on buying a new car.3.Chiefly British Slang .a.morally crooked; corrupt.b.stolen: bent merchandise.c.homosexual.–noun4.direction taken, as by one's interests; inclination: a bent forpainting.5.capacity of endurance: to work at the top of one's bent.6.Civil Engineering . a transverse frame, as of a bridge or anaqueduct, designed to support either vertical or horizontalloads.7.Archaic . bent state or form; curvature.
footall_realist Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Look, seems like this forum is only for fans who see what they want and dream of. On that note I wont bother looking on here again. Laters
TheUltimateWinner Posted 14 February 2011 Posted 14 February 2011 Time to say goodbye (8) I like how he thaught that homophobia was funny? Idiot in a mere 10 posts ;L
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.