blueredswed Posted 7 November 2011 Posted 7 November 2011 In England blueredswed you can tell how good a manager is just by their name. If their surname begins with 'Mc' then keep well clear they are the worst OK! Thanks.... soo we all knew he is gone in May at least or when father comes
Zingari Posted 7 November 2011 Posted 7 November 2011 The name is better suited to a pet snail than a man My pet snail is called Felix Felix the Helix Nigel means "champion" http://www.babynamespedia.com/meaning/Nigel
themotivator Posted 7 November 2011 Posted 7 November 2011 alternate cut. sexy in a different way.( it also seems that both Primus and Robbie Williams have been making plans for Nigel at some point... I won't be the one posting those efforts though.)
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 I have a Cat called Nigel, he is very clever he even buries his own shit ! I expect Pearson does that too.
whoareyaaa Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 Its because he's got a shit haircut! No because hes got a big nose.
lcfcbaby Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 We should go into next Sunday's game with an open mind. If you have no backing for Pearson then you have no loyalty!
wellyfox Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 Seems to me that the years in-between his previous reign have some what changed people's opinions of him for no apparent reason? Don't really think it's him or his name but dellusions of granduer. Some plainly think we are a cross between chelski man u and man city. Cos we seem to have a few quid to throw around.
hackneyfox Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 We should go into next Sunday's game with an open mind. If you have no backing for Pearson then you have no loyalty! This along with 'hate' show just how ott this board can get.
lcfcbaby Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 All I'm saying is I'm fed up of people saying Pearson isn't loyal because of the hull situation when clearly they're not backing him themselves which is just contradiction.
lcfcsnow Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 I'm literally scared to death that he'll bring back Fryatt, and start playing Weale in goal again. Not to mention Steve Howard up front for the remainder of the season and the negative tactics, this might finish me off.
Dr The Singh Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 I'm literally scared to death that he'll bring back Fryatt, and start playing Weale in goal again. Not to mention Steve Howard up front for the remainder of the season and the negative tactics, this might finish me off. Take this you will feel better:
themotivator Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 I'm literally scared to death that he'll bring back Fryatt, and start playing Weale in goal again. Not to mention Steve Howard up front for the remainder of the season and the negative tactics, this might finish me off. why would he start playing weale again?
Babylon Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 and the negative tactics, this might finish me off. You can't get much more negative than we already have been this season.
mancunianfox Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 The Pearson haters are probably all just Matty Fryatt and Jack Hobbs’ parachute accounts.
Dr The Singh Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 Ever present under his stewardship. SO is this:
themotivator Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 Ever present under his stewardship. yes, but we clearly have a better keeper now, who was bought with money that wasnt available to nige before he left. it would be suicide (slight exaggeration) on his part to drop kasper.
lcfcsnow Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 yes, but we clearly have a better keeper now, who was bought with money that wasnt available to nige before he left. it would be suicide (slight exaggeration) on his part to drop kasper. I agree but I can see Pearson clashing with him, or anyone with a personality/ego. Weale is like Fryatt/Hobbs, a quiet goodytwoshoes who will keep himself to himself.
mancunianfox Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 yes, but we clearly have a better keeper now, who was bought with money that wasnt available to nige before he left. it would be suicide (slight exaggeration) on his part to drop kasper. Schmeichels distribution needs to improve though, at the moment it is a liability. Having said that Weale is just as bad. Is it me or does every goalkeeper we sign seem to get gradually worse at kicking the football???
Wherethefoxhat? Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 Ever present under his stewardship. Stewardship .........punditry at its best !
wellyfox Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 I'm literally scared to death that he'll bring back Fryatt, and start playing Weale in goal again. Not to mention Steve Howard up front for the remainder of the season and the negative tactics, this might finish me off. Should just about finish NP off too. They will still expect him to gain promotion. You think he is gonna risk his future playing shite. So he will get a pay off but who would employ him then. I really am at a loss as to why people can't use common sense. He has money has better players I don't even think Waggy will come back if hcfc still want him. Fryatt return would be the biggest fvckin joke going.
hackneyfox Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 Schmeichels distribution needs to improve though, at the moment it is a liability. Having said that Weale is just as bad. Is it me or does every goalkeeper we sign seem to get gradually worse at kicking the football??? Every goalkeeper we sign gets worse It's called the Stowell effect.
nuttytimmy Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 Should just about finish NP off too. They will still expect him to gain promotion. You think he is gonna risk his future playing shite. So he will get a pay off but who would employ him then. I really am at a loss as to why people can't use common sense. He has money has better players I don't even think Waggy will come back if hcfc still want him. Fryatt return would be the biggest fvckin joke going. As I have said before, Pearson isn't an idiot and won't buy back Fryatt and Hobbs because he likes them. He's got far too many better players to do that. The only one likely to get a look in is Waghorn, as he is still contracted to Leicester - not that he will get a look in, because he isn't good enough.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 8 November 2011 Posted 8 November 2011 As I have said before, Pearson isn't an idiot and won't buy back Fryatt and Hobbs because he likes them. He's got far too many better players to do that. The only one likely to get a look in is Waghorn, as he is still contracted to Leicester - not that he will get a look in, because he isn't good enough. Im not so sure, given a bit of confidence and the fact Vassell is out for 6 moths, Waggy may get another chance
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.